The People of the Forest against International Capitalism: Systemic and Anti-Systemic Forces in the Battle for the Preservation of the Brazilian Amazon Rainforest
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 1996
The People of the Forest against International Capitalism: Systemic and Anti-Systemic Forces in the Battle for the Preservation of the Brazilian Amazon Rainforest
The paper links the rapid deforestation taking place in the Brazilian Amazon rainforest to the alliance of the Brazilian government with world-systemic or global institutions in developing Amazonia. This alliance accelerated the pace of destruction by extending the capitalist frontier into the region, with devastating consequences for the people of the forest, (i.e*** Indians, rubber tappers, etc.) The paper argues that changes in the ecopolitics of the world-system beginning in the mid-1980's strengthened the cause of the people of the forest against the systemic agents of destruction. They won important allies abroad, while the Brazilian government lost allies. The political leverage gained by the people of the forest allowed them to win a few important victories in attempting to preserve their lands and livelihoods. Pressured by international demand, the Brazilian government agreed to create extractive reserves and to demarcate Indian lands. The paper concludes that a country-by-country approach to the problem of deforestation is insufficient. The world-system must be taken into account for a more comprehensive picture of the problem. I also argue, however, that internal or national processes are also critical for our understanding of environmental problems in the Third World. The world-system and national processes interact.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
“Aeronautica cede helicopteros para Ibama fiscalizar queimada,”Jornal do Brasil, July 14, 1990, 1$ Caderno, p. 5.
2.
BarbosaLuiz. 1993a. “The ‘Greening’ of the Ecopolitics of the World-System: Amazonia and Changes in the Ecopolitics of Brazil.”Journal of Political and Military Sociology21 (1): 107–134.
3.
BarbosaLuiz. 1993b. “The World-System and the Destruction of the Brazilian Rain Forest.”Review (A Journal of the Fernand Braudel Center for the Study of Economies, Historical Systems, and Civilizations)16 (2): 215–240.
4.
BarbosaLuiz. 1990. “Dependencia, Environmental Imperialism and Human Survival: A Critical Essay on the Global Environmental Crisis.”Humanity and Society14: 329–344.
5.
BlackJan Knippers. 1977. United States Penetration of Brazil. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
6.
BranfordSueGlockOriel. 1985. The Last Frontier. London: Zed Books Ltd..
7.
BrasilienseRonaldo. 1991. “Subsolo da reserva ianomami e cobicado por 25 empresas.”Jornal do Brasil, December 8, 1991, 1$ Caderno, p. 14.
8.
Brazil. 1988. Nova Costituicao do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Grafica Auriverde, Ltda.
9.
BunkerStephen G.1985. Underdeveloping the Amazon. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
10.
BunkerStephen G.1980. “Forces of Destruction in Amazonia.”Environment22: 14–42.
11.
CampuzanoJoaquin Molano. 1979. “As multinacionais na Amazonia.”Econtros com a Civilizacao Brasileira11: 21–34.
12.
CaulfieldCatherine. 1984. “The $62 Billion Question.”New Statesman March 23: 19–20.
13.
ChirotDanielHallThomas D.1982. “World-System Theory.”Annual Review of Sociology8: 81–106.
14.
DavisShelton H.1977. Victims of the Miracle. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
15.
DunlapRiley. 1991. “Public Opinion in the 1980s.”Environment33: 9–37.
16.
DunlapRileyGullupGeorgeGallupAlec M.1992. “The Health of the Planet.”The Polling Report8 (10): 1, 7–8.
17.
DunlapRileyGullupGeorgeJr.GallupAlec M.1992. “The Health of the Planet (Continued).”The Polling Report8 (11): 2–4.
18.
DunlapRileyScarceRik. 1991. “Environmental Problems and Protection.”Public Opinion Quarterly55: 651–672.
19.
EvansPeter. 1979. Dependent Development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
FearnsidePhilip. M.1989. “Extractive Reserves in Brazilian Amazonia.”Bioscience39: 387–393.
21.
FearnsidePhilip. M.1988. “Jari aos dezoito anos: Licoes para os planos silviculturais em Carajas.”A Amazonia Brasileira em Foco17: 81–101.
22.
FearnsidePhilip. M.1986. Human Carrying Capacity of the Brazilian Rainforest. New York: Columbia University Press.
23.
FurleyPeter A.1990. “The Nature and Sustainability of Brazilian Amazon Soils.” Pp. 309–358 in The Future of Amazonia, edited by GoodmanDavidHallAnthony. New York: St.Martin's Press.
24.
GoldembergJoseDurhamEunice Ribeiro. 1990. “Amazonia and National Sovereignty.”International Environmental Affairs2: 22–39.
25.
HallAnthony. 1987. “Agrarian Crisis in Brazilian Amazonia: The Grande Carajas Programme.”The Journal of Development Studies23: 522–552.
26.
HemmingJohn. 1987. Amazonian Frontier. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
HogeWarren. 1981. “Big Amazon Project Unfolds.”The New York Times, November 18.
28.
HoldenConstance. 1988. “The Greening of the World Bank.”Science240 (4859): 1610.
29.
HopperDavid W.1988. “The Seventh World Conservation Lecture The World Bank's Challenge: Balancing Economic Need with Environmental Protection.”The Environmentalist8: 165–175.
30.
HymanRandall. 1988. “Rise of the Rubber Tappers.”International Wildlife18: 24–28.
31.
IngramHelenMannDean E.1989. “Interest Groups and Environmental Policy.” Pp.135–157 in Environmental Politics and Policy, edited by LesterJames P.Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
32.
Inter-American Development Bank, United Nations Development Programme, and Amazon Cooperation Treaty. 1992. Amazonia Without Myths. (No place of publication nor publisher given.).
33.
IrwinHoward. 1977. “Coming to Terms with the Rain Forest.”Garden1: 29–33.
34.
KinkeadGwen. 1981. “Trouble in D.K.”Fortune April 20.
35.
KubitscheckJuscelino. 1975. Por que Construi Brasilia. Rio de Janeiro: Edicoes Bloch.
36.
LindenEugene. 1989. “Playing With Fire.”Time, September 18: 76–79.
37.
MaharDennis J.1990. “Policies Affecting Land Use in the Brazilian Amazon.”Land Use Policy7: 59–69.
38.
MaharDennis J.1989. Government Policies and Deforestation in Brazil's Amazon Region. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
39.
MarxKarl. 1906. Capital. New York: The Modern Library.
40.
MitchellRobert C.1990. “Public Opinion and the Green Lobby: Poised for the 1990s?” Pp.84–124, in Environmental Policy in the 1990s edited by VigNorman J.KraftMichael E.Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
41.
“O fim do romantismo.”Veja, April 28, 26 (17): 74–75.
42.
“Pouca luz na selva.”Veja, September 1, 26 (35): 28–29.
43.
ReisArthur Cesar Ferreira. 1982. A Amazonia e a Cobica Internacional. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Civilizacao Brasileira.
44.
Subcommittee on International Economic Policy and Trade of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, House of Representatives, U.S. Government. 1989. “Environmental Impact of World Bank Lending, Volumes I and II.” Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
45.
TreeceDavid. 1990. “Indigenous People in Brazilian Amazonia and the Expansion of the Economic Frontier.” Pp. 264–287 in The Future of Amazonia edited by GoodmanDavidAnthony Hall. New York: St. Martin's Press.
46.
TreeceDavid. 1987. Bound in Misery and Iron. London: Survival International.
47.
WallersteinImmanuel. 1987. Historical Capitalism. New York: Verso.
