Five- to 13-year-old children of average intelligence who had been identified as having learning disabilities (LD, n = 85) and not identified as having learning disabilities (NLD, n = 94) were individually tested for their ability to mentally anticipate and execute pegboard transformations of square and diamond figures, complete free-hand drawings of these figures, and draw figures on the Developmental Test of Visual Motor Integration. For students with LD and NLD alike: (a) age-related improvements in transformational strategies and in drawing were evident; (b) diamond figures were easier than square figures to transform but more difficult to draw; and (c) significant intra- and intertask correlations were obtained on pegboard and free-hand drawing tasks. These findings are consistent with predictions derived from Piagetian theory and suggest that a general spatial-cognitive mechanism determined performance on the tasks administered. On most tasks, students with LD did not perform as well as same-aged students with NLD even though the effects of IQ were reduced via matching and statistically controlled. The LD-NLD group differences are interpreted as reflecting delayed development in this general spatial-cognitive mechanism in students with LD rather than a specific skill deficit in visual-perceptual processing. Diagnostic and remedial implications of the findings and interpretation are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnderssonK. E.RichardsH. C.HallahanC. P. (1980). Piagetian task performance of learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 13, 501–505.
2.
BeeryK. D. (1989). Developmental test of visual motor integration, administration, scoring, and teaching manual. Cleveland, OH: Modern Curriculum Press.
3.
BrainerdC. J. (1996). Piaget: A centennial celebration. Psychological Science, 7, 191–195.
4.
CarnineD. (1990). Beyond technique-directive instruction and higher-order skills. Direct Instruction News, Spring, 1–13.
5.
CarnineD. (1997). Instructional design in mathematics for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 130–141.
6.
ClementsD. H.BattistaM. T. (1992). Geometry and spatial reasoning. In GrouwsD. A. (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 420–464). New York: Macmillan.
7.
CTB/McGraw-Hill. (1990). Comprehensive Test of Basic Skills-4th Edition. Monterey, CA: CTB/McGraw-Hill.
8.
CTB/McGraw-Hill. (1981). Test of Cognitive Skills1st EditionMonterey, CA: CTB/McGraw-Hill.
9.
CromerR. (1983). Hierarchical planning disability in the drawings and constructions of a special group of severely aphasic children. Brain and Cognition, 2, 144–164.
10.
DeanA. L. (1976). The structure of imagery. Child Development, 47, 949–958.
11.
DeanA. L. (1979a). Patterns of change in relations between anticipatory imagery and operative thought. Developmental Psychology, 15, 153–163.
12.
DeanA. L. (1979b). Knowing and imagining spatial relations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 2, 235–252.
13.
DeanA. L. (1990). The development of mental imagery: A comparison of Piagetian and cognitive psychological perspectives. Annals of Child Development, 7, 105–144.
14.
DeanA. L.ScherzerE. A. (1982). A comparison of reaction time and drawing measures of mental rotation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 34, 20–37.
15.
De LisiR.LockerR.YounissJ. (1976). Anticipatory imagery and spatial operations. Developmental Psychology, 12, 298–310.
16.
DerrA. M. (1985). Conservation and mathematics achievement in the learning disabled child. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18, 333–336.
17.
EngelmannS.CarnineD.SteelyD. B. (1991). Making connections in mathematics. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 292–303.
18.
FinchmanF. (1979). Conservation and cognitive role-taking ability in learning disabled boys. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 12, 34–40.
19.
GinsburgH. P. (1997). Mathematics learning disabilities: A view from developmental psychology. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 20–33.
20.
GouldS. (1981). The mismeasure of man. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
21.
GrobeckerB. (1997). Partitioning and unitizing in children with learning differences. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 249–267.
22.
HofmeisterA. M. (1993). Elitism and reform in school mathematics. Remedial and Special Education, 14, 8–13.
23.
InhelderB. (1966). Cognitive development and its contribution to the diagnosis of some phenomena of mental deficiency. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 12, 299–319.
24.
KamhiA.CattsH.MauerD.ApelK.GentryB. F. (1988). Phonological and spatial processing in language and reading impaired children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 53, 316–327.
25.
Knight-ArestI.ReidD. K. (1980). Peer interaction as a catalyst for conservation acquisition in normal and learning disabled childrenProceedings of the Ninth Interdisciplinary Conference of Piagetian Theory and the Helping Professions.
26.
KoppitzE. M. (1975). The Bender-Gestalt Test for Young Children. New York: Grune & Stratton.
27.
De LisiA. V. McGillicuddyDe LisiR. (1981). Children's strategies in imagining spatio-geometric transformations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 4, 201–222.
28.
MercerD. D.HarrisC. A.MillerS. P. (1993). First invited response: Reforming reforms in mathematics. Remedial and Special Education, 14, 14–19.
29.
MontagueM. (1997). Cognitive strategy instruction in mathematics for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 164–177.
30.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
31.
O'BryanK. F.BoersmaF. J. (1971). Eye movements, peceptual activity, and conservation development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 12, 157–169.
32.
OtisA. S.LennonR. T. (1989). Otis-Lennon School Ability Test6th Edition. Cleveland, OH: The Psychological Corporation.
33.
ParmarR. S.FrazitaR.CawleyJ. F. (1966). Mathematics assessment for students with disabilities: An exploration of content validity. Learning Disability Quarterly, 19, 127–136.
34.
PattonJ. R.CroninM. E.BassettD. S.KoppelA. E. (1997). A life skill approach to mathematics instruction: Preparing students with learning disabilities for the real-life math demands of adulthood. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 178–187.
35.
PiagetJ.InhelderB. (1956). The child's conception of space. New York: Norton.
36.
PiagetJ.InhelderB. (1971). Mental imagery in the child. New York: Basic Books.
37.
PiagetJ.InhelderB.SzeminskaA. (1960). The child's conception of geometry. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
38.
RileyN. (1989). Piagetian cognitive functioning in students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 444–451.
39.
RiveraD. P. (1997). Mathematics education and students with learning disabilities: Introduction to the special series. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 2–19, 68.
40.
RosserR. A.HoranP. F.MattsonS. L.MazzeoJ. (1984). Comprehension of Euclidean space in young children: The early emergence of understanding and its limits. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 110, 21–41.
41.
SaxeG.ShaheenS. (1981). Piagetian theory and the atypical case: An analysis of the developmental Gerstmann Syndrome. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14, 131–135.
42.
SwansonH. L. (1978). Memory development in learning disabled children: Evidence from nonverbal tasks. Journal of Psychology, 100, 9–12.
43.
SwansonH. L. (1993). An information processing analysis of learning disabled children's problem solving. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 861–893.
44.
ThelenE. (1989). Self-organization in developmental processes: Can systems approaches work? In GunnarB. R.ThelenE. (Eds.), Systems and development: The Minnesota symposia on child psychology (Vol. 22, pp. 177–117). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
45.
ThorntonC. A.LangrallC. W.JonesG. A. (1997). Mathematics instruction for elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 142–150.
46.
VellutinoF. R. (1979). Dyslexia: Theory and research. Cambridge, MA: M. I. T. Press.
47.
WansartW. L. (1990). Learning to solve a problem: A micro-analysis of the solution strategies of children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 164–170, 184.
48.
WheatleyG.CobbP. (1990). Analysis of young children's spatial constructions. In SteffeL. P.WoodT. (Eds.), Transforming early childhood mathematics education: International perspectives (pp. 161–173). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
49.
WoodcockR. W.JohnsonB. B. (1989). Tests of Achievement. Allen, TX: DLM.
