This paper reviews accumulated research pertinent to the issue of modality preference as a method for differentiating beginning reading instruction. Research is considered here in the following categories: Studies providing differential instruction based on modality preference; related studies comparing auditory and visual modes as mediational channels; and studies dealing with the extent to which auditory and visual capacities are related to success in beginning reading. The following conclusions are presented: 1) Regardless of the measure used to classify learners, only a relatively small percentage of children showed a marked preference for either modality; 2) most current measurement instruments did not demonstrate the necessary reliability to be used in decisions concerning differential assignment of children to instructional programs; and 3) differentiating instruction according to modality preference apparently did not facilitate learning to read.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArciszewskiR.A.The effects of visual perception training on the perceptual ability and reading achievement of first grade students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University, 1968.
2.
ArterJ.A.JenkinsJ.R.Examining the benefits and prevalence of modality considerations in special education. Journal of Special Education, 1977, 11, 281–298.
3.
BarrettT.C.The relationship between measures of pre-reading visual discrimination and first grade reading achievement: a review of the literature. Reading Research Quarterly, 1965, 1, 51–76.
4.
BatemanB.The efficacy of an auditory and a visual method of first grade reading instruction with auditory and visual learners. In SmithH.K. (Ed.), Perception and reading, V. 12 (4). Newark, DE: International Reading Association, 1968.
5.
BennettR.M.A study of the effects of a visual perception program upon school achievement, IQ and visual perception. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee, 1968.
6.
BruininksR.H.Teaching word recognition to disadvantaged boys. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1967, 3, 30–39.
7.
BruininksR.H.Auditory and visual perceptual skills related to reading performance of disadvantaged boys. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1969, 29, 179–186.
8.
BruininksR.H.LuckerW.G.GropperR.L.Psycholinguistic abilities of good and poor reading disadvantaged first graders. Elementary School Journal, 1970, 70, 378–386.
9.
BryanQ.R.Relative importance of intelligence and visual perception in predicting reading achievement. California Journal of Educational Research, 1964, 15, 44–48.
10.
BudoffM.QuinlanD.Auditory and visual learning in primary grade children. Child Development, 1964, 35, 583–586. (a)
11.
BudoffM.QuinlanD.Reading progress as related to efficiency of visual and aural learning in the primary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1964, 55, 247–252. (b)
12.
CalfeeR.C.Assessment of independent reading skills: Basic research and practical applications. In ReberA.S.ScarboroughD.L. (Eds.), Towards a psychology of reading. Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum Associates1977.
13.
ChallJ.RoswellF.G.BlumenthalS.H.Auditory blending ability: A factor in success in beginning reading. Reading Teacher, 1963, 17, 113–118.
14.
ChristineD.ChristineC.The relationship of auditory discrimination to articulatory defects and reading retardation. Elementary School Journal, 1964, 65, 97–100.
15.
CohenS.A.Studies in visual perception and reading in disadvantaged children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1969, 10, 498–507.
16.
CooperJ.C.Jr.GaethJ.H.Interactions of modality with age and with meaningfulness in verbal learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1967, 58, 41–44.
17.
CripeA.G.Auditory and visual learning related to ITPA sensory channels. (Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, 1966). Dissertation Abstracts, 1966, 27, 635B. (University Microfilms No. 66–74, 07)
18.
CronbachL.J.How can instruction be adapted to individual differences? In GagneR.M. (Ed.), Learning and individual differences. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill Books1967.
19.
DayW.P.BeachB.R.A survey of the research comparing the visual and auditory presentation of information. Dayton, OH: United States Air Force Base, Air Material Command, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base1950. (Air Force Technical Report 5921)
20.
DykstraR.Auditory discrimination abilities and beginning reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 1966, 1, 5–34.
21.
ForgnoneC.Effects of visual perception and language training upon certain abilities of retarded children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, George Peabody College for Teachers, 1966.
22.
FreerF.J.Visual and auditory perceptual modality differences as related to success in first grade reading word recognition. (Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University, 1971). Dissertation Abstracts International, 1972, 32, 6193A. (University Microfilms No. 72–16, 082)
23.
GoetzingerC.P.DirksD.D.BaerC.J.Auditory discrimination and visual perception in good and poor readers. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, 1960, 69, 121–136.
24.
GoldenN.E.SteinerS.R.Auditory and visual functions in good and poor readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1969, 2, 476–481.
25.
HammillD.D.GoodmanL.WiederholtJ.L.Use of the Frostig DTVP with economically disadvantaged children. Journal of School Psychology, 1971, 9, 430–435.
26.
HareB.A.Perceptual deficits are not a cue to reading problems in second grade. Reading Teacher, 1977, 30, 624–628.
27.
JacobsJ.N.An evaluation of the Frostig visualperception training program. Educational Leadership, 1968, 25, 332–340.
