The Use of Process Mnemonics in Teaching Students with Mathematics Learning Disabilities

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of process mnemonic (PM) instruction on the computational skills performance of 13- to 14-year-old students with mathematics learning disabilities. Two experiments are described. In Experiment 1, 29 students were randomly assigned to one of four instruction groups: PM, demonstration-imitation (DI), study skills (SS), or no instruction (NI). In Experiment 2, instructors with no vested interest in the outcomes of the study were employed to teach 28 students who were assigned to PM, DI, or NI groups. Both PM and DI students made significant improvements in addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division. However, improvements were often greater for PM students. More importantly, the improvements made by PM students maintained better than those of DI students over six-week (Experiment 1) and eight-week (Experiment 2) follow-up periods.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allinder

R. M.

(1996). When some is not better than none: Effects of differential implementation on curriculum-based measurement. Exceptional Children, 62, 525–536.

American Psychological Association. (1994). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

Anastasi

(1988). Psychological testing (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan.

Anthony

Knight

(1999). Teaching for understanding and memory in year 4–5 mathematics: Research report for the Ministry of Education. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Massey University.

Bana

Korbosky

(1995). Children's knowledge and understanding of basic number facts. Perth, New Zealand: Science and Technology Education Centre.

Batchelor

E. S.

Gray

J. W.

Dean

R. S.

(1990). Empirical testing of a cognitive model to account for neuropsychological functioning underlying arithmetic problem solving. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 38–42.

Biggs

(1994). What are effective schools? Lessons from east and west. Australian Educational Researcher, 21, 19–39.

Blankenship

C. S.

(1978). Remediating systematic inversion errors in subtraction through use of demonstration and feedback. Learning Disability Quarterly, 1, 12–22.

Brown

J.A.C.

(1954). The social psychology of industry. Middlesex, England: Penguin Books.

10.

Cawley

Fitzmaurice

Shaw

Kahn

Bates

(1978). Mathematics and learning disabled youth: The upper grade levels. Learning Disability Quarterly, 2, 29–44.

11.

Chamberlain

(1997). Achievement in mathematics. In Garden

(Ed.), Mathematics and science performance in middle primary school (pp. 63–105). Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.

12.

Chapman

J. W.

St. George

van Kraayenoord

C. E.

(1984). Identification of “learning disabled” pupils in a New Zealand Form 1 sample. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 10, 141–149.

13.

Ernest

(1996, March) The negative influence of ‘progressive’ ideas in school mathematics. Mathematics in School, 6–7.

14.

Fuchs

L. S.

(1988). Effects of computer-managed instruction on teachers' implementation of systematic monitoring programs and student achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 81, 294–304.

15.

Gray

Mulhern

(1995). Does children's memory for addition facts predict general mathematical ability? Perceptual and Motor Skills, 81, 163–167.

16.

Hannon

(1995). Literacy, home and school: Research and practice in teaching literacy with parents. London: The Falmer Press.

17.

Heege

(1985). The acquisition of basic multiplication skills. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 16, 375–388.

18.

Higbee

K. L.

(1987). Process mnemonics: Principles, prospects, and problems. In McDaniel

M. A.

Pressley

(Eds.), Imagery and related mnemonic processes: Theories, individual differences, and applications (pp. 407–427). New York: Springer-Verlag.

19.

Higbee

K. L.

Kunihira

(1985). Cross-cultural applications of yodai mnemonics in education. Educational Psychologist, 20, 57–64.

20.

Jones

Kershaw

Sparrow

(1994). Number sense and computation in the classroom. Perth, New Zealand: Mathematics, Science and Technology Education Centre.

21.

Kauffman

J. M.

(1981). Characteristics of children's behaviour disorders (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.

22.

Kosc

(1974). Developmental dyscalculia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7, 164–177.

23.

Levin

J. R.

(1983). Pictorial strategies for school learning: Practical illustrations. In Pressley

Levin

J. R.

(Eds.), Cognitive strategy research: Educational applications (pp. 213–237). New York: Springer-Verlag.

24.

Maier

(1980, December). Folk mathematics. Mathematics Teacher, 93, 21–24.

25.

Manalo

(1991). The incorporation of process mnemonic instruction in teaching computational skills: A case report on a mathematics learning disabled individual. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 13(4), 21–34.

26.

Mastropieri

M.A.

Scruggs

T.E.

Fulk

B.J.M.

(1990). Teaching abstract vocabulary with the keyword method: Effects on recall and comprehension. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 92–96, 107.

27.

Mastropieri

M.A.

Scruggs

T.E.

Levin

J.R.

(1987). Mnemonic instruction in special education. In McDaniel

M. A.

Pressley

(Eds.), Imagery and related mnemonic processes (pp. 358–376). New York: Springer-Verlag.

28.

Mercer

C. D.

(1987). Students with learning disabilities (3rd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing.

29.

Miller

S. P.

Mercer

C. D.

(1993). Using a graduated word problem sequence to promote problem-solving skills. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 8, 169–174.

30.

Pereira

J. A.

Winton

A. S. W.

(1991). Teaching and remediation of mathematics: A review of behavioural research. Journal of Behavioural Education, 1, 5–36.

31.

Reid

Gilmore

(1988). Test of Scholastic Abilities: Technical supplement. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.

32.

Reisman

F. K.

Kauffman

S. H.

(1980). Teaching mathematics to children with special needs. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.

33.

Resnick

Ford

(1981). The psychology of mathematics for instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

34.

Rivera

D. M.

Smith

D. D.

(1987). The influence of modeling on acquisition and generalization of computational skills: A summary of findings from three sites. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 69–80.

35.

Rivera

D. M.

Smith

D. D.

(1988). Using a demonstration strategy to teach midschool students with learning disabilities how to compute long division. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 77–81.

36.

Scruggs

T. E.

Mastropieri

M. A.

McLoone

B. B.

Levin

J. R.

Morrison

C. R.

(1987). Mnemonic facilitation of learning disabled students' memory for expository prose. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 27–34.

37.

Smith

D. D.

Lovitt

T. C.

(1975). The use of modeling techniques to influence the acquisition of computational arithmetic skills in learning-disabled children. In Ramp

Semb

(Eds.), Behaviour analysis: Areas of research and application (pp. 283–308). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

38.

Swanson

H. L.

Cochran

K. F.

Ewers

C. A.

(1990). Can learning disabilities be determined from working memory performance? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 59–67.

39.

Tuckman

B. W.

(1978). Conducting educational research (2nd ed.). San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

40.

Waldron

K. A.

Saphire

D. G.

(1992). Perceptual and academic patterns of learning-disabled/gifted students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 74, 599–609.

41.

Xin

Y. P.

Jitendra

A. K.

(1999). The effects of instruction in solving mathematical word problems for students with learning problems: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Special Education, 32, 207–225