An urban sample of referred and nonreferred Black, Hispanic, and Anglo pupils were assessed with the WISC-R and K-ABC cognitive and achievement scales. Approximately 38% of the Hispanic sample was identified as Limited-English Proficient (LEP). Analysis of various procedures revealed differences in cognitive and achievement performance due to pupils' ethnicity, referral status, and LEP status. Predictive bias was examined using Potthoff's (1966) simultaneous test of regression slopes and intercepts. For both WISC-R and K-ABC IQ measures, a number of regressions on the K-ABC Total and Arithmetic achievement measures evidenced bias across ethnic groups for both referred and nonreferred samples. Bias due to language dominance also was found for WISC-R and K-ABC composite scales. Implications of predictive bias for assessment and placement of minority and LEP children in special education classes are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AngoffW. H.FordS. F. (1973). Item-race interaction on a test of scholastic aptitude. Journal of Educational Measurement, 10, 95–105.
2.
BrownA. L.FrenchL. A. (1979). The zone of potential development: Implications for intelligence testing in the year 2000. Intelligence, 3, 217–233.
3.
ClearyT. A.HumphreysL. G.KendrickS. A.WesmanA. (1975). Educational uses of tests with disadvantaged students. American Psychologist, 30, 15–41.
4.
CumminsJ. (1984). Bilingualism and special education: Issues in assessment and pedagogy. San Diego, CA: College-Hill.
5.
De AvilaE.DuncanS. (1981). Language Assessment Scales. San Rafael, CA: Linguametrics Group.
6.
GlaserR. (1981). The future of testing: A research agenda for cognitive psychology and psychometrics. American Psychologist, 36, 923–936.
7.
GluttingJ. J. (1986). Potthoff bias analysis of K-ABC MPC and nonverbal scale IQs among Anglo, Black, and Puerto Rican kindergarten children. Professional School Psychology, 4, 225–234.
8.
HaberL. Y. N. (1985). Review of language assessment scales. In MitchellJ. V.Jr. (Ed.), The 9th mental measurements yearbook (Vol. 1). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
9.
HernandezA. E. (1987 August), A comparison of the zone of proximal development in Anglo and Hispanic learning disabled elementary pupilsUnpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University.
10.
HollandP. W.ThayerD. T. (1986). Differential item performance and the Mantel-Haenszel procedurePaper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 272577).
11.
JensenA. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: The Free Press.
12.
JohnsonP. O.NeymanJ. (1936). Tests of certain linear hypotheses and their application to some educational problems. Statistical Research Memoirs, 1, 57–93.
13.
JonesR. L. (1988). Psychoeducational assessment of minority group children: Issues and perspectives. In JonesR. L. (Ed.), Psychoeducational assessment of minority group children: A casebook (pp. 13–35). Berkeley, CA: Cobb and Henry.
14.
KamphausR. W.ReynoldsD. R. (1987). Clinical and research applications of the K-ABC. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
15.
KaufmanA. S.KaufmanN. L. (1983). Administration and scoring manual for Kaufman assessment battery for children. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
16.
KeoghB. K. (1988). Improving services for problem learners: Rethinking and restructuring. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21 (1), 19–22.
17.
NaglieriJ. A.HillD. S. (1986). Comparison of WISC-R and K-ABC regression lines for academic prediction with Black and White children. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 15 (4), 352–355.
18.
PotthoffR. F. (1966). Statistical aspects of the problem of biases in psychological tests. Chapel Hill, NC: Institute of Statistics Mimeo Series No. 479.
19.
ReynoldsC. R. (1982). Construct and predictive bias. In BerkR. A. (Ed.), Handbook of methods for detecting test bias. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
20.
ReynoldsC. R. (1984). Critical measurement issues in learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 18 (4), 451–487.
21.
ReynoldsC. R.BrownR. T. (1984). Perspectives on bias in mental testing. New York: Plenum.
22.
ReynoldsC. R.GutkinT. B. (1980). A regression analysis of test bias on the WISC-R for Anglos and Chicanos referred for psychological services. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 8 (2), 237–243.
23.
ReynoldsC. R.HartlageL. (1979). Comparison of WISC and WISC-R regression lines for academic prediction with Black and with White referred children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47 (3), 589–591.
24.
SchuennemanJ. (1979). A method of assessing bias in test items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 16, 143–152.
25.
SvanumS.BringleR. G. (1982). Race, social class, and predictive bias: An evaluation using the WISC, WRAT, and teacher ratings. Intelligence, 6, 275–286.
26.
ValdezR. S.ValdezC. (1983). Detecting predictive bias: The WISC-R vs. achievement scores of Mexican-American and non-minority students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 440–446.
27.
WechslerD. (1974). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.
28.
WillsonV. L. (1987 August), Cognitive psychology and test development—Out with the oldPaper presented at the American Psychological Association, New York.
29.
YsseldykeJ. E.ThurlowM. L. (1984). Assessment practices in special education: Adequacy and appropriateness. Educational Psychologist, 9 (3), 123–136.
