Infants in Family Day Care: Stories of Smooth and Striated Space

Abstract

Family day care (FDC) is child care for a small group of children that occurs in the educator's home. Despite the important role it plays in the international early childhood education and care landscape, particularly for children under three years of age, FDC is currently under-researched. This article examines research about infants (under 19 months of age) in FDC from the past 20 years, using Deleuze and Guattari's concepts of smooth and striated space. These concepts open possibilities for moving beyond well-worn binaries such as qualitative/quantitative, researcher/researched, adult/infant and instead consider the methodological principles and theoretical perspectives that influence why particular methods are chosen, how they are used, and the research stories that result. The authors argue that the emerging FDC research space may be conceptualised as a smooth space, with greater powers of deterritorialisation than the striated, affording lines of flight towards new understandings about the lives of infants in FDC.

References

Arnett

(1989) Caregivers in Day-Care Centres: Does training matter? Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 10, 541–552. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/0193–3973(89)90026–9.

Australian Associated Press (2008) Mem Fox Slammed for Childcare Comments, The Australian, 31 August. http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/mem-fox-slammed-for-childcare-comments/story-e6frg6nf-1111117351355.

Australian Children's Education & Care Quality Authority (2011) Guide to the National Quality Framework. http://www.acecqa.gov.au/Uploads/files/National%20Quality%20Framework%20Resources%20Kit/1%20Guide%20to%20the%20NQF.pdf.

Bessell

(2009) Research with Children: Thinking about method and methodology, in Australian Research Alliance for Children and Youth & New South Wales Commission for Children and Young People (Eds) Involving Children and Young People in Research. http://www.childhealthresearch.org.au/media/54379/involvingchildrenandyoungpeopleinresearch_1_.pdf.

Bordin

Machida

Varnell

(2000) The Relation of Quality Indicators to Provider Knowledge of Child Development in Family Child Care Homes, Child & Youth Care Forum, 29(5), 323–341. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1023/A:1016662011920.

Bradley

Sumsion

Stratigos

Elwick

(2012) Baby Events: Assembling descriptions of infants in family day care, Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 13(2), 141–153. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.2304/ciec.2012.13.2.141.

Burchinal

Howes

Kontos

(2002) Structural Predictors of Child Care Quality in Child Care Homes, Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17(1), 87–105. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/S0885–2006(02)00132–1.

Clarke-Stewart

K.A.

Vandell

D.L.

Burchinal

O'Brien

McCartney

(2002) Do Regulable Features of Child-care Homes Affect Children's Development? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17(1), 52–86. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/S0885–2006(02)00133–3.

Dahlberg

Moss

Pence

(2007) Beyond Quality in Early Childhood Education and Care: Languages of evaluation, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.

10.

Davis

Harrison

Priest

Williamson

(2011) Australian Family Day Care Educators: A snapshot of their qualifications, training and perceived support, Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 36(4), 63–68.

11.

Deleuze

Guattari

(1987) A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism & schizophrenia. London: Athlone Press.

12.

Department of Education Employment and Workforce Relations (2008) 2006 Australian Government Census of Child Care Services. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. http://foi.deewr.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/2006_australian_government_census_of_child_care_services.pdf.

13.

Department of Education Employment and Workforce Relations (2009) Belonging, Being, Becoming: The early years learning framework for Australia. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. http://foi.deewr.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/belonging_being_and_becoming_the_early_years_learning_framework_for_australia.pdf.

14.

Department of Education Employment and Workforce Relations (2012) Child Care Update: September quarter 2011. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. http://foi.deewr.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/child_care_update20110810.pdf.

15.

Elicker

Fortner-Wood

Noppe

I.C.

(1999) The Context of Infant Attachment in Family Child Care, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 20(2), 319–336. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/S0193–3973(99)00019–2.

16.

Family Day Care Australia (2008) Submission to the Productivity Inquiry: Paid maternity, paternity and parental leave. http://www.ymca.org.au/about/pub/Documents/YMCA%20Australia%20Submission%20to%20Productivity%20Commission%20Inquiry%20into%20Paid%20Parental%20Leave.pdf.

