This article explores the increasing involvement of the state in science, in particular the establishment of a new cabinet-level ministry for science and technology by 146 countries from 1950 to 1990. As confirmatory analyses to test hypotheses, I employ event history techniques—piecewise exponential models with period-specific effects. The results show that although internal, functional conditions exerted a positive influence on the adoption rate of science ministries during the earlier period (1950–70), institutional effects have become more influential over time (1971–90). The increasing institutional effects were supported by three findings. First, the baseline founding rate of science ministries during the later period is significantly higher than that of the earlier period, which indicates that the ministry of science and technology became an expected and legitimated governmental structure since the late 1960s. Second, the amount of global organizational discourse on science and national development has a positive and significant effect on the founding of science ministries throughout the world in the later period. Third, direct linkage to international science organizations and discourse, as measured by the number of memberships of each country in the International Council of Science Unions (ICSU), strongly affects the founding of science ministries during both periods and even more strongly during the latter one.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AikinCharlesKoenigLouis W.1949. “Introduction to Hoover Commission: A Symposium.”American Political Science Review43:933–40.
2.
AugerPierre. 1961. Current Trends in Scientific Research. Paris: UNESCO.
3.
BanksArthur. 1950–92. Political Handbook of the World. New York: CSA Publications.
4.
Chase-DunnChristopher. 1989. Global Formation: Structures of the World Economy. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.
5.
ColeRobert. 1989. Strategies for Learning: Small-Group Activities in American, Japanese, and Swedish Industry. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
CollinsRandall. 1986. Weberian Sociological Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
DiMaggioPaulPowellWalter. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.”American Sociological Review48:147–60.
8.
EllulJacques. 1964. The Technological Society. New York: Knopf.
9.
FinnemoreMartha. 1991. “Science, the State, and International Society.” Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.
10.
FinnemoreMartha. 1993. “International Organization as Teachers of Norms: The United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization and Science Policy.”International Organization47 (4)567–97.
11.
GalbraithJohn K.1973. Economics and the Public Purpose. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
12.
HarrisJoseph P.1946. “Wartime Currents and Peacetime Trends.”American Political Science Review40:1137–54.
13.
JacksonRobert H.RosbergCarl G.1982. “Why Africa's Weak States Persist: Empirical and Juridical Statehood.”World Politics35:1–24.
14.
JonesEric L.1981. The European Miracles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
KerrClarkDunloopJ. T.HarbisonF.MyersC. A.1960. Industrialism and Industrial Man. New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
KimYoung Soo. 1996. “The Expansion of Ministries in Modern Nation-States.” Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.
17.
KrippendorffEkkehart. 1975. “Towards a Class Analysis of the International System”Acto Politica10:3–13.
18.
MeadHerbert. 1934. Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
MeyerJohn. 1983. “Institutionalization and the Rationality of Formal Organizational Structure.” Pp. 261–82 in Organizational Environments, edited by MeyerJ.ScottR.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20.
MeyerJohn. 1987. “World Polity and the Authority of the Nation-State.” Pp. 41–70 in Institutional Structure: Constituting State, Society, and the Individual, edited by ThomasG.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21.
MeyerJohn. 1994. “Rationalized Environments” Pp. 28–54 in Institutional Environments and Organizations: Structural Complexity and Individualism, edited by ScottW.R.MeyerJ.W.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
MeyerJohn. 1999. “The Changing Cultural Content of the Nation-State: A World Society Perspective.” Pp. 123–43 in State and Culture: New Approaches to the State after the Cultural Turn, edited by SteinmetzG.Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
23.
MeyerJohnBoliJohnThomasGeorge M.RamirezFrancisco. 1997. “World Society and the Nation State”American Journal of Sociology103 (1):144–81.
24.
MeyerJohnRowanBrian. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.”American Journal of Sociology83:340–63.
25.
MeyerJohnScottW. RichardStrangDavidCreightonAndrew. 1988. “Bureaucratization without Centralization: Changes in the Organizational System of U.S. Public Education, 1940–80.” Pp. 139–68 in Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment, edited by ZuckerL.G.Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
26.
OECD. 1963. Science and the Policies of Governments. Paris: OECD.
27.
OECD. 1993. OECD Economic Outlook53. Paris: OECD.
28.
OlzakSusan. 1989. “Analysis of Events in the Study of Collective Action.”Annual Review of Sociology15:119–41.
29.
PembertonWilliam E.1979. Bureaucratic Politics: Executive Reorganization during the Truman Administration. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
30.
PoggiGianfrano. 1978. The Development of the Modern State: A Sociological Introduction. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
31.
RamirezFrancisco O.SoysalYaseminShanahanSuzanne E.1997. “The Changing Logic Political Citizenship: Cross-National Acquisition of Women's Suffrage Rights, 1890–1990.”American Sociological Review62:735–45.
32.
RohwerGotz. 1994. “TDA Working Papers.” Unpublished.
33.
RosenauJames. 1970. The Adaptation of National Societies: A Theory of Political System Behavior and Transformation. New York: McCaleb-Seiler.
34.
ScottW. Richard. 1995. Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
SpaeyJacques. 1971. Science for Development: An Essay on the Origin and Organization of National Science Policies. Paris: UNESCO.
36.
StarrPaulImmergutEllen. 1987. “Health Care and the Boundaries of the Political.” Pp. 221–54 in Changing Boundaries of the Political edited by MaierC.Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
StrangDavid. 1991. “Adding Social Structure to Diffusion Models: An Event History Framework.”Sociological Methodology and Research19:324–52.
39.
StrangDavidMeyerJohn. 1993. “Institutional Conditions for Diffusion.”Theory and Society22:487–511.
40.
TaylorCharles L.AmmJoachim. 1992. National Capability Data: Annual Series, 1950–1988. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
41.
ThomasGeorgeBoliJohnKimYoung S.1993. “World Culture and International Non-Governmental Organization.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Miami, FL.
42.
ThomasGeorgeMeyerJohnRamirezFranciscoBoliJohn. 1987. Institutional Structure: Constituting State, Society, and the Individual. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
43.
TillyCharles. 1985. “War Making and State Making as Organized Crime.” Pp. 169–91 in Bringing the State Back In, edited by EvansP.Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
44.
TolbertPamelaZuckerLynne. 1983. “Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880–1935.”Administrative Science Quarterly28:22–39.
45.
TumaNancyHannanMichael. 1984. Social Dynamics: Models and Methods. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
46.
Union of International Associations (UIA). 1950–92. Yearbook of International Organizations. Munich: K. G. Saur.
47.
WallersteinImmanuel. 1974. The Modern World System. Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press.
48.
World Bank. 1950–88. World Tables of Economic and Social Indicators, 1950–1988. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
49.
WuthnowRobert. 1987. Meaning and Moral Order. Berkeley: University of California Press.
50.
YamaguchiKazuo. 1991. Event History Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
