Teacher Change in an Era of Neo-Liberal Policies: A Neo-Institutional Analysis of Teachers' Perceptions of Their Professional Change

Abstract

The aim of this article is to explore how neo-institutional theory may be applied as an analytical framework to investigate the relationships between teachers' perceptions on their professional change on the one hand, and the numerous change efforts embedded in recent neo-liberal educational policies in Norway on the other. Based on biographical interviews with Norwegian teachers, it is argued that the dynamics of change can be investigated in light of teachers' institutionalised practices within a certain set of governing mechanisms including regulative rules, norms and cultural-cognitive beliefs. The findings suggest that vital, regulative elements in recent neoliberal policies have managed to penetrate the teachers' perceptions of their classroom practices, in a process that is framed by teachers' pre-existing normative values and the cultural scripts guiding their practices. This article concludes that the neo-institutional analytical framework may serve as a sound approach to investigate and compare how issues of teacher change are unfolding across European education systems and policies.

References

Aasen

Prøitz

T.S.

& Sandberg

(2013) Knowledge Regimes and Contradictions in Education Reforms, Educational Policy, 27(2), 1–21. http://doi:10.1177/0895904813475710

Alexiadou

Fink-Hafner

& Lange

(2010) Education Policy Convergence through the Open Method of Coordination: Theoretical reflections and implementation in ‘old’ and ‘new’ national contexts, European Educational Research Journal, 9(3), 345–358. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.2304/eerj.2010.9.3.345

Bakken

& Elstad

J.I.

(2012) For store forventninger? Kunnskapsløftet og ulikhetene i Grunnskolekarakterer [Too great expectations? The knowledge promotion and the variations in grades]. Rapport 7/12. Oslo: NOVA.

Ball

S.J.

(2003) The Teacher's Soul and the Terrors of Performativity, Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/0268093022000043065

Ball

S.J.

& Goodson

(Eds) (1985) Teachers Lives and Careers. London: Falmer Press.

Battilana

(2006) Agency and Institutions: The enabling role of individuals' social position, Organization, 13(5), 653–676. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/1350508406067008

Battilana

Leca

& Boxenbaum

(2009) How Actors Change Institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship, Academy of Management Annals, 3, 65–107. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/19416520903053598

Blossing

Imsen

& Moos

(2014) Nordic Schools in a Time of Change, in Blossing

Imsen

& Moos

(Eds) The Nordic Education Model: ‘A School for All’ encounters neo-liberal policy. Dordrecht: Springer.

Coburn

C.E.

(2004) Beyond Decoupling: Rethinking the relationship between the institutional environment and the classroom, Sociology of Education, 77(3), 211–244. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/003804070407700302

10.

Cuban

(1993) How Teachers Taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms, 1890–1990. 2nd edn. New York: Teachers College Press.

11.

Dewey

(1990) The School and Society, in Jackson

P.W.

(Ed.) The Child and the Curriculum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

12.

DiMaggio

P.J.

& Powell

W.W.

(1983) The Iron Cage Revisited — institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields, American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.2307/2095101

13.

DiMaggio

P.J.

& Powell

W.W.

(1991) Introduction, in DiMaggio

P.J.

& Powell

W.W.

(Eds) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, pp. 1–38. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

14.

Elmore

R.F.

(1996) Getting to Scale with Good Educational Practice, Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 1–26.

15.

Elstad

& Sivesind

(2010) PISA: Sannheten om skolen? [PISA: The truth about the school?]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

16.

Eurydice (2012) Key Data on Education in Europe 2012. http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice%20/documents/key_data_series/134EN.pdf (accessed September 9, 2013).

17.

Fullan

(1982) The Meaning of Educational Change. New York: Teachers College Press.

18.

Fylling

(2003) Synteserapport for prosjekt: ‘Organisering av spesialundervisning i kjølvannet av Reform -97: Nye arbeidsformer — nye løsninger?’ [A synthesis-report for the project: ‘The organizing of special education in the wake of Reform 97: New ways of working — new solutions?’]. Bodø: Nordlandsforskning.

19.

Goodlad

J. I.

(1984) A Place called School: Prospects for the future. New York: McGraw-Hill.

20.

Goodson

, (Ed.) (1992) Studying Teachers Lives. London: Routledge. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.4324/9780203415177

21.

Grek

(2009) Governing by Numbers: The PISA ‘effect’ in Europe, Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23–37. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/02680930802412669

22.

Grek

Lawn

Lingard

& Varjo

(2009) North by Northwest: Quality assurance and evaluation processes in European education, Journal of Education Policy, 24(2), 121–133. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/02680930902733022

23.

Guskey

T.R.

(1989) Attitude and Perceptual Change in Teachers, International Journal of Educational Research, 13(4), 439–453. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/0883-0355(89)90039-6

24.

Guskey

T.R.

(2010) Professional Development and Teacher Change, Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381–391. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/135406002100000512

25.

Hargreaves

(2002) Sustainability of Educational Change: The role of social geographies, Journal of Educational Change, 3(3–4), 189–214.

26.

Helgøy

Homme

& Gewirtz

(2007) Introduction to Special Issue on Local Autonomy or State Control? Exploring the Effects of New Forms of Regulation in Education, European Educational Research Journal, 6(3), 198–202. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.2304/eerj.2007.6.3.198

27.

Hirsch

P.M.