28.
JacobsJ.N.WirthlinL.D.MillerC.B.A follow-up evaluation of the Frostig visual-perception training program. Educational Leadership Research Supplement, 1968, 4, 169–175.
29.
JonesJ.P.A study of the relationships among intersensory transfer, intersensory perceptual shifting, modal preference, and reading achievement at the third grade level. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, 1970.
30.
KampwirthT.J.BatesM.Modality preference and teaching method: A review of the research. Academic Therapy, 1980, 15, 597–605.
31.
KatzP.Verbal discrimination performance of disadvantaged children: stimulus and subject variables. Child Development, 1967, 38, 233–242.
32.
KlapperA.S.BirchH.G.Developmental course of temporal patterning in vision and audition. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1971, 32, 547–555.
33.
KobsT.The relationship between second graders' auditory/visual memory span for random letter sequences and auditory/visual methods of learning to spell. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1972.
34.
LarsenS.C.HammillD.D.The relationship of selected visual-perceptual abilities to school learning. Journal of Special Education, 1975, 9, 281–291.
35.
LinnS.H.From the classroom: Visual perceptual training for kindergarten children. Academic Therapy Quarterly, 1967, 4, 255–258.
36.
LinnS.H.A follow-up: Achievement report of first grade students after visual-perception training in kindergartern. Academic Therapy Quarterly, 1968, 3, 179–180.
37.
ManyW.A.Is there really any difference—reading vs. listening?Reading Teacher, 1965, 19, 109–113.
38.
McNinchG.RichmondM.Auditory perceptual tasks as predictors of first grade reading success. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1972, 35, 7–13.
39.
MillsR.W.An evaluation of techniques for the teaching of word recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida, 1955.
40.
MouldR.E.An evaluation of the effectiveness of a special program for retarded readers manifesting disturbed visual perception. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Washington State University, 1965.
41.
OaklandT.D.Auditory discrimination and SES as correlates of reading ability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1969, 2, 326–329.
42.
O'ConnorC.M.The effects of physical activities upon motor ability, perceptual ability and academic achievement of first graders. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, 1968.
43.
OlsonA.V.The Frostig Developmental Test of Visual Perception as a predictor of specific reading abilities with second grade children. Elementary English, 1966, 43, 869–872.
44.
PolingD.L.The relationship of auditory discrimination to reading achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago, 1969.
45.
RobinsonH.M.Visual and auditory modalities related to methods for beginning reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 1972, 1, 7–39.
46.
RosenC.L.An experimental study of visual perceptual training and reading achievement in first grade. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1966, 22, 979–986.
47.
RosnerJ.Language arts and arithmetic achievement and specifically related perceptual skills. American Educational Research Journal, 1973, 10, 59–68.
48.
SabatinoD.A.DorfmanN.Matching learner aptitude to two commercial reading programs. Exceptional Children, 1974, 41, 85–90.
49.
SabatinoD.A.YsseldykeJ.E.WoolstonJ.Diagnostic-prescriptive perceptual training with mentally retarded children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1973, 78, 7–14.
50.
SamuelsS.J.The effect of letter-names knowledge on learning to read. American Educational Research Journal, 1972, 1, 65–74.
51.
SherkJ.K.A study of the effects of a program of visual perception training on the progress of retarded readers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University, 1968.
52.
SilverstonR.A.DeichmannJ.W.Sense modality research and the acquisition of reading skills. Review of Educational Research, 1975, 45, 149–172.
53.
SmithC.M.The relationship of reading method and reading achievement to ITPA sensory modalities. Journal of Special Education, 1971, 5, 143–149.
54.
SmithI.L.RinglerL.H.Preferred sensory modality, reading readiness, and reading achievement in first-grade children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1971, 32, 764–766.
55.
ThompsonB.B.A longitudinal study of auditory discrimination. Journal of Educational Research, 1963, 56, 376–378.
56.
VandeverT.R.NevilleD.D.Modality aptitude and word recognition. Journal of Reading Behavior, 1974, 6, 195–201.
57.
VellutinoF.R.Dyslexia: Theory and research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1979.
58.
WaughR.P.Relationship between modality preference and performance. Exceptional Children, 1973, 40, 465–469.
59.
WiederholtJ.L.HammillD.D.Use of the Frostig-Horne perception program in the urban school. Psychology in the Schools, 1971, 8, 268–274.
60.
Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration. BeeryK.E.BuktenicaN.Chicago: Parkinson Division, Follett Publishing, 1967.
61.
Bender Visual Motor Gestalt Test. ClawsonA.Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services, 1964.
62.
Gates-MacGinite Reading Test. GatesA.I.MacGiniteW.H.New York: Columbia University Teachers' College Press, 1965.
63.
Gates Primary Reading Tests. GatesA.I.New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University, 1926–58.