17.

Family Day Care Australia (2009) Family Day Care Australia Response to Senate Inquiry into the Provision of Child Care. http://ncac.acecqa.gov.au/reports/report-documents/senate.pdf.

18.

Fenech

(2011) An Analysis of the Conceptualisation of ‘Quality’ in Early Childhood Education and Care Empirical Research: Promoting ‘blind spots’ as foci for future research, Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 12(2), 102–117. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.2304/ciec.2011.12.2.102.

19.

Frank

A.W.

(2004) After Methods, the Story: From incongruity to truth in qualitative research, Qualitative Health Research, 14(3), 430–440. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/1049732303261955.

20.

Freeman

(2011) Reggio Emilia, Vygotsky, and Family Childcare: Four American providers describe their pedagogical practice, Child Care in Practice, 17(3), 227–246. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/13575279.2011.571236.

21.

Freeman

Vakil

(2007) The Pedagogical Experiences and Practices of Family Child Care Providers, Early Childhood Education Journal, 35(3), 269–276. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1007/s10643-007-0152-0.

22.

Goodfellow

(2012) Looking, Listening-in and Making Meaning: An infant's encounters at childcare, Early Childhood Folio, 16(1), 22–26.

23.

Greenberg

M.J.

(2008) Euclidean and Non-Euclidean Geometries: Development and history, 4th edn. New York: W.H. Freeman.

24.

Harms

Clifford

R.M.

(1989) Family Day Care Rating Scale. New York: Teachers College Press.

25.

Henderson

D.W.

Taimina

(2001) Crocheting the Hyperbolic Plane, Mathematical Intelligencer, 23(2), 17. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1007/BF03026623.

26.

Howes

(1997) Teacher Sensitivity, Children's Attachment and Play with Peers, Early Education & Development, 8(1), 41–49. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1207/s15566935eed0801_4.

27.

Institute for Figuring (n.d.) Hyperbolic Space Online Exhibit. http://www.theiff.org/oexhibits/oe1.html (accessed 13 March 2013).

28.

Ishimine

Tayler

(2012) Family Day Care and the National Quality Framework: Issues in improving quality of service, International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 6(1), 45–61.

29.

Kryzer

E.M.

Kovan

Phillips

D.A.

Domagall

L.A.

Gunnar

M.R.

(2007) Toddlers' and Preschoolers’ Experience in Family Day Care: Age differences and behavioral correlates, Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 22(4), 451–466. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/j.ecresq.2007.08.004.

30.

Layzer

J.I.

Goodson

B.D.

(2006) The ‘Quality’ of Early Care and Education Settings, Evaluation Review, 30(5), 556–576. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/0193841X06291524.

31.

Mander

Danaher

P.A.

Tyler

M.A.

Midgley

(2011) Constructing and Deconstructing Binaries in Education Research, in Midgley

Tyler

M.A.

Danaher

P.A.

Mander

(Eds) Beyond Binaries in Education Research. New York: Routledge.

32.

Massumi

(2010) What Concepts Do: Preface to the Chinese translation of a thousand plateaus, Deleuze Studies, 4(1), 1–15. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.3366/E1750224110000772.

33.

Mazzei

L.A.

Jackson

A.Y.

(2012) Complicating Voice in a Refusal to ‘Let Participants Speak for Themselves’, Qualitative Inquiry, 18(9), 745–751. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/1077800412453017.

34.

O'Connell

(2010) (How) is Childminding Family Like? Family Day Care, Food and the Reproduction of Identity at the Public/Private Interface, Sociological Review, 58(4), 563–586. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1111/j.1467–954 X.2010.01940.x.

35.

Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (1989) United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/crc.pdf.

36.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2006) Starting Strong II: Early childhood education and care. http://www.oecd.org/newsroom/37425999.pdf.

37.

Owen

(2000) Assessing Quality in Childminding, Children & Society, 14(2), 147–153. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1111/j.1099–0860.2000.tb00162.x.

38.

