Research into the effectiveness of learner control in tutorial computer assisted instruction has produced equivocal results. In order to analyze these results, learner control is defined within a general model of decisions and information in instructional systems. When the research is categorized according to this model, the effectiveness of learner control is confirmed and a preliminary conclusion concerning the importance of information is reached. A case is made for an instructional design focus in learner control research based on model building rather than hypothesis testing.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
SteinbergE. R., Cognition and Learner Control: A Literature Review, 1977–1988, Journal of Computer Based Instruction, 16: 4, pp. 117–121, 1989.
2.
SteinbergE. R., Review of Student Control in Computer-assisted Instruction, Journal of Computer Based Instruction, 3: 3, pp. 84–90, 1977.
3.
FryJ. P., Interactive Relationship Between Inquisitiveness and Student Control of Instruction, Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, pp. 459–465, 1972.
4.
FisherM. D.BlackwellL. R.GarciaA. B., and GreeneJ. C., Effects of Student Control and Choice on Engagement in a CAI Arithmetic Task in a Low-income School, Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, pp. 776–783, 1975.
5.
ReigeluthC. M., Instructional-Design Theories and Models: An Overview of Their Current Status, Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1983.
6.
SuchmanL. A., Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-machine Communication, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 1987.
7.
MerrillM. D., What is Learner Control?ERIC Document Reproduction Service, No. ED 298 905, 1984.
8.
ArmstrongA.-M., The Development of Self-regulation Skills Through the Modelling and Structuring of Computer Programming, Educational Technology Research & Development, 37: 2, pp. 69–76, 1989.
9.
ArnoneM. P. and GrabowskiB. L., Effects on Children's Achievement and Curiosity of Variations in Learner Control Over an Interactive Video Lesson, Educational Technology Research and Development, 40: 1, pp. 15–27, 1992.
10.
AvnerA.MooreC., and SmithS., Active External Control: A Basis for Superiority of CBI, Journal of Computer Based Instruction, 6: 4, pp. 115–118, 1980.
11.
CampanizziJ. A., Effects of Locus of Control and Provision of Overviews in a Computer-assisted Instruction Sequence, Association Educational Data Systems Journal, 12: 1, pp. 21–30, 1978.
12.
CarrierC. A.DavidsonG. V., and WilliamsM. D., The Selection of Instructional Options in a Computer-based Coordinate Concept Lesson, Educational Communications and Technology Journal, 33, pp. 199–212, 1985.
13.
CarrierC. A.DavidsonG. V.WilliamsM. D., and KalweitC. M., Instructional Options and Encouragement Effects in a Microcomputer-delivered Concept Lesson, Journal of Educational Research, 79: 4, pp. 222–229, 1986.
14.
CarrierC. A. and WilliamsM. D., A Test of One Learner-control Strategy with Students of Differing Levels of Task Persistence, Association for Educational Research Journal, 25, pp. 285–206, 1988.
15.
EllermanH. H. and FreeE. L., A Subject-controlled Environment for Paired Associate Learning, Journal of Computer Based Instruction, 17: 3, pp. 97–102, 1990.
16.
GayG., Interaction of Learner Control and Prior Understanding in Computer-assisted Video Instruction, Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, pp. 225–227, 1986.
17.
GoetzfriedL. and HannafinM. J., The Effect of the Locus of CAI Control Strategies on the Learning of Mathematics, Association for Educational Research Journal, 22, pp. 273–278, 1985.
18.
GrayS. H., The Effect of Locus of Control and Sequence Control on Computerized Information Retrieval and Retention, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, pp. 459–471, 1989.
19.
HannafinM. J. and ColamaioM. E., The Effects of Variations in Lesson Control and Practice on Learning from Interactive Video, Educational Communications and Technology Journal, 35, pp. 203–212, 1987.
20.
HintzeH.MohrH., and WenzelA., Students' Attitudes towards Control Methods in Computer-assisted Instruction, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 4, pp. 3–10, 1988.
21.
JacobsonE. and ThompsonM., Self-managed Learning Using CAI, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 104 362, 1975.
22.
JuddW. A., An Investigation of the Effects of Learner Control in Computer-Assisted-Instructional Prerequisite Mathematics, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 053 532, 1970.
23.
KinzieM. B. and SullivanH. J., Continuing Motivation, Learner Control and CAI, Educational Technology Research & Development, 37: 2, pp. 5–14, 1989.
24.
KinzieM. B.SullivanH. J., and BerdelR. L., Motivational and Achievement Effects of Learner Control over Content Review in CAI, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 8: 1, pp. 101–114, 1992.
25.
KinzieM. B.SullivanH. J., and BerdelR. L., Learner Control and Achievement in Science Computer-assisted Instruction, Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, pp. 299–303, 1988.
26.
KleinJ. D. and KellerJ. M., Influence of Student Ability, Locus of Control, and Type of Instructional Control on Performance and Confidence, Journal of Educational Research, 83: 3, pp. 140–146, 1990.
27.
