Students with exceptional learning needs should not be denied access to special education programs because of their language or race. However, such factors should not be ignored either. This paper examines the issue of disproportionate representation of limited-English proficient Hispanic students in classes for the learning disabled. On-site reviews of school districts suggest inadequate assessment, evaluation, placement, and re-evaluation of limited-English proficient Hispanic students. Sixteen policy considerations are provided in an effort to help school districts to ensure that limited-English proficient learning disabled students receive equal access to appropriate learning opportunities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
California State Department of Education, Office of Special Education. A status report Diana et al. v. State Board of Education et al. Unpublished report, Sacramento, May 1983.
2.
HEW Memorandum on “Policy Statement Specifying Affirmative Action for Language Minority Students.”Washington, D.C.: Department of Health, Education and Welfare, May 25, 1970.
3.
United States Congress. Public Law 93–112 (Rehabilitation Act of 1973), Section 504, U.S.C. 794 (1973). Section 504 Regulations, Federal Register, 42 (163), August 23, 1977.
4.
United States Congress. Public Law 94–142 (The Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975), 20 U.S.C. 1401. P.L. 94–142 Regulations, Federal Register, 42 (86), May 4, 1977.
5.
Arreola v. Santa Ana Board of Education, 160–577 (Orange County, California, 1968).
6.
Covarruvias v. San DiegoUnified School District, No. 70–394-T (San Diego, California, February 1971).
7.
Diana v. California State Board of Education, No. C-70–37 RFP (District Court of Northern California, February 1970).
8.
Larry P. v. Wilson Riles, 343 F. Supp. 1306, 502F, 2nd 963 (9th Cir., 1974).
9.
California State Department of Education, 1981 CBEDS Data on California Public School Enrollment by Ethnicity.
10.
California State Department of Education, Office of Special Education, “Ethnicity Summary by Handicapped Condition,” December 1, 1981.
11.
Dyrcia S. v. Board of Education, 79 Civ. 270 (1979).
12.
United States Congress. P.L. 95–561 (The Bilingual Education Act), 20 U.S.C., 3221–3261.
13.
ArterJ.JenkinsJ.Differential diagnosis—prescriptive teaching: A critical appraisal. Review of Educational Research, 1979, 49, 517–555.
14.
AsherJ.J.The total physical response: Theory and practice. In WinitzW. (Ed.), Native language and foreign language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1981, 379.)
15.
BacaL.Issues in the education of culturally diverse exceptional children. Exceptional Children, 1980, 46, 583.
16.
BacaL.BransfordJ.An appropriate education for handicapped children of limited English proficiency. An ERIC exceptional child education reportReston, VA: ERIC Clearinghouse on Handicapped and Gifted Children, 1982.
17.
BerginV.Special education needs in bilingual programs. Rosalyn, VA: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education, 1980.
18.
BruckM.The suitability of early French immersion programs for the language disabled child. Canadian Modern Language Review, 1978, 34, 884–887.
19.
BurkeH.An update on the proposed bilingual competencies for special education assessment personnel. In OchoaA.M.HurtadoJ. (Eds.), Special education and the bilingual child. San Diego, CA: SDSU Institute for Cultural Pluralism, 1982.)
20.
CoxE.VasquezM.An overview of the requirements of special education. In OchoaA.M.HurtadoJ. (Eds.), Special education and the bilingual child. San Diego, CA: SDSU Institute for Cultural Pluralism, 1982.)
21.
CumminsJ.The entry and exit fallacy in bilingual education. NABE Journal, 1981, 4 (3), 25–60. (a)
22.
CumminsJ.The role of primary language development in promoting educational success for language minority students. In California State Department of Education, Bilingual Education Office, School and language minority students: A theoretical framework. Los Angeles, CA: Evaluation, Dissemination, and Assessment Center, California State University, Los Angeles, 1981. (b)
23.
DelgadoT.A parent's point of view in working with special education children. In OchoaA.M.HurtadoJ. (Eds.), Special education and the bilingual child. San Diego, CA: SDSU Institute for Cultural Pluralism, 1982.)
24.
EricksonJ.G.WalkerC.L.Bilingual exceptional children: What are the issues? In OmarkD.R.EricksonJ.G. (Eds.), The bilingual exceptional child. San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press, 1983.)
25.
FeuersteinM.R.RandY.JensenM.Can evolving techniques better measure cognitive change?Journal of Special Education, 1981, 15, 269–287.
26.
KiraitheJ.M.Second language acquisition: Implications for assessment and placement. In OchoaA.M.HurtadoJ. (Eds.), Special education and the bilingual child. San Diego, CA: SDSU Institute for Cultural Pluralism, 1982.)
