Through the Looking Glass: Publishing in Peer-Reviewed Academic Journals

Abstract

This article considers some of the issues of power embedded in publishing in academic journals. It asks questions about the way in which individual scholars and researchers might be empowered within a hierarchical system in which getting funding and getting published are closely allied. Four concepts borrowed from diverse sources (creative power, the power of disbelief, power as freedom and decisive preference) act as running stitches through an auto/biographical account of the author's return to the academy after an absence of several years. Showing how the author exercised power as a PhD student, the author concludes on a polemical but somewhat speculative note as a scholar who has yet to find a home.

References

Abraham

(2008) Politics, Knowledge and Objectivity in Sociology of Education: A response to the case for ‘ethical reflexivity’ by Gewirtz and Cribb, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27(2), 537–548. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/01425690802263692.

Alkire

(2008) Using the Capability Approach: Prospective and evaluative analyses, in Comim

Qizilbash

Alkire

(Eds) The Capability Approach: Concepts, measures and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1017/CBO9780511492587.002.

Baudrillard

(1993) Symbolic Exchange and Death. London: Sage.

Bourdieu

(2003) Against Objectivism: The reality of the social fiction, in Sikes

Nixon

Carr

(Eds) The Moral Foundations of Educational Research: Knowledge, inquiry, values. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Cohen

(1993) Equality of What? On Welfare, Goods, and Capabilities, in Nussbaum

Sen

(Eds) The Quality of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Delamont

(2004) Confessions of a Ragpicker, in Piper

Stronach

(Eds) Educational Research: Difference and diversity. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Delamont

(2009) The Only Honest Thing: Autoethnography, reflexivity and small crises in fieldwork, Ethnography and Education, 4(1), 51–63. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/17457820802703507.

Drèze

Sen

(1995) India: Development and participation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Elster

(1983) Sour Grapes: Studies in the subversion of rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

10.

Flyvbjerg

(2006) Five Misunderstandings about Case-Study Research, Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1177/1077800405284363.

11.

Gewirtz

Cribb

(2008) Differing to Agree: A reply to Hammersley and Abraham, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29(5), 559–562. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/01425690802381577.

12.

Goodson

Sikes

(2001) Doing Life History in Educational Settings: Learning from lives. Buckingham: Open University Press.

13.

Hammersley

(2008) Reflexivity for What? A Response to Gewirtz and Cribb on the Role of Values in the Sociology of Education, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29(5), 549–558. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/01425690802263718.

14.

Hey

(2004) Perverse Pleasures, Identity Work and the Paradoxes of Greedy Institutions, Journal of International Women's Studies, 5(3), 33–43.

15.

Hooks

(2000) Feminist Theory: From margin to centre, 2nd edn. London: Pluto Press.

16.

Levering

Ramaekers

Smeyers

(2009) The Narrative of a Happy Childhood: On the presumption of parents' power and the demand for integrity, Power and Education, 1(1), 83–93. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.2304/power.2009.1.1.83.

17.

Mahony

Zmroczek

(1997) Why Class Matters, in Mahony

Zmroczek

(Eds) Class Matters: ‘working-class’ women's perspectives on social class. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.

18.

McGettigan

(1998) Redefining Reality: Epiphany as standard of postmodern truth, Electronic Journal of Sociology. http://www.sociology.org/content/vol003.004/mcgettigan.html.

19.

Nussbaum

(2000) Women and Human Development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

20.

Nussbaum

(2001) Upheavals of Thought: The intelligence of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

21.

Parker

(1998) PhD Students and the Auto/biographies of Their Learning, in Erben

(Ed.) Biography and Education: A reader. London: Falmer Press.

22.

Pettit

(2001) Symposium on Amartya Sen's Philosophy: 1. Capability and Freedom: A defence of Sen, Economics and Philosophy, 17(1), 1–20. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1017/S0266267101000116.

23.

Quinn

(2003) Powerful Subjects: Are women really taking over the university? Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.

24.

Robeyns

(2003) The Capability Approach: An interdisciplinary introduction. Paper presented at Third International Conference on the Capability Approach, Pavia, Italy, 8–10 September.

25.

Sen

(1982) Choice, Welfare, and Measurement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

26.

Sen

(1992) Inequality Re-examined. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

27.

Sen

(1993) Capability and Well-being, in Nussbaum

Sen

(Eds) The Quality of Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1093/0198287976.003.0003.

28.

Sen

(1999) Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

29.

Sen

(2004) Capabilities, Lists, and Public Reason: Continuing the conversation, Feminist Economics, 10(3), 77–80. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/1354570042000315163.

30.

Stanley

(1992) The Auto/biographical I: The theory and practice of feminist auto/biography. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

31.

Stanley

Wise

(1993) Breaking Out Again: Feminist ontology and epistemology, 2nd edn. Abingdon: Routledge.

32.

Stenhouse

(1980) The Study of Samples and the Study of Cases, British Educational Research Journal, 6(1), 1–6. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/0141192800060101.

33.

Taylor

Downs

Chikwa

Baker

(in press) ‘I did it my way’: Voice, visuality and identity in doctoral students' reflexive videonarratives on their doctoral research journeys, International Journal of Research and Method in Education.

34.

Walker

(2003) Framing Social Justice in Education: What does the ‘capabilities’ approach offer? British Journal of Educational Studies, 51(2), 168–187. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1111/1467–8527.t01-2-00232.

35.

Walker

(2006) Towards a Capability-based Theory of Social Justice for Education Policy-making, Journal of Education Policy, 21(2), 163–185. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.1080/02680930500500245.