Plotnitsky

(2006) Manifolds: On the concept of space in Riemann and Deleuze, in Duffy

(Ed.) Virtual Mathematics: The logic of difference. Manchester: Clinamen Press.

39.

Plotnitsky

(2009) Bernhard Riemann, in Jones

Roffe

(Eds) Deleuze's Philosophical Lineage. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

40.

Press

Bradley

Goodfellow

Harrison

McLeod

Sumsion

Stratigos

(2011) Listening to Infants About What Life is Like in Childcare: A mosaic approach, in Roulstone

McLeod

(Eds) Listening to Children and Young People with Speech, Language and Communication Needs. London: J&R Press.

41.

Pugach

M.C.

(2001) The Stories We Choose to Tell: Fulfilling the promise of qualitative research for special education, Exceptional Children, 67(4), 439–453.

42.

Saggers

Grant

(1999) I Love Children, and Four-pence a Week is Four-pence!: Contradictions of caring in family day care, Journal of Family Studies, 5(1), 69–83. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.5172/jfs.5.1.69.

43.

Saggers

Grant

Woodhead

Banham

(1994) The Professionalisation of Mothering: Family day care, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 30(3), 273–288. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/144078339403000303.

44.

Singh

(2011) Foreword: Renewing the critical function of education research, in Midgley

Tyler

M.A.

Danaher

P.A.

Mander

(Eds) Beyond Binaries in Education Research. New York: Routledge.

45.

Siraj-Blatchford

Sammons

Taggart

Sylva

Melhuish

(2006) Educational Research and Evidence-based Policy: The mixed-method approach of the EPPE project, Evaluation & Research in Education, 19(2), 63–82. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.2167/eri419.0.

46.

Statham

Mooney

(2003) Across the Spectrum: An introduction to family day care internationally, in Mooney

Statham

(Eds) Family Day Care: International perspectives on policy, practice and quality. London: Jessica Kingsley.

47.

Sumsion

Bradley

Stratigos

Elwick

(in press) ‘Baby Cam’ and Participatory Research with Infants: A case study of critical reflexivity, in Fleer

Ridgeway

(Eds) Visual Methodologies: International perspectives on early education and development. Dordrecht: Springer.

48.

Sumsion

Goodfellow

(2012) ‘Looking and Listening-in’: A methodological approach to generating insights into infants' experiences of early childhood education and care settings, European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 20(3), 313–327. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/1350293X.2012.704758.

49.

Sumsion

Harrison

Press

McLeod

Goodfellow

Bradley

(2011) Researching Infants' Experiences of Early Childhood Education and Care, in Harcourt

Perry

Waller

(Eds) Researching Young Children's Perspectives: Debating the ethics and dilemmas of educational research with children. London: Routledge.

50.

Totaro

(2006) Day Care is Bad for Babies – Biddulph, Sydney Morning Herald, 18 March. http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/day-care-is-bad-for-babies-biddulph/2006/03/17/1142582520873.html.

51.

United Nations Children's Fund (2008) The Child Care Transition: A league table of early childhood education and care in economically advanced countries. Innocenti Report Card 8. http://www.unicef.org.au/downloads/publications/Report-card-8-JUNE-17-2008.aspx.

52.

Vandell

D.L.

(1996) Characteristics of Infant Child Care: Factors contributing to positive caregiving, Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 11(3), 269–306. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1016/S0885–2006(96)90009–5.

53.

Wertheim

(2009) The Beautiful Math of Coral. TED Conference, Long Beach, CA. http://www.ted.com/talks/margaret_wertheim_crochets_the_coral_reef.html.

54.

Wise

(2002) Parents' Expectations, Values and Choice of Child Care: Connections to culture, Family Matters, 61, 48–55.

55.

Wise

Sanson

(2003) Partnerships with Providers? Why Parents from Diverse Cultural Backgrounds Choose Family Day Care, in Mooney

Statham

(Eds) Family Day Care: International perspectives on policy, practice and quality. London: Jessica Kingsley.

56.

Wong

Cumming

(2010) Family Day Care is for Normal Kids: Facilitators and barriers to the inclusion of children with disabilities in family day care, Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 35(3), 4–12.