In Search of the New Second Generation: Alternative Strategies for Identifying Second Generation Children and Understanding Their Acquisition of English
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online September, 1997
In Search of the New Second Generation: Alternative Strategies for Identifying Second Generation Children and Understanding Their Acquisition of English
Social scientists are devoting increasing attention to second-generation children for insights into the long-term consequences of immigration for American society. However, there is considerable disagreement over the operational criteria that should be used to determine membership in the second generation. Using the Public Use Microdata Sample of the 1990 U.S. Census, this study examines several issues. First, the implications of different operational criteria for descriptive analyses that focus on the size and composition of the second-generation child population are considered. We then assess whether different operational strategies have implications for multivariate analyses, especially those that focus on language skills. The results indicate that a key decision for most studies, except those that focus on socioeconomic composition, is how foreign-born children are classified. Foreign-born children should not be combined with native-born children on the grounds that they comprise the “de facto” second generation. Instead, researchers should make distinctions between the “decimal” generations to avoid obscuring diversity within the child population.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbercrombieNicholasHillStephenTurnerBryan. 1984. Dictionary of Sociology. New York: Penguin Books.
2.
AgrestiAlan1990. Categorical Data Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
3.
ArchdeaconThomas J.1983. Becoming American: An Ethnic History. New York: Free Press.
4.
BeanFrank D.TiendaMarta. 1987. The Hispanic Population of the United States. New York: Russell Sage.
5.
Board on Children, and Families. 1995. “Immigrant Children and their Families: Issues for Research and Policy.”The Future of Children5:72–89.
6.
BriggsVernon M.Jr.MooreStephen. 1994. Still and Open Door? U.S. Immigration Policy and the American Economy. Washington, DC: American University Press.
7.
BrimelowPeter. 1995. Alien Nation: Common Sense about America's Immigration Disaster. New York: Random House.
8.
CarpenterNiles. [1927]1969Immigrants and their Children 1920. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
9.
ChapaJorge. 1990. “The Myth of Hispanic Progess.”Journal of Hispanic Policy4:3–18.
10.
ChildIrvin L.1943. Italian or American? The Second Generation in Conflict. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
11.
EdmonstonBarryPasselJeffrey S.1994. “The Future Immigrant Population of the United States.” Pp. 317–353 in Immigration and Ethnicity: The Integration of America's Newest Arrivals, edited by EdmonstonBarryPasselJeffrey S.Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
12.
FixMichaelPasselJeffrey S.1994. Immigrants and Immigrants: Setting the Record Straight. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
13.
FugitaStephenO'BrienDavid J.1991. Japanese American Ethnicity: The Persistence of Community. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
14.
GansHerbert J.1992. “Second-Generation Decline: Scenarios for the Economic and Ethnic Futures of Post-1965 American Immigrants.”Ethnic and Racial Studies15:173–192.
15.
HanushekEric A.JacksonJohn E.1977. Statistical Methods for Social Scientists. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
16.
Hart-GonzalezLucindaFeingoldMarcia. 1990. “Retention of Spanish in the Home.”International Journal of the Sociology of Language84:5–34.
17.
Hayes-BautistaDavid E.SchinkWerner O.ChapaJorge. 1988. The Burden of Support: Young Latinos in an Aging Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
18.
IchihashiYamato. 1932. Japanese in the United States: A Critical Study of the Problems of the Japanese Immigrants and their Children. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
19.
JacobsJerry A.GreeneMargaret E.1994. “Race and Ethnicity, Social Class, and Schooling.” Pp. 209–256 in After Ellis Island: Newcomers and Natives in the 1910 Census, edited by WatkinsSusan Cotts. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
20.
JassoGuillerminaRosenzweigMark R.1990. The New Chosen People: Immigrants in the United States. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
21.
JensenLeifChitoseYoshimi. 1994. “Today's Second Generation: Evidence from the 1990 Census.”International Migration Review28:714–735.
22.
JohnsonColleen Leahy. 1985. Growing Up and Growing Old in Italian-American families. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
23.
KertzerDavid I.1983. “Generation as a Sociological Problem,” Pp. 125–149 in Annual Review of Sociology, edited by TurnerRalph H.ShortJames F.Jr.Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
24.
LandaleNancy S.TolnayStewart E.1993. “Generation, Ethnicity, and Marriage: Historical Patterns in the Northern United States.”Demography30:103–126.
25.
