The purpose of this study was to design and evaluate the effectiveness of Concept Diagrams and a related Concept Teaching Routine when used by regular class teachers to present concepts to heterogeneous groupings of students, including learning disabled pupils, in regular classrooms. The study focused upon both teachers and students. The teachers' ability to prepare Concept Diagrams and to implement a Concept Teaching Routine in the classroom was measured. Students were evaluated relative to performance on Tests of Concept Acquisition, regular classroom tests, and notetaking before and after implementation of the Concept Teaching Routine. Results indicated that teachers can select concepts from content material, prepare Concept Diagrams from those concepts, and present concepts to their classes. Both students with learning disabilities and students without learning disabilities showed gains in their performance on Tests of Concept Acquisition and in notetaking when the Concept Teaching Routine was used in the classroom. Gains in performance on regular tests were associated with the Concept Teaching Routine combined with a review procedure.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersP.L.BosC.S. (1984). In the beginning: Vocabulary instruction in content classrooms. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities, 3 (4), 53–65.
2.
ArmbrusterB.B.AndersonT.H. (1982). Idea-mapping: The technique and its use in the classroom or simulating the “ups” and “downs” of reading comprehension (Reading Education Report No. 36). Urbana, IL: Illinois University, Center for the Study of Reading.
3.
AusubelD.P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Grune & Stratton.
4.
AusubelD.P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
5.
BaerD.M.WolfM.M.RisleyT.R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91–97.
6.
BrunerJ.S.GoodnowJ.J.AustinG.A. (1956). The study of thinking. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
7.
BulgrenJ.A. (1987). The development and validation of instructional procedures to teach concepts in secondary mainstream classes which contain students with learning disabilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas.
8.
CusickP.A. (1986). The egalitarian ideal and the American high school: Studies of three schools. NY: Longman.
9.
DeshlerD.D.SchumakerJ.B. (1986). Learning strategies: An instructional alternative for low-achieving adolescents. Exceptional Children, 52 (6), 583–590.
10.
EnglertC.S. (1984). Measuring teacher effectiveness from the teacher's point of view. Focus on Exceptional Children, 17(2). Denver, CO: Love Publishing.
11.
GagnéR. M. (1970). The conditions of learning (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
12.
GoodladJ. (1984). A place called school. New York: McGraw-Hill.
13.
HughesC.A. (1985). A test-taking strategy for emotionally handicapped and learning disabled adolescents. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida.
KlausmeierH.J.FeldmanK.V. (1983). The effects of a definition and a varying number of examples and nonexamples on concept attainment (Technical Report No. 280). Madison, WI: Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Cognitive Learning.
16.
KlausmeierH.SippleT. (1980). Learning and teaching concepts: A strategy for testing applications of theory. New York: Academic Press.
17.
LenzB.K.AlleyG.R.SchumakerJ.B. (1987). Activating the inactive learner: Advance organizers in the secondary content classroom. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10 (1), 53–68.
18.
LevinF.K.ZigmondN.BirchJ.S. (1983). A follow-up study of 52 learning disabled adolescents. Paper presented at AERA, Montreal.
19.
MarkmanE.M. (1985). Comprehension monitoring of developmental and educational issues. In ChipmanS.F.SegalJ.W.GlaserR. (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills (Vol. 2). Research and open questions (pp. 275–291). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.)
MartorellaP.H. (1982). Teaching concepts. In CooperJ.M. (Ed.), Classroom teaching skills (2nd ed.) (pp. 187–231). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.)
22.
The National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: United States Department of Education The National Science Board Commission on Precollege Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology.
23.
(1983). Educating Americans for the 21st century: A report to the American people and the national science board. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
24.
PalinscarA.M.BrownA.L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 1–35.
25.
ParishR.ArendsR. (1983). Why innovative programs are discontinued. Educational Leadership, 62–65.
26.
ParkO. (1984). Example comparison strategy versus attribute identification strategy in concept learning. American Educational Research Journal, 21 (1), 145–162.
27.
PutnamM.L.(in prep.). An investigation of the curricular demands in secondary mainstream classrooms containing mildly handicapped students. Lawrence: The University of Kansas Institute for Research in Learning Disabilities.
28.
RaphaelT.E.GavalekJ.R. (1984). Question-related activities and their relationship to reading comprehension: Some instructional implications. In DuffyG.G.RoehlerL. R.MasonL.J. (Eds.), Comprehension instruction (pp. 234–250) New York: Longman.)
29.
ReynoldsM.C.WangM.C.WalbergH.J. (1987). The necessary restructuring of special and regular education. Exceptional Children, 53, 391–398.
30.
RobbinsD.A. (1984). FIRST-letter mnemonic strategy: A memorization technique for learning disabled high school students. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Kansas.
31.
SchumakerJ.B.DeshlerD.D. (1984). Setting demand variables: A major factor in program planning for the LD adolescent. Topics in Language Disorders, 4 (2), 22–44.
32.
SleeterC.E. (1986). Learning disabilities: The social construction of a special education category. Exceptional Children, 53 (1), 46–54.
33.
StainbackS.StainbackW. (1984). A rationale for the merger of special and regular education. Exceptional Children, 51, 102–111.
34.
TennysonR.D.ChaoJ.N.YoungersJ. (1981). Concept learning effectiveness using prototype and skill development presentation forms. Journal of Educational Psychology73 (3), 326–334.
35.
TennysonR.D.WoolleyF.R.MerrillM.D. (1972). Exemplar and nonexemplar variables which produce correct concept classification behavior and specified classification errors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63 (2), 144–152.
36.
WillM. (1986). Educating students with learning problems: A shared responsibility. Exceptional Children, 52 (5), 411–415.
37.
WongB.Y. L. (1985). Potential means of enhancing content skills acquisition in learning disabled adolescents. Focus on Exceptional Children, 17 (5), 1–8.