LaheyG. F. and CoadyJ. D., Learner Control of Instructional Sequence in Computer-based Instruction: A Comparison to Program Control (Report No. NPRDC-TN-78-7), ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 211 049, Navy Personnel Research and Development Center, San Diego, California, 1978.
28.
Lee-MiheonJ., Effects of Different Loci of Instructional Control on Students' Metacognition and Cognition: Learner vs. Program Control, proceedings of selected research papers from the convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 323 938, 1990.
29.
LopezC. L. and HarperM., The Relationship between Learner Control of CAI and Locus of Control among Hispanic Students, Educational Technology Research & Development, 37: 4, pp. 19–28, 1989.
30.
MayerR. E., Differences in Breadth of Transfer Due to Advance Organizers and Subject Control of Frame Sequence, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 121 284, 1976.
31.
McGrathD., Hypertext, CAI, or Program Control: Do Learners Benefit From Choices?, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24: 4, pp. 513–532, 1992.
32.
MilheimW. D., The Effects of Pacing and Sequence Control in an Interactive Video Lesson, Education & Training Technology International, 27, pp. 7–19, 1990.
33.
MilheimW. D., Perceived Attitude Effects of Various Types of Learner Control in an Interactive Video Lesson, proceedings of selected research papers from the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 308 828, 1989.
34.
MorrisonG. R.RossS. M., and BaldwinW., Learner Control of Context and Instructional Support in Learning Elementary Mathematics, Educational Technology Research and Development, 40: 1, pp. 5–13, 1992.
35.
MurphyM. A. and DavidsonG. V., Computer-Based Adaptive Instruction: Effects of Learner Control on Concept Learning, Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 18, pp. 51–56, 1991.
36.
NewbyT. J. and AlterP. A., Task Motivation: Learner Selection of Intrinsic versus Extrinsic Orientations, Educational Technology Research & Development, 37: 2, pp. 77–90, 1989.
37.
PollockJ. C. and SullivanH. J., Practice Mode and Learner Control in Computer-based Instruction, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 15, pp. 251–260, 1990.
38.
RobsonE. H.StewardA. P., and WhitfieldG. E., Pupils' Choices in Learning with Computers, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 4, pp. 93–102, 1988.
39.
RossS. M.MorrisonG. R., and O'DellJ. K., Uses and Effects of Learner Control and Instructional Support in Computer-Based Instruction, proceedings of selected research papers from the convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 323 945, 1990.
40.
RossS. M.MorrisonG. R., and O'DellJ. K., Text Density and Learner-control as Design Variables with CBI and Print Materials, proceedings of selected research papers from the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 295 661, 1988.
41.
RossS. M.McCormickD., and KrisakN., Adapting the Thematic Context of Mathematical Problems to Student Interests: Individualized versus Group-based Strategies, Journal of Educational Research, 79: 4, pp. 245–252, 1986.
42.
RossS. M.MorrisonG. R., and O'DellJ. K., Obtaining More Out of Less Text in CBI: Effects of Varied Text Density Levels as a Function of Learner Characteristics and Control Strategy, Educational Communications and Technology Journal, 36: 3, pp. 131–142, 1988.
43.
RossS. M.MorrisonG. R., and O'DellJ. K., Uses and Effects of Learner Control of Context and Instructional Support in Computer-based Instruction, Educational Technology Research & Development, 37: 4, pp. 29–39, 1989.
44.
RubincamI. and OlivierW. P., An Investigation of Limited Learner-control Options in a CAI Mathematics Course, Association for Educational Data Systems Journal, 18: 4, pp. 211–226, 1985.
45.
SchlossP. J.WisniewskiL. A., and CartwrightG. P., The Differential Effect of Learner Control and Feedback in College Students' Performance on CAI Modules, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4: 2, pp. 141–150, 1988.
46.
SteinbergE. R.BaskinA. B., and HoferE., Organizational/Memory Tools: A Technique for Improving Problem Solving Skills, Journal of Educational. Computing Research, 2, pp. 169–187, 1986.
47.
SteinbergE. R.BaskinA. B., and MatthewsT. D., Computer-presented Organizational/Memory Aids as Instruction for Solving Pico-fomi Problems, Journal of Computer Based Instruction, 12: 2, pp. 44–49, 1985.
48.
TennysonC. L.TennysonR. D., and RothenW., Content Structure and Instructional Control Strategies as Design Variables in Concept Acquisition, Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, pp. 499–505, 1980.
49.
TennysonR. D., Instructional Control Strategies and Content Structure as Design Variables in Concept Acquisition, Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, pp. 525–532, 1980.
50.
TennysonR. D., Use of Adaptive Information for Advisement in Learning Concepts and Rules Using Computer-assisted Instruction, Association for Educational Research Journal, 18, pp. 425–438, 1981.
51.
TennysonR. D. and ButtreyT., Advisement and Management Strategies as Design Variables in Computer-assisted Instruction, Educational Communications and Technology Journal, 28: 3, pp. 169–176, 1980.