LiebersonStanleyWatersMary. 1988. From Many Strands: Ethnic and Racial Groups in Contemporary America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
26.
MannheimKarl. 1952. Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
27.
MartinPhilip. 1995. “Proposition 187 in California.”International Migration Review29:255–263.
28.
MasseyDouglas S.1995. “The New Immigration and Ethnicity in the United States.”Population and Development Review21:631–652.
29.
ModelSuzanne. 1988. “Italian and Jewish Intergenerational Mobility in 1910 in New York.”Social Science History12:31–48.
30.
MooreSandra Dash. 1981. At Home in America: Second Generation New York Jews. New York: Columbia University Press.
31.
PagniniDeanna L.MorganS. Philip. 1990. “Intermarriage and Social Distance among U.S. Immigrants at the Turn of the Century.”American Journal of Sociology96:405–432.
32.
PerezLisandro. 1994. “The Household Structure of Second Generation Children: An Exploratory Study of Extended Family Arrangements.”International Migration Review28:736–747.
33.
PetersenWilliamPetersenRenee. 1986. Dictionary of Demography: Terms, Concepts, and Institutions A-M. New York: Greenwood Press.
34.
PortesAlejandro. (Ed.) 1996. The New Second Generation. New York: Sage.
35.
PortesAlejandroZhouMin. 1992. “Gaining the Upper Hand: Economic Mobility Among Immigrant and Domestic Minorities.”Ethnic and Racial Studies15 (4):491–520.
36.
PortesAlejandroZhouMin. 1993. “The New Second Generation: Segmented Assimilation and Its Variants.”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science530:74–96.
37.
PortesAlejandroSchaufferRichard. 1994. “Language and the Second Generation: Bilingualism Yesterday and Today.”International Migration Review28:640–661.
38.
RumbautRubén G.1994. “The Crucible Within: Ethnic Identity, Self-Esteem, and Segmented Assimilation Among Children of Immigrants.”International Migration Review28:748–794.
39.
RumbautRubén G.1997. “Ties that Bind: Immigration and Immigrant Families in the United States.” Pp. 3–46 in International Migration and Family Change, edited by BoothAlanCrouterAnn C.LandaleNancy S.New York: Lawrence Earlbaum.
40.
SimonJulian L.1989. The Economic Consequences of Immigration. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
41.
StevensGillian. 1985. “Nativity, Intermarriage, and Mother-Tongue Shift.”American Sociological Review50:74–83.
42.
StevensGillian. 1992. “The Social and Demographic Context of Language Use in the United States.”American Sociological Review57:171–185.
43.
StevensGillianSchoenRobert. 1988. “Linguistic Intermarriage in the United States.”Journal of Marriage and the Family50:267–279.
44.
ThernstromStephan. 1964. Poverty and Progress: Social Mobility in a Nineteenth Century City. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45.
ThernstromStephan. 1973. The Other Bostonians: Poverty and Progress in the American Metropolis, 1880–1970. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1992. Census of Population and Housing, 1990: Public Use Microdata Samples U.S. Machine Readable Files. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.
47.
U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service. 1991. An Immigrant Nation: United States Regulation of Immigration, 1798–1991. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
48.
VeltmanCalvin. 1988. “Modeling the Language Shift Process of Hispanic Immigrants.”International Migration Review22:545–562.
49.
VeltmanCalvin. 1990. “The Status of Spanish Language in the United States at the Beginning of the 21st Century.”International Migration Review24:108–123.
50.
WardDavid. 1971. Cities and Immigrants: A Geography of Change in Nineteenth Century America. New York: Oxford University Press.
51.
WatersMary. 1990. Ethnic Options: Choosing Identities in America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
52.
WatkinsSusan Cotts. 1994. “Background.” Pp. 11–33 in After Ellis Island: Newcomers and Natives in the 1910 Census, edited by WatkinsSusan Cotts. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
53.
WhiteMichael J.DymowskiRobert F.WangShilian. 1994. “Ethnic Neighbors and Ethnic Myths: An Examination of Residential Segregation in 1910.” Pp. 175–208 in After Ellis Island: Newcomers and Natives in the 1910 Census, edited by WatkinsSusan Cotts. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
54.
ZhouMinBankstonCarl L.III.1994. “Social Capital and the Adaptation of the Second Generation: The Case of Vietnamese Youth in New Orleans.”International Migration Review28:821–845.
