This paper contributes to the continuing debate on how structures of economic power are connected to political processes in the United States by examining a widely respected theory concerning the financial support for the two dominant parties during the New Deal. Thomas Ferguson's “investment theory of politics” purports to demonstrate that capital-intensive, internationalist firms supported the Democrats while the labor-intensive, nationalist firms supported the Republicans. Campaign finance contributions for the 1936 Presidential election were used as an empirical indicator of the political preferences and material interests of business firms. It was found that there was little evidence to support Ferguson's claims. While there were firms where all political contributions went to the Republicans, it was highly unusual to have firms that contributed only to Democrats. There was also a total absence of Democratic industries. It is suggested that other variables need to be considered in determining the material bases of the major political parties, particularly the Democratic.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamanyDavid W.1972. Campaign Finance in America. North Scituate, MA: Duxbury Press.
2.
AlexanderHerbert. 1972. Money in Politics. Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press.
3.
AlexanderHerbert. 1976. Financing Politics: Money, Elections, and Political Reform. Third Edition. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
4.
AllenMichael Patrick. 1987. The Founding Fortunes. New York: Truman Talley Books.
5.
AllenMichael PatrickBroylesPhilip. 1989. “Class Hegemony and Political Finance: Presidential Campaign Contributions of Wealthy Capitalist Families”. American Sociological Review54: 275–287.
6.
BurrisVal. 1987. “The Political Partisanship of American Business”. American Sociological Review52: 732–744.
7.
CarossoVincent P.1970. Investment Banking in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
CashmanSean Dennis. 1989. America in the Twenties and Thirties. New York: New York University Press.
9.
ChandlerLester V.1970. America's Greatest Depression. New York: Harper and Row.
10.
Citizens' Research Foundation, University of Southern California. Records of Campaign Finance Contributions for 1936 compiled by Louise Overacker.
11.
ClawsonDanNeustadlAlan. 1988. “Corporate Political Groupings: Does Ideology Unify Business Political Behavior”. American Sociological Review53: 172–190.
12.
ClawsonDanNeustadlAlanBeardenJames. 1986. “The Logic of Business Unity: Corporate Contributions to the 1980 Congressional Elections”. American Sociological Review51: 797–811.
13.
DerberMiltonYoungEdwin. 1961. Labor and the New Deal. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
14.
DomhoffG. William. 1978. The Powers that Be: Processes of Ruling Class Domination in America. New York: Vintage Books.
15.
DomhoffG. William. 1983. Who Rules America Now?New York: Simon and Schuster.
16.
DomhoffG. William. 1987. “Corporate Liberal Theory and the Social Security Act”. Politics and Society15: 297–332.
17.
FergusonThomas. 1983. “Party Realignment and American Industrial Structure: The Investment Theory of Political Parties in Historical Perspective”. Pp. 1–82 in Research in Political Economy: A Research Annual, Volume 6, edited by ZarembkaPaul. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
18.
FergusonThomas. 1984. “From ‘Normalcy’ to New Deal: Industrial Structure, Party Competition, and American Public Policy in the Great Depression”. International Organization38: 41–92.
19.
FergusonThomas. 1989. “Industrial Conflict and the Coming of the New Deal: The Triumph of Multinational Liberalism in America”. Pp. 3–31 in The Rise and Fall of the New Deal Order, 1930–1980, edited by FraserSteveGertieGary. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
FergusonThomasRodgersJoel. 1986. Right Turn: The Decline of the Democrats and the Future of American Politics. New York: Hill and Wang.
21.
FriedanJeff. 1988. “Sectoral Conflict and U.S. Foreign Economic Policy, 1914–1940”. Pp. 52–72 in The State and Foreign Economic Policy, edited by IkenberryG. JohnLakeDavid A.MastandunoMichael. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
22.
HeardAlexander. 1962. The Costs of Democracy. New York: Anchor Books.
23.
HooksGregory. 1990. “From an Autonomous to a Captured State Agency: The Decline of the New Deal in Agriculture”. American Sociological Review55: 29–43.
24.
LeffMark. 1981. The Limits of Symbolic Reform: The New Deal and Taxation, 1933–1939. London: Cambridge University Press.
25.
LeuchtenburgWilliam E.1963. Franklin D. Roosevelt and the New Deal, 1932–1940. New York: Harper and Row.
26.
Lonergan Committee. 1937. See U.S. Congress. Senate. 1937.
27.
LundbergFerdinand. 1937. America's Sixty Families. New York: Vanguard Press.
28.
Moody's Manual of Investments. 1937. Banks, Insurance, Real Estate and Trusts. New York: Moody's Investment Service.
29.
Moody's Manual of Investments. 1937. Industrial Securities. New York: Moody's Investment Service.
30.
National Archives. Files of the Special Senate Committee to Investigate Campaign Expenditures of Presidential, Vice-Presidential, and Senatorial Candidates in 1936. Record Group 46. File 74A-F26.
31.
OverackerLouise. 1933. “Campaign Funds in a Depression Year”. American Political Science Review27: 769–783.
32.
OverackerLouise. 1937. “Campaign Funds in the Presidential Election of 1936”. American Political Science Review31: 473–498.
33.
OverackerLouise. 1941. “Campaign Finance in the Presidential Election of 1940.”American Political Science Review35: 701–727.
34.
OverackerLouise. 1946. Presidential Campaign Funds. Boston, MA: Boston University Press.
35.
PollockJames. 1926. Party Campaign Funds. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
36.
Poor's Register of Corporations, Directors, and Executives—United States and Canada. 1937. New York: Standard and Poor's Corporation.
37.
QuadagnoJill. 1984. “Welfare Capitalism and the Social Security Act of 1935”. American Sociological Review49: 632–647.
38.
RochesterAnna. 1936. Rulers of America: A Study of Finance Capital. New York: International Publishers.
39.
RomascoAlbert. 1983. The Politics of Recovery. New York: Oxford University Press.
40.
ShoupLawrenceMinterWilliam. 1977. Imperial Brain Trust. New York: Monthly Review.
41.
SkocpolTheda. 1980. “Political Response to Capitalist Crisis: Neo-Marxist Theories of the State and the Case of the New Deal”. Politics and Society10: 155–201.
42.
SkocpolThedaFinegoldKenneth. 1984. “State, Party, and Industry: From Business Recovery to the Wagner Act in the New Deal”. Pp. 159–192 in State Making and Social Movements: Essays in History and Theory edited by BrightCharlesHardingSusan. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
43.
ThayerGeorge. 1973. Who Shakes the Money Tree: Presidential Campaign Finance. New York: Simon & Schuster.
44.
U.S. Congress. Senate. 1937. Report of the Special Committee to Investigate Campaign Expenditures of Presidential, Vice-Presidential and Senatorial Candidates in 1936. 75th Congress, 1st Session, 1936, S. Rept. 151.
45.
UseemMichael. 1984. The Inner Circle. New York: Oxford University Press.
46.
WebberMichael J.1990. “The Material Bases of the Democratic Party: Class and Campaign Finance in the 1930s”. Ph.D dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.
47.
WolfskillGeorgeHudsonJohn A., 1969. All But the People: Franklin D. Roosevelt and His Critics, 1933–1939. London: Macmillan.
