This interview attempts to articulate what it might mean to speak for ‘Pädagogik’ in an era where new trends in education run the risk of marginalizing ‘Pädagogik’ as an independent academic discipline. This trend can be found in several European countries and is judged by Herner Saeverot and Gert Biesta to be a development that is cause for concern.
References
1.
BiestaG.J.J. (2006) Beyond Learning. Democratic Education for a Human Future. Boulder: Paradigm.
2.
BiestaG.J.J. (2009) On the Weakness of Education, in KerdemanDeborah (Eds) Philosophy of Education 2009, pp. 354–362. Urbana-Champaign, IL: Philosophy of Education Society.
3.
BiestaG.J.J. (2010) Good Education in an Age of Measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Boulder: Paradigm.
4.
BiestaG.J.J. (2011) Disciplines and Theory in the Academic Study of Education: A comparative analysis of the Anglo–American and Continental construction of the field, Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 19(2), 175–192. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/14681366.2011.582255
Norges forskningsråd [The Research Council of Norway] (2008a) Programplan for Utdanning 2020. Norsk utdanningsforskning fram mot 2020 (2009–2018) [Program Plan for Utdanning 2020 (2009–2018)]). Oslo: NFR.
10.
Norges forskningsråd [The Research Council of Norway] (2008b) Work Programme. Norwegian Educational Research towards 2020 - UTDANNING2020. Oslo: NFR.
11.
RancièreJ. (1991) The Ignorant Schoolmaster: Five lessons in intellectual emancipation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
12.
RancièreJ. (2004) The Philosopher and His Poor. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
13.
SæverotH.TorgersenG.E. (2012) Pedagogikk er ikke et bindestreksfag [Pedagogikk is not a hyphen-subject], Norsk pedagogisk tidsskrift, 96(1), 70–75.
