A view of communication technologies as creating artificial agents and affecting the information-processing capabilities of agents is forwarded The constructural theory is adapted to account for agents varying in their information-processing capabilities and, hence, to account for technology. Given this theoretical modification, the constructural model is used to examine the impact of different communication technologies and sociocultural landscapes on the rate at which information diffuses and the time it takes for the society to reach cultural homogeneity and consensus. The findings suggest that as the available communication technologies change, the role of the sociocultural landscape in effecting social change varies. Paradoxically, this research suggests that mass-communication technologies that enable greater competition among messages and greater message complexity will enable faster information diffusion than will those technologies that inhibit competition and message complexity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AxelrodRobert1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
2.
BeckerM. H.1970. “Sociometric Location and Innovativeness: Reformulation and Extension of the Diffusion Model.”American Sociological Review35: 267–282.
3.
BlauPeter M.1967. Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley.
4.
BlauPeter M.1977. Inequality and Heterogeneity. New York: The Free Press of Macmillan Co.
5.
BledsteinB.1976. The Culture of Professionalism. New York: Norton.
6.
BurtRonald S.1973. “The Differential Impact of Social Integration on Participation in the Diffusion of Innovations.”Social Science Research2: 125–144.
7.
BurtRonald S.1980. “Innovation as a Structural Interest: Rethinking the Impact of Network Position Innovation Adoption.”Social Networks4: 337–355.
8.
CarleyKathleen M.1990. “Group Stability: A Socio-Cognitive Approach.” Pp. 1–44 in Advances in Group Processes, Vol. 7, edited by LawlerE.MarkovskyB.RidgewayC.WalkerH.Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
9.
CarleyKathleen M.1991a. “A Theory of Group Stability.”American Sociological Review56: 331–354.
10.
CarleyKathleen M.1991b. “Growing Up: The Development and Acquisition of Social Knowledge.” Pp. 75–102 in The Self-Society Dynamic: Cognition, Emotion and Action, edited by HowardJ. A.CalleroP. L.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11.
CarleyKathleen M.NewellAllen1994. “The Nature of the Social Agent.”Journal of Mathematical Sociology19(4): 221–262.
12.
ColemanJames SamuelKatzElihuMenzelHerbert1966. Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.
13.
CollinsR.1979. The Credential Society: An Historical Sociology of Education and Stratification. New York: Academic.
14.
del Sola PooleI., ed. 1977. The Social Impact of the Telephone. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
EisensteinE. L.1979. The Printing Press as an Agent of Change: Communications and Cultural Transformations in Early Modern Europe. 2 Vols.London: Cambridge University Press.
16.
EnosR. L., ed. 1990Oral and Written Communication: Historical Approaches. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17.
FreemanLinton C.1984. “Impact of Computer-Based Communication on the Social Structure of an Emerging Scientific Specialty.”Social Networks6: 201–221.
18.
GiddensA.1987. “Structuralism, Post-structuralism and the Production of Culture.” Pp. 195–223 in Social Theory Today, edited by GiddensA.TurnerJ.Palo-Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
19.
GoodyJ.1986. The Logic of Writing and the Organization of Society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20.
GranovetterMark S.1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.”American Journal of Sociology68 (May): 1360–1380.
21.
GranovetterMark S.1974. Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
HiltzS. R.TuroffM.1978. The Network Nation: Human Communication via Computer. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
23.
HomansGeorge C.1950. The Human Group. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.
24.
InnisH.1951. The Bias of Communication. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
25.
KatzE.LevinM. L.HamiltonH.1963. “Traditions of Research on the Diffusion of Innovations.”American Sociological Review28: 237–253.
26.
KauferDavidCarleyKathleen M.1993. Communication at a Distance: The Effects of Print on Socio-cultural Organization and Change. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
KieslerS.SiegelJ.McGuireT.1984. “Social Psychological Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication.”American Psychologist39: 1123–1134.
28.
LinN.BurtR. S.1975. “Differential Effects of Information Channels in the Process of Innovation Diffusion.”Social Forces54: 256–274.
29.
LippmanW. (1922). Public Opinion. New York: Macmillan.
30.
de S. PriceD. J.1965. “Networks of Scientific Papers.”Science149: 510–515.
31.
RapoportAnatol1953. “Spread of Information Through a Population with Socio-Structural Bias: I. Assumption of transitivity. II. Various Models with Partial Transitivity.”Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics15: 523–546.
32.
ReynoldsL. D.WilsonN. G.1968. Scribes and Scholars: A Guide to the Transmission of Greek and Latin Literature. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
33.
RiceR. E.1984. The New Media: Communication, Research, and Technology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
34.
RiceR. E.CaseD.1983. “Electronic Message Systems in the University: A Description of Use and Utility.”Journal of Communication33: 131–152.
35.
RogersEvrett M.1983. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.
36.
SproullLeeKieslerSara1986. “Reducing Social Context Cues: Electronic Mail in Organizational Communication.”Management Science32: 1492–1512.
37.
SproullLeeKieslerSara1991. Connections: New ways of Working in the Networked Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38.
TurnerJ. H.1988. A Theory of Social Interaction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
39.
WhiteHarrison C.1992. Identity and Control: A Structural Theory of Social Action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40.
WilliamsR.1961. The Long Revolution. New York: Columbia University Press.
