BlalockH.1964Causal Inferences in Non-Experimental Research. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.
2.
BohrnstedtG.1968“Observations on the measurement of change”. Pp. 113–133 in BorgattaE. (ed.) Sociological Methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3.
BulloughB.BulloughV.1971“Intellectual achievers: A study of eighteenth century Scotland”. Amer. J. of Sociology76 (May): 1048–1063.
4.
HeiseD.1968“Problems in path analysis and causal inference”. Pp. 38–73 in BorgattaE. (ed.) Sociological Methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
HempelC.1966Philosophy of Natural Science. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
6.
HomansG.1969“Comment”. Pp. 80–85 in BierstedtR. (ed.) A Design for Sociology. Philadelphia: American Academy of Political and Social Science.
7.
KuhnT.1970The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
8.
LandK.1968“Principles of path analysis”. Pp. 3–37 in BorgattaE. (ed.) Sociological Methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9.
MertonR.1957Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.
10.
PopperK.1965Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. New York: Basic Books.
11.
PurtillR.1967“Discussion: Kuhn on scientific revolutions”. Philosophy of Sci.34 (March): 53–58.
12.
RoseA.1967“The relation of theory and method”. Pp. 207–219 in GrossL. (ed.) Sociological Theory: Inquiries and Paradigms. New York: Harper & Row.
13.
SchefflerI.1967Science and Subjectivity. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
14.
ShapereD.1967“The structure of scientific revolutions”. Philosophical Rev.73 (March): 383–394.
15.
SmelserN.1969“The optimum scope of sociology”. Pp. 1–21 in BierstedtR. (ed.) A Design for Sociology. Philadelphia: American Academy of Political and Social Science 9.
