Postmodern theory is examined from the perspective of explanatory scientific theory. Although this kind of effort would be rejected by postmodernists as imposing a failed epistemology, this article nonetheless translates the arguments of prominent postmodern theorists into a series of propositions. By developing these propositions, it is possible to see how they might generate testable hypotheses that can guide the empirical assessment of the substantive arguments of sociological postmodernists. The propositions are organized under four basic headings: (1) the increasing importance of culture; (2) the destabilization and dereification of culture; (3) the increasing importance of the individual; and (4) the viability of the subject. While there is inevitably a certain amount of selectivity involved in this exercise, our hope is that the core arguments of postmodern theory are arrayed in a manner that can facilitate their empirical assessment by researchers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllanKenneth1998. The Meaning of Culture: Moving the Postmodern Critique Forward. Westport, CT: Praeger.
2.
AndersonPerry1998. The Origins of Postmodernity. London: Verso.
3.
BaudrillardJean [1972] 1981. For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign. Translated by LevenC.St. Louis: Telos Press.
4.
BaudrillardJean [1973] 1975. The Mirror of Production. Translated by PosterM.St. Louis: Telos Press.
5.
BaudrillardJean [1976] 1993. Symbolic Exchange and Death. Translated by HamiltonI.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6.
BaudrillardJean [1981] 1994. Simulacra and Simulation. Translated by BlaserS. FariaAnn Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
7.
BaudrillardJean1983. Simulations. Translated by FossP.PattonP.BeitchmanP.New York: Semiotext(e).
8.
BaudrillardJean1989. “The Anorexic Ruins.” Pp. 29–45 in Looking Back on the End of the World, edited by WulfC.New York: Semiotext(e).
9.
BaumanZygmunt1992. Intimations of Postmodernity. London: Routledge.
10.
BellDaniel1973. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. New York: BasicBooks.
11.
BellDaniel1976. The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism. New York: BasicBooks.
12.
BertensHans1995. The Idea of the Postmodern: A History. London: Routledge.
13.
BrownRichard Harvey1987. Society as Text: Essays on Rhetoric, Reason, and Reality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14.
BrownRichard Harvey1990. “Rhetoric, Textuality, and the Postmodern Turn in Sociological Theory.”Sociological Theory8:188–97.
15.
BrownRichard Harvey1993. “Cultural Representation and Ideological Domination.”Social Forces71:657–76.
16.
CahooneLawrence ed. 1996. From Modernism to Postmodernism: An Anthology. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
17.
DenzinNorman K.1986. “Postmodern Social Theory.”Sociological Theory4:194–204.
18.
DenzinNorman K.1991. Images of Postmodern Society: Social Theory and Contemporary Cinema. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19.
DunnRobert G.1998. Identity Crises: A Social Critique of Postmodernity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
20.
DurkheimÉmile [1893] 1984. The Division of Labor in Society. Translated by HallsW.D.New York: Free Press.
21.
GergenKenneth J.1991. The Saturated SelfNew York: BasicBooks.
22.
GottdienerMark1990. “The Logocentrism of the Classics.”American Sociological Review55:460–63.
23.
GottdienerMark1993. “Ideology, Foundationalism, and Sociological Theory.”Sociological Quarterly34:653–71.
24.
HarveyDavid1989. The Conditions of Postmodernity: An Inquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Oxford: Blackwell.
25.
JamesonFredric1984. “Postmodernism, or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism.”New Left Review146:52–92.
26.
JamesonFredric1991. Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
27.
JamesonFredric1998. The Cultural Turn: Selected Writings on the Postmodern, 1983–1998. London: Verso.
28.
JencksCharles1977. The Language of Post-Modern Architecture. New York: Rizzoli.
29.
LashScott1988. “Discourse or Figure? Postmodernism as a ‘Regime of Signification’.”Theory, Culture and Society5:11–36.
30.
LashScottUrryJohn1987. The End of Organized Capitalism. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
31.
LashScottUrryJohn1994. Economies of Signs and Space. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32.
LemertCharles1990. “The Uses of French Structuralisms in Sociology.” Pp. 230–54 in Frontiers of Social Theory: The New Syntheses, edited by RitzerG.New York: Columbia University Press.
33.
LemertCharles1992. “General Social Theory, Irony, Postmodernism.” Pp. 17–46 in Postmodernism and Social Theory: The Debate over General Theory, edited by SeidmanS.WagnerD.G.Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
34.
LemertCharles1994. “Social Theory at the End of a Short Century.”Sociological Theory12:140–52.
35.
LemertCharles1995. Sociology after the Crisis. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
36.
LukácsGeorg [1922] 1971. History and Class Consciousness. London: Merlin Press.
37.
LyotardJean-François [1979] 1984. The Postmodern Condition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
38.
MarxKarl [1867] 1977. Capital, Vol. 1: A Critique of Political Economy. New York: International Publishers.
39.
MarxKarlEngelsFriedrich [1848] 1961. “The Communist Manifesto.” Pp. 13–44 in Essential Works of Marxism, edited by MendelA.P.New York: Bantam Books.
40.
RitzerGeorge1997. Postmodern Social Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
41.
RortyRichard1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
42.
RortyRichard1994. “Method, Social Science, and Social Hope.” Pp. 46–64 in The Postmodern Turn: New Perspectives on Social Theory, edited by SeidmanS.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
SeidmanSteven1992. “Postmodern Social Theory as Narrative with a Moral Intent.” Pp. 47–81 in Postmodernism and Social Theory, edited by SeidmanS.WagnerD.G.Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
44.
SeidmanSteven1994. “The End of Sociological Theory.” Pp. 119–39 in The Postmodern Turn: New Perspectives on Social Theory, edited by SeidmanS.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45.
SimmelGeorg [1903] 1971. “The Metropolis and Mental Life.” Pp. 324–39 in Georg Simmel: On Individuality and Social Forms, edited by LevineD.N.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
46.
SimmelGeorg [1907] 1990. The Philosophy of Money. Edited by FrisbyD. translated by BottomoreT.FrisbyD., London: Routledge.
47.
SimmelGeorg [1908] 1971. “Group Expansion and the Development of Individuality.” Pp. 251–93 in Georg Simmel: On Individuality and Social Forms, edited by LevineD.N.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48.
SimmelGeorg [1922] 1955. The Web of Group-Affiliations. Translated by BendixR.New York: Free Press.
49.
SontagSusan1990. Against Interpretation, and Other Essays. New York: Anchor.
50.
SpencerHerbert1898. Principles of Sociology. New York: Appleton.
51.
TouraineAlain1971. The Post-Industrial Society, Tomorrow's Social History: Classes, Conflicts and Culture in the Programmed Society, Translated by MayhewL. F. X.New York: Random House.
52.
WeberMax1968. Economy and Society. Edited and Translated by RothG.WittichC.Berkeley: University of California Press.
