This article contains suggestions for assessing and instructing culturally and linguistically different students. Special emphasis is placed on ways to distinguish those who are truly learning disabled from students who differ from the mainstream U.S. populations due to their unique cultural and linguistic background. The article focuses on how to reduce and circumvent the bias found in most widely used educational tests by paying increased attention to students' strengths and previously gained knowledge.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmbertA.The identification of LEP children with special needs. Bilingual Journal, 1982, 6(1), 17–22.
BernalE.M.Adapting assessment procedures to specific population characteristics: The Chicano child. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, August 1977. ED 145 943, 1983.
BrawerC.FraddS.A preliminary analysis of data on limited English proficient students in Florida schools. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Department of Education, 1983.
6.
BrownG.RosenN.HillS.OlivasM.The condition of education for Hispanic-Americans. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Educational Statistics, United States Department of Education, 1980.
7.
BurtM.DulayH.Some guidelines for the assessment of oral language proficiency and dominance. TESOL Quarterly, 1978, 12(2), 177–192.
8.
CohenR.Conceptual styles, culture conflict, and nonverbal tests of intelligence. American Anthropologist, 1969, 71(5), 828–856.
9.
CohenR.FrankelG.BrewerJ.The language of the hard-core poor: Implications for culture conflict. Sociological Quarterly, 1968, 10, 19–28.
10.
CumminsJ.The entry and exit fallacy of bilingual education. NABE Journal, 1980, 6(3), 25–29. (a)
11.
CumminsJ.Psychological assessment of immigrant children: Logic or intuition?Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1980, 1(2), 97–111. (b)
12.
CurtisC.Identification of cognitive style in the bilingual school. In Outstanding dissertations of 1983. Rosslyn, VA: National Center for Bilingual Education, in press.
13.
FraddS.Language assessment in two languages. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Bilingual Education Service Center, 1983.
14.
FraseL.Boundary conditions for mathemagenic behaviors. Review of Educational Research, 1970, 40(3), 337–347.
15.
GelattJ.AndersonM.Bilingual language learning system. Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 1983.
16.
GladwinT.East is a big bird. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1970.
17.
GonzalezE.Draw-a-person Koppitz scoring southwest norms. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico, 1980.
18.
HallmanC.L.CampbellA.Cuban orientations cultural monograph, 1983, 1. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, Bilingual Multicultural Education Training Project, Grant No. G001812500.
19.
HallmanC.L.EtienneM.R.FraddS.Haitian value orientations cultural monograph, 1983, 2. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, Bilingual Multicultural Education Training Project, Grant No. G001812500.
20.
HammillD.D.LeighJ.E.McNuttG.LarsenS.C.A new definition of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 1981, 4(4), 336–441.
21.
HastingsL.Cultural considerations in the assessment of bilingual handicapped children. Paper presented at the Council for Exceptional Children Conference, New Orleans, 1981.
22.
HellerK.A.HoltzmanW.H.MessickS. (Eds.). Placing children in special education: A strategy for equity. Washington, DC: National Academic Press, 1982.
23.
KoranJ.KoranM.The effects of teacher anxiety and modeling on the acquisition of a science teaching skill and concomitant student performance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1981, 18(4).
24.
LeibowitzA.Federal recognition of the right of minority language groups. Rosslyn, VA: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education, 1982.
25.
MercerJ.Identifying the gifted Chicano child. First Symposium on Chicano Psychology, University of California, Irvine, May 1976.
26.
OllerJ.Communicative competence: Can it be tested? In ScarceliaR.KrashenS. (Eds.), Research in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 1980.
27.
OllerJ.Language tests at school. London: Longman, 1979.
28.
OllerJ.Testing proficiencies and diagnosing language disorders in bilingual children. In OmarkD. R.EricksonJ. G. (Eds.), The bilingual exceptional child. San Diego, CA: College Hill Press, 1983.
29.
OmarkD. R.EricksonJ. G. (Eds.). The bilingual exceptional child. San Diego, CA: College Hill Press, 1983.
30.
OrtizA. A.YatesJ. R.Exceptional Hispanics: Implications for special education services and manpower planning. Austin, TX: Council for Personnel Preparation for the Handicapped, Texas Education Agency, 1981.
31.
PedrazaP.PousadaA.Bilingualism in and out of school: Ethnographic perspective on the determination of language “dominance.”New York: Language Policy Task Force, Centro de Estudios Puertoriqueñas, CUNY, 1980.
32.
RamirezM.HeraldP.CastañedaA.The relationship of acculturation to cognitive style among Mexican-Americans. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1974, 5(4), 324–334.
33.
Refugee Reports, 1982, 3(25).
34.
RiveraC.SimichC.Issues in the assessment of language proficiency of language minority students. NABE Journal, 1981, 6(1), 19–39.
35.
RothkopfE.The concept of mathemagenic activities. Review of Educational Research, 1970, 40(3), 325–336.
36.
SnowC.Hoefnagel-HohleM.Age differences in second language acquisition. In HatchE.M. (Ed.), Second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 1978.
37.
State of Florida. A resource manual for the development and evaluation of special programs for exceptional students, evaluating the non-English-speaking handicapped (Vol. IIIB). Tallahassee, FL: Author, 1982.
38.
SternbergR.Factor theories of intelligence are all right almost. Educational Researcher, September 1980, 6–13.
39.
SternbergR.Stalking the IQ quark. Psychology Today, 1979, 13(4), 42–56.
40.
TorranceE.Ways of discovering gifted black children. In BaldwinA.Y.LucitoL.J. (Eds.), Educational planning for the gifted: Overcoming cultural, geographic, and socioeconomic barriers. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children, 1978.
41.
WitkinH.MooreC.GoodenoughD.CoxP.Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 1977, 47(1), 1–64.
