Research methods teaching in psychology is predominantly divided into quantitative and qualitative modules, often with an emphasis on the former. In this article we argue that by explicitly addressing the integration of methodological approaches we may help to improve students' understanding of psychological research methods overall. The example of a final year module is provided, outlining the use of a student-led classroom debate on the compatibility of qualitative and quantitative methodologies in psychology. This type of learning activity was introduced to encourage a deeper understanding of the module content and to move toward student-centred learning. It is concluded that the relative success of the debate depended largely on the size of the class and the willingness of the students to partake in a non-assessed, planned activity. Suggestions are provided for how the debate could have been better managed, alongside alternative ways in which the whole module may be redesigned.
References
1.
AndersonT.HoweC.SodenR.HallidayJ.LowJ. (2001). Peer interaction and the learning of critical thinking skills in further education students. International Science, 29, 1–32.
2.
AndersonT.SodenR. (2001). Peer interaction and the learning of critical thinking skills. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 1, 37–40.
3.
BensonA.BlackmanD. (2003). Can research methods ever be interesting?Active Learning in Higher Education, 4, 39–55.
4.
BiggsJ. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: Open University Press.
5.
BrownS.RaceP.RustC. (1995). Using and experiencing assessment. In KnightP. (Ed.) Assessment for learning in higher education (pp. 75–85). London: Kogan Page.
6.
ChanV. (2001). Learning autonomously: The learners' perspectives. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 25, 85–300.
7.
DeaconD.BrymanA.FentonN. (1998). Collision or collusion? A discussion of the unplanned triangulation of quantitative and qualitative research methods. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 1, 47–64.
8.
FootH.HoweC. (1998). The psychoeducational basis of peer-assisted learning. In ToppingK.EhlyS. (Eds.) Peer assisted learning (pp.27–43). London: LEA.
9.
HarlosK. P.MallonM.StableinR.JonesC. (2003). Teaching qualitative methods in management classrooms. Journal of Management Education, 27, 304–322.
10.
HelmanS.HorswillM. S. (2002). Does the introduction of non-traditional teaching techniques improve psychology undergraduates' performance in statistics?Psychology Learning and Teaching, 2, 12–16.
11.
HopkinsonG. C.HoggM. K. (2004). Teaching and learning about qualitative resarch in the social sciences: An experiential learning approach amongst marketing students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 28, 307–320.
12.
LeaS. J.StephensonD.TroyJ. (2003). Higher education students' attitudes to student-centred learning: Beyond ‘educational bulimia’. Studies in Higher Education, 28, 321–334.
13.
MarshallL.RowlandsF. (1998). A guide to learning independently (3rd edition). Melbourne, Australia: Longman.
14.
MilesM.HubermanM. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
NicolD. J.BoyleJ. T. (2003). Peer instruction versus class-wide discussion in large classes: A comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom. Studies in Higher Education, 28, 457–473.
16.
NortonL. S.TilleyA. J.NewsteadS. E.Franklyn-StokesA. (2001). The pressures of assessment in undergraduate courses and their effect on student behaviours. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26, 269–284.
17.
PeekeG. (1993). Issues and problems in implementing student centred learning with adults. Journal of Teacher Development, 2, 46–52.
18.
ReynoldsM. (1994). Groupwork in education and training: Ideas in practice. London: Kogan Page.
19.
RimieneV. (2002). Assessing and developing students' critical thinking. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 2, 7–22.
20.
ScottJ.BuchananJ.HaighN. (1997). Reflections on student-centred learning in a large class setting. British Journal of Educational Technology, 28, 19–30.
21.
SharmaM. D.MillarR.SethS. (1999). Workshop tutorials: Accommodating student-centred learning in large first year university physics courses. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 839–853.
22.
TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (2003). Issues and dilemmas in teaching research methods courses in social and behavioural sciences: US perspective. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 6, 61–77.
23.
ToddZ.NerlichB.McKeownS. (2004). Introduction. In ToddZ.NerlichB.McKeownS.ClarkeD. D. (Eds.) Mixing methods in psychology: The integration of qualitative and quantitative methods in theory and practice (pp. 3–16). Hove: Psychology Press.
24.
WalkerA. (2001). British psychology students' perceptions of group-work and peer assessment. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 1, 28–36.
25.
WiseA. (2003). Web-based puzzle program to assist students' understanding of research methods. Active Learning in Higher Education, 4, 93–202.
