Assessing Agency-Level Performance Evaluation Reform in China: Can It Truly Serve as a Management Innovation?

Abstract

As in many other countries, performance management has received wide attention in China in order to increase government efficiency and accountability. However, agency-level performance management reforms have been largely overlooked in the existing literature, with regard to the process of developing performance measures, stakeholder involvement, and the assessment of these measures. By investigating a provincial departmental case, this article reveals that the latest development of China's performance management reform has become increasingly sophisticated, with consideration for both political legitimacy and management efficiency. However, significant challenges remain before such efforts can be fully implemented as management innovations to truly improve government performance and accountability.

Keywords

performance evaluation management innovation agency accountability efficiency reform

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Behn

R. D.

(2003). Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 586–606.

Berman

& Wang

(2000). Performance measurement in U.S. counties: Capacity for reform. Public Administration Review, 60(5), 409–420.

Birkinshaw

Hamel

& Mol

(2008). Management innovation. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 825–845.

Bouckaert

(1993). Measurement and meaningful management. Public Productivity and Management Review, 17(1), 31–44.

Burns

J. P.

& Zhou

(2010). Performance management in the government of the People's Republic of China: Accountability and control in the implementation of public policy. OECD Journal of Budgeting, 2, 1–28.

Chan

H. S.

& Gao

(2008). Performance measurement in Chinese local governments. Chinese Law and Government, 41(2–3), 4–9.

Chan

H. S.

& Gao

(2009). Putting the cart before the horse: Accountability or performance? The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 68(S1): S51–S61.

Daglio

; Gerson

& Kitchen

(2014, November), Building organisational capacity for public sector innovation. Paper presented at the OECD Conference “Innovating the Public Sector: from Ideas to Impact”, Paris, France.

Dai

& Teng

(2008). Performance evaluation at local government department level in China: A case study of People's Municipal Government of Hangzhou (PMGH). Nottingham, UK: Nottingham Trent University.

10.

de Lancer Julnes

(2009). Performance-based management systems: Effective implementation and maintenance. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

11.

Department of Ocean and Fisheries of Hainan Province. (2010). Bidding document of performance management system. Haikou, Hainan: DOFHP Office.

12.

Department of Ocean and Fisheries of Hainan Province. (2012). Completion report on performance evaluation of Department of Ocean and Fisheries of Hainan Province (Subproject D05–09). Haikou, Hainan: DOFHP.

13.

Dubnick

(2005). Accountability and the promise of performance: In search of the mechanisms. Public Performance & Management Review, 27(3), 376–417.

14.

Gao

(2009). Governing by goals and numbers: A case study in the use of performance measurement to build state capacity in China. Public Administration and Development, 29, 21–31.

15.

Gao

(2010). Hitting the target but missing the point: The rise of non-mission-based targets in performance measurement of Chinese local governments. Administration & Society, 42, 56S–76S.

16.

Hammerschmid

Van de Walle

& Stimac

(2013). Internal and external use of performance information in public organizations: Results from an international survey. Public Money & Management, 33(4): 261–268.

17.

Lagerkvist

(2005). The techno-cadre's dream administrative reform by electronic governance in China today?. China Information, 19(2), 189–216.

18.

Liu

K. C.

(1995). State control and performance evaluation: The case of a state-owned enterprise in China. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 8(6), 29–50.

19.

Lorena

R. L.

Simmonds

& Roman

(2012). Trends and challenges in public sector innovation in Europe. Brussels, Belgium: Technopolis Group.

20.

(2007). Performance budgeting: The perspective of state agencies. Public Budgeting & Finance, 27(4), 1–17.

21.

(2008). Managing the design of performance measures: The role of agencies. Public Performance & Management Review, 32(1), 7–24.

22.

Willoughby

& Arnett

(2009). Legislating results: Examining the legal foundations of PBB systems in the States. Public Performance & Management Review, 33(2), 266–287.

23.

Moore

(1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

24.

Moynihan

D. P.

(2008). The dynamics of performance management: Constructing information and reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

25.

Moynihan

D. P.

& Ingraham

P. W.

(2003). Look for the silver lining: When performance-based accountability systems work. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(4), 469–490.

26.

(2008). Reflections on recent performance measurement practices in Chinese government. Journal of Sun Yat-sen University (translated from Chinese), 48(3), 134–141.

27.

& Yu

(2009). Performance measures for local governments: The utilization of BSC, KPI, and performance diamond model. Journal of Wuhan University (in Chinese), 62(5), 702–710.

28.

Nunnally

J. C.

(1978). Psychometric theory, 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

29.

J. C.

(1992). Fiscal reform and the economic foundations of local state corporatism in China. World Politics, 45(1), 99–126.

30.

Pollitt

(2013). The logics of performance management. Evaluation, 19(4), 346–363.

31.

Pollitt

& Dan

(2013). Searching for impacts in performance-oriented management reforms: A review of the European literature. Public Performance and Management Review, 37(1): 7–32.

32.

Pollitt

Harrison

Dowswell

Jerak-Zuiderent

& Bal

Roland

. (2010). Performance regimes in health care: Institutions, critical junctures and the logic of escalation in England and the Netherlands. Evaluation, 16(13), 13–29.

33.

Schmidle

T. P.

(2011). Performance management: Laudable objectives, limited usage, lowered expectations. Public Performance & Management Review, 35(2), 370–389.

34.

Streib

G.D.

& Poister

T. H.

(1999). Assessing the validity, legitimacy, and functionality of performance measurement systems in municipal governments. American Review of Public Administration, 29(2), 107–123.

35.

Taylor

(2006). Performance measurement in Australian and Hong Kong government departments. Public Performance & Management Review, 29(3), 334–357.

36.

Thiel

& Leeuw

F. L.

(2002). The performance paradox in the public sector. Public Performance & Management Review, 25(3), 267–281.

37.

Tsinghua University. (2012). Evaluation report on performance evaluation of Department of Ocean and Fisheries of Hainan Province. Beijing, China: Author.

38.

Walder

A. G.

(1995). Local governments as industrial firms: an organizational analysis of China's transitional economy. American Journal of Sociology, 101(2), 263–301.

39.

Walker

R. M.

& Wu

(2010). Future prospects for performance management in Chinese city governments. Administration & Society, 42, 34S–55S.

40.

Willoughby

K. G.

(2004). Performance measurement and budget balancing: State government perspective. Public Budgeting & Finance, 24(2), 21–39.

41.

World Bank. (2006). China economic reform implementation project. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/loans-credits/2006/04/11/china-economic-reform-implementation-project

42.

Yang

(2011). The Sisyphean fate of government-wide performance accountability reforms: Federal performance management efforts and employees' daily work, 2002–2008. Public Performance & Management Review, 35(1), 149–176.

43.

Yin

R. K.

(2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th Edition). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

44.

(2011). Open government information: Challenges faced by public human resource management in China. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(13), 879–888.

45.

Zhu

& Xue

(2007). Think tanks in transitional China. Public Administration and Development, 27, 452–464.