27.
KrashenS.Aptitude and attitude in relation to second language acquisition and learning. In DillerK.C. (Ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude. Rowley, MA: Newberry House, 1981.)
28.
LangdonH.Determining a language disorder in a bilingual Spanish-English population. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston University, 1977.
29.
LangdonH.ParkerD.Developing individual education plans for language minority students. In OchoaA.M.HurtadoJ. (Eds.), Special education and the bilingual child. San Diego, CA: SDSU Institute for Cultural Pluralism, 1982.)
30.
LochtefeldD.H.A handbook for parents of special education students. San Diego, CA: San Diego City Schools, 1981.
31.
MartinezO.Developing a plan for coordinating bilingual and special education services—San Jose Unified School District plan. In OchoaA.M.HurtadoJ. (Eds.), Special education and the bilingual child. San Diego, CA: SDSU Institute for Cultural Pluralism, 1982.)
32.
MattesL.J.OmarkD.R.Speech and language assessment for the bilingual handicapped. San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press, 1984.
33.
MedinaV.Y.Bilingual aide training: Trainer's manual for communication aides. Downey, CA: Office of the Los Angeles Superintendent of Schools, 1980.
34.
MedinaV.Y.Issues regarding the use of interpreters and translators in a school setting. In OchoaA.M.HurtadoJ. (Eds.), Special education and the bilingual child. San Diego, CA: SDSU Institute for Cultural Pluralism, 1982.)
35.
MercerJ.System of multicultural pluralistic assessment. New York: The Psychological Corp., 1979.
36.
OmarkD.R.WatsonD.L.Assessing bilingual exceptional children: In-service manual. San Diego, CA: Los Amigos Research Associates, 1983. (a)
37.
OmarkD.R.WatsonD.L.Psychological testing and bilingual education: The need for reconceptualization. In OmarkD.R.EricksonJ.G. (Eds.), The bilingual exceptional child. San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press, 1983. (b))
38.
OchoaA.M.HurtadoJ. (Eds.). Special education and the bilingual child. San Diego, CA: SDSU Institute for Cultural Pluralism, 1982.)
39.
OchoaA.M.RomoH.Lau Center manual IV: Recommendations and framework for developing a comprehensive master plan to comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. San Diego, CA: SDSU Institute for Cultural Pluralism, Spring, 1977.
40.
OrtizS.JonesA.Using bilingual instructional materials for language minority students in special education. In OchoaA.M.HurtadoJ. (Eds.), Special education and the bilingual child. San Diego, CA: SDSU Institute for Cultural Pluralism, 1982.)
41.
PachecoR.Bilingual mentally retarded children: Language confusion or real deficits? In OmarkD.R.EricksonJ.G. (Eds.), The bilingual exceptional child. San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press, 1983.)
42.
PachecoR.CegelkaP.One approach in teaching the special education child. In OchoaA.M.HurtadoJ. (Eds.), Special education and the bilingual child. San Diego, CA: SDSU Institute for Cultural Pluralism, 1982.)
43.
PachecoR.OmarkD.R.Special education and bilingual education: Working together. San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press, 1984.
44.
RosierP.HolmW.The Rock Point experience: A longitudinal study of a Navajo school. Bilingual education series, No. 8. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics, 1980.
45.
SanchezR.Language proficiency assessment. San Diego, CA: SDSU) Institute for Cultural Pluralism, 1979.
46.
StapletonL.VargasM.V.ABC unified school district's approach for services in bilingual special education. In OchoaA.M.HurtadoJ. (Eds.), Special education and the bilingual child. San Diego, CA: Institute for Cultural Pluralism, 1982.)
47.
TempesF.A theoretical framework for bilingual instruction: How does it apply to students in special education. In OchoaA.M.HurtadoJ. (Eds.), Special education and the bilingual child. San Diego, CA: SDSU Institute for Cultural Pluralism, 1982.)
48.
ThonisE.Beyond the language needs of culturally different children. Paper presented at the National Special Education Conference, New Orleans, LA, February 18, 1981.
49.
TwomeyS.C.GallegosC.AndersonL.WilliamsonB.WilliamsonJ.A study of the effectiveness of various nondiscriminatory and assessment criteria for placement of minority students in special education programs. Merced, CA: Planning Associates, 1980.
50.
WatsonD.L.OmarkD.R.GrovellS.HellerB.Nondiscriminatory assessment: Practitioner's guide. San Diego, CA: Los Amigos Research Associates, 1982.