& Lounsbury

(1997) Ending the Family Quarrel: Towards a reconciliation of ‘old’ and ‘new’ institutionalism, American Behavioral Scientist, 40(4), 406–418. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/0002764297040004004

28.

Huberman

(1992) Teacher Development and Instructional Mastery, in Hargreaves

& Fullan

M.G.

(Eds) Understanding Teacher Development, pp. 122–142. New York: Teachers College Press.

29.

Hudson

(2007) Governing the Governance of Education: The state strikes back?, European Educational Research Journal, 6(3), 266–282. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.2304/eerj.2007.6.3.266

30.

Imsen

(2003) Skolemiljø, læringsmiljø og elevutbytte / en empirisk studie av grunnskolens 4., 7. og 10. trinn [School environment, learning environment and student outcomes: An empirical study of 4th, 7th and 10th grade in primary and lower secondary education]. Trondheim: Tapir akademisk forlag.

31.

Joyce

B.R.

McNair

K.M.

Diaz

& McKibbin

M.D.

(1976) Interviews: Perceptions of professionals and policy makers. Stanford, CA: Stanford Center for Research and Development in Teaching.

32.

Karseth

& Sivesind

(2010) Conceptualising Curriculum Knowledge Within and Beyond the National Context, European Journal of Education, 45(1), 103–120. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2009.01418.x

33.

Klette

(2003) Klasserommets praksisformer etter Reform 97 [The work in classrooms after Reform 97]. Evaluering av Reform 97. Rapport no. 1 [An evaluation of Reform 97. Report no. 1] Oslo: Unipub AS.

34.

Kjærnsli

& Roe

(Eds) (2010) På rett spor: Norske elevers kompetanse i naturfag, lesing og matematikk [On the right track: Norwegian students' competence in natural sciences, reading literacy, and numeracy]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

35.

Lawn

(2006) Soft Governance and the Learning Spaces of Europe, Comparative European Politics, 4(2), 272–288. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110081

36.

Lawn

(2011) Governing through Data in English Education, Education Inquiry, 2(2), 277–288. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.3402/edui.v2i2.21980

37.

Levin

(1998) An Epidemic of Education Policy: (what) can we learn from each other?, Comparative Education, 34(2), 131–141. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/03050069828234

38.

Little

J.W.

(1990) The Persistence of Privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers' professional relations, Teachers College Record, 91(4), 509–536.

39.

Lortie

D.C.

(1975) Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

40.

Mausethagen

(2013) A Research Review of the Impact of Accountability Policies on Teachers' Workplace Relations, Educational Research Review, 9, 16–33. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.edurev.2012.12.001

41.

Merriam

(1997) Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

42.

Meyer

J.W.

& Rowan

(1977) Institutionalized Organizations: Formal structures as myth and ceremony, American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1086/226550

43.

Ministry of Education (2003–2004) White Paper No. 30. Kultur for læring [A culture for learning]. Oslo: Ministry of Education

44.

Ministry of Education (2006–2007) White Paper No. 16. og ingen sto igjen. Tidlig innsats for livslang læring [Early intervention for lifelong learning]. Oslo: Ministry of Education.

45.

Moos

Krejsler

& Kofod

K.K.

(2008) Successful Principals: Telling or selling? On the Importance of Context for School Leadership, International Journal of Leadership in Education, 11(4), 341–352. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/13603120802183913

46.

Moos

& Møller

(2010) Schools and Leadership in Transition: The case of Scandinavia, Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 353–370. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/0305764032000122014

47.

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2009) Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environments. First Results from TALIS. Paris: OECD Publications.

48.

Oliver

(1991) Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes, Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.

49.

Olsen

J.P.

(2009) Change and Continuity: An institutional approach to institutions of democratic government, European Political Science Review, 1(1), 3–32. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1017/S1755773909000022

50.

Patton

M.Q.

(2001) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

51.

Sarason

S.B.

(1971) The Culture of the School and the Problem of Change. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

52.

Sarason

S.B.

(1990) The Predictable Failure of Educational Reform: Can we change course before it's too late? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

53.

Scriven

(1969) The Methodology of Evaluation, in Tyler

R.W.

Gagné

R.M.

& Scriven

(Eds.) Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation. Chicago: Rand McNally.

54.

Scott

W.R.

(1995) Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

55.

Scott

W.R.

(2008a) Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and interests. 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

56.

Scott

W.R.

(2008b) Lords of the Dance: Professionals as institutional agents, Organization Studies, 29(2), 219–238. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/0170840607088151

57.

Selznick

(1949) TVA and the Grass Roots: A study in the sociology of formal organization. Berkeley: University of California Press.

58.

Selznick

(1957) Leadership in Administration: A sociological interpretation. New York: Harper & Row.

59.

Sikes

Measor

& Woods

(1985) Teachers Careers. Crisis and Continuities. London: Falmer Press.

60.

Steiner-Khamsi

(2010) The Politics and Economics of Comparison. CIES 2012 Presidential Address, Comparative Education Review, 54(3), 323–342.

61.

Stinchcombe

A.L.

(1997) On the Virtues of the Old Institutionalism, Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 1–18. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.1

62.

Telhaug

A.O.

(2006) Skolen mellom stat og marked. Norsk skoletenkning fra år til år 1990–2005 [The school between state and market. Norwegian education policy from 1990 to 2005]. Oslo: Didakta norsk forlag.

63.

Thelen

K.A.

& Mahoney

(2010) Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.