BrudneyJ., HerbertF. T. & WrightD. S. (2007). Reinventing Government in the American States: Measuring and Explaining Administrative Reform.Public Administration Review, 59(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.2307/977476
2.
GrimmelikhuijsenS., JilkeS., OlsenA. L. & TummersL. (2016). Behavioral Public Administration: Combining Insights from Public Administration and Psychology.Public Administration Review, (May). https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12609
3.
HolzerM. & LuY. (2016). Chinese Public Administration Review: Relaunching a Necessary Dialogue.Chinese Public Administration Review, 7(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.22140/cpar.v7i1.116
4.
HolzerM. & ZhangM. (2002). Chinese Public Administration Review: An introduction.Chinese Public Administration Review, 1(1), 5–8.
5.
KimM., MasonD. P. & LiH. (2017). Experimental Research for Nonprofit Management: Charitable Giving and Fundraising. In JamesO., JilkeS. & RyzinG. G. Van (Eds.), Experiments in Public Management Research: Challenges & Contributions (pp. 415–436). Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
6.
LiH. & ChenB. (2018). Turning Challenges into Opportunities: Advancing Studies of Nonprofit Organizations in China.Chinese Public Administration Review, 9(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.22140/cpar.v9i1.172
7.
LiH. & Van RyzinG. G. (2017). A Systematic Review of Experimental Studies in Public Management Journals. In JamesO., JilkeS. & RyzinG.G. Van (Eds.), Experiments in Public Management Research: Challenges & Contributions (pp. 20–36). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316676912.003
8.
MaJ., WangQ., DongC. & LiH. (2017). The Research Infrastructure of Chinese Foundations, a database for Chinese civil society studies.Scientific Data, 4, 170094. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.94