This article critiques the Smart Population Foundation Initiative (SPFI), which was established to ‘bring parenting information and the science of child development to Australian parents and carers' (Smart Population Foundation, 2006) and to satisfy the need for a credible and easily accessible source of information for parents. The article draws on the notion of modern governance developed by Rose and analyses the Initiative as a deeply political project. It looks at the Initiative from a critical distance created by the context of governmentality. The authors argue that the discourses produced by the Initiative constitute a particular notion of parent as ‘smart’ (lifelong learner, responsible and informed). These discourses govern parents through ‘ethopolitics’ to take up a certain art of parenting as their supposed free choice. Through standardising and sanctioning a particular way of acting as a parent, the SPFI translates governmental objectives into parents' own values and practices. As a result, the discourse the SPFI constitutes about parenting effectively ‘shuts down’ multiple understandings of being a ‘good’ parent. Hence, parents' conscious formation of their parenting practices are inhibited and with that, the ethical debates around this contentious issue are silenced.
References
1.
AilwoodJ. (2002) Governing Preschool: Producing and managing preschool education in Queensland government schools. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
2.
BlochM.HolmlundK.MoqvistI. & PopkewitzT. (2003a) Global and Local Patterns of Governing the Child, Family, Their Care, and Education: An introduction, in BlochM.HolmlundK.MoqvistI. & PopkewitzT. (Eds) Governing Children, Families and Education, 3–33. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
3.
BlochM.HolmlundK.MoqvistI. & PopkewitzT. (Eds) (2003b) Governing Children, Families and Education: Restructuring the welfare state. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
4.
BredekampS. & CoppleC. (1997) Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Education Programs Serving Children from Birth to Age 8. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
5.
BrennanD. (1994) The Politics of Australian Child Care: From philanthropy to feminism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BurchellG. (1996) Liberal Government and Techniques of the Self, in BarryA.OsborneT. & RoseN. (Eds) Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism and rationalities of government, 19–36. London: UCL Press.
BurmanE.AitkenG.AlldredA. (Eds) (1996) Psychology Discourse Practice: From regulation to resistance. London: Taylor & Francis.
9.
CannellaG.S. (1997) Deconstructing Early Childhood Education: Social justice and revolution. New York: Peter Lang.
10.
CannellaG.S. (1999) The Scientific Discourse of Education: Predetermining the lives of others — Foucault, education and children, Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 1(1), 36–44. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.2304/ciec.2000.1.1.6
11.
Commonwealth Task Force on Child Development, Health and Welfare (2003) Towards the Development of a National Agenda for Early Childhood. Consultation Paper. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
12.
DahlbergG. & MossP. (2005) Ethics and Politics in Early Childhood Education. London and New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
13.
DahlbergG.MossP. & PenceA. (1999) Beyond Quality in Early Childhood Education and Care: Postmodern perspectives. London and Philadelphia: RoutledgeFalmer.
14.
DeanM. (1999) Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. London: Sage.
15.
DelpitL. (1988) The Silenced Dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people's children, Harvard Educational Review, 58(3), 280–298.
16.
DonzelotJ. (1979) The Policing of Families. New York: Pantheon.
HayJ. (2003) Unaided Virtues: The (neo)liberalization of the domestic sphere and the new architecture of community, in BratichJ.Z.PackerJ. & McCarthyC. (Eds) Foucault, Cultural Studies and Governmentality, 165–206. Albany: State University of New York Press.
HendrickH. (2000) Constructions and Reconstructions of British Childhood: An interpretative survey, 1800 to the present, in JamesA. & ProutA. (Eds) Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood: Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood, 34–62. London: Falmer Press.
HultqvistK. (1998) A History of the Present in Children's Welfare in Sweden: From Fröbel to present-day decentralization projects, in PopkewitzT. & BrennanM. (Eds) Foucault's Challenge: Discourse, knowledge, and power in education, 91–116. New York and London: Teachers College, Columbia University.
25.
HultqvistK. & DahlbergG. (Eds) (2001) Governing the Child in the New Millennium. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
26.
JamesA. & ProutA. (Eds) (1997) Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood: Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood. London and Philadelphia: Falmer Press.
27.
JamrozikA. (2001) Social Policy in the Post-welfare State: Australians on the threshold of the 21st century. French Forest, NSW: Pearson Education Australia.
28.
KellyS.BoltonT. & HardingA. (2005) May the Labour Force Be with You, AMP, NATSEM Income and Wealth Report.
29.
KociumbasJ. (1997) Australian Childhood: A history. St Leonards: Allen & Unwin.
30.
LingardB. (2000) Federalism in Schooling since the Karmel Report (1973), Schools in Australia: From modernist hope to postmodernist performativity, Australian Educational Researcher, 27(2), 25–61.
31.
LubeckS. (1994) The Politics of Developmentally Appropriate Practice: Exploring issues of culture, class, and curriculum, in MalloryB. & NewR. (Eds) Diversity and Developmentally Appropriate Practices: Toward more inclusive theory, teaching and social policy, 17–43. New York: Teachers College Press.
32.
LyotardJ.F. (1984) The Postmodern Condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
MossP. & PetrieP. (2002) From Children's Services to Children's Spaces. London: RoutlegeFalmer.
36.
PressF. & WoodrowC. (2005) Commodification, Corporatisation and Children's Spaces, Australian Journal of Education, 49(3), 278–291.
37.
RoseN. (1989) Governing the Soul: The shaping of the private self. New York: Routledge.
38.
RoseN. (1996a) Governing ‘Advanced’ Liberal Democracies, in BarryA.OsborneT. & RoseN. (Eds) Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism and rationalities of government, 37–64. London: UCL Press.
39.
RoseN. (1996b) Inventing Our Selves: Psychology, power and personhood. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
40.
RoseN. (1999) Powers of Freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
RoseN. (2000) Community, Citizenship, and the Third Way, American Behavioral Scientist, 43(9), 1395–1413.
42.
RoseN. & MillerP. (1992) Political Power beyond the State: Problematics of government, British Journal of Sociology, 43(2), 173–205.
43.
Smart Population Foundation (2006) Helping Australia Raise Confident, Curious, Healthy Kids. http://www.smartpopulation.org (accessed 6 May, 2006).
44.
SotoL.D. (Ed.) (2000) The Politics of Early Childhood Education. New York: Peter Land Publishing.
45.
StanleyF.RichardsonS. & PriorM. (2005) Children of the Lucky Country? How Australia Has Turned Its Back on Children and Why Children Matter. Sydney: Macmillan.
46.
TaylorS.RizviF.LingardB. & HenryM. (1997) Educational Policy and the Politics of Change. London and New York: Routlege.
47.
WalkerdineV. (1984) Developmental Psychology and the Child-centered Pedagogy: The insertion of Piaget into early education, in HenriquesJ.HollwayW.UrwinC.VennC. & WalkerdineV. (Eds.) Changing the Subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity, 153–202. London and New York: Methuen.
48.
WoodrowC. & BrennanM. (1999) Marketised Positioning of Early Childhood: New contexts for curriculum and professional development in Queensland, Australia, Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 1(1), 78–94.
