Middle School Students' Mathematical Problem Solving: An Analysis of Think-Aloud Protocols

Abstract

Using a cognitive-metacognitive theoretical framework, this study examined the verbalizations of middle school students as they thought aloud while solving three mathematical word problems. Middle school subjects who had been identified as learning disabled, average achieving, and gifted were given demonstrations and practice in thinking aloud and were then instructed to solve one-step, two-step, and three-step word problems while thinking aloud. A priori categories were developed based on information-processing theory and a cognitive-metacognitive perspective of mathematical problem solving. Verbalizations were coded, and between-group and grade comparisons of the number of verbalizations within categories were conducted. The relationship between type of verbalization and overall performance was also analyzed. The findings support Ericcson and Simon's (1980) view of concurrent verbalization as a technique for assessing cognitive processes and Swanson's (1988) notion that students with learning disabilities may use a qualitatively different approach to problem solving than their nondisabled peers.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bos

Filip

(1984). Comprehension monitoring in learning disabled and average students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 229–233.

Brown

A.L.

(1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In Glaser

(Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 77–165). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Englert

Raphael

Fear

Anderson

(1988). Students' metacognitive knowledge about how to write informational text. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11, 18–46.

Ericcson

K.A.

Simon

(1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Reports, 87, 215–250.

Flower

Hayes

(1980). The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In Gregg

Steinberg

(Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 31–50). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Garner

(1988). Verbal-report data on cognitive and metacognitive strategies. In Weinstein

Goetz

Alexander

(Eds.), Learning and study strategies: Issues in assessment, instruction, and evaluation (pp. 63–67). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Glaser

(1991). Expertise and assessment. In Wittrock

Baker

(Eds.), Testing and cognition (pp. 17–30). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Hannah

C.L.

(1990, April). Metacognitive strategies used by learning-disabled gifted students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.

Kaufman

A.S.

(1976). A four-test short form of the WISC-R. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1, 180–196.

10.

Kazdin

A.E.

(1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.

11.

Martin

S.H.

(1987, December). The meaning-making strategies reported by proficient readers and writers. Paper presented at the Thirty-Seventh Annual Meeting of the National Reading Conference, St. Petersburg, FL.

12.

Mayer

R.E.

(1985). Mathematical ability. In Sternberg

R.J.

(Ed.), Human abilities: Information processing approach (pp. 127–150). San Francisco: Freeman.

13.

Meichenbaum

(1990, May). In search of student expertise in the classroom: A metacognitive analysis. Paper presented at the Annual OSERS Research Project Directors' Meeting, Washington, DC.

14.

Montague

Applegate

(in press). Mathematical problem-solving characteristics of middle school students with learning disabilities. The Journal of Special Education.

15.

Montague

Bos

(1990). Cognitive and metacognitive characteristics of eighth-grade students' mathematical problem solving. Learning and Individual Differences, 2, 109–127.

16.

Montague

Bos

Doucette

(1991). Affective, cognitive, and metacognitive attributes of eighth-grade mathematical problem solvers. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 6, 145–151.

17.

Neisser

(1967). Cognitive psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

18.

Pressley

Borkowski

Schneider

(1989). Good information processing: What it is and how education can promote it. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 857–867.

19.

Schoenfeld

A.H.

(1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

20.

Shriffin

Schneider

(1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–189.

21.

Simon

(1979). Models of thought. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.

22.

Sternberg

R.J.

(1981). A componential theory of intellectual giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 25, 86–93.

23.

Sternberg

R.J.

(1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.

24.

Swanson

H.L.

(1988). Learning disabled children's problem solving: Identifying mental processes underlying intelligent performance. Intelligence, 12, 261–278.

25.

Swanson

H.L.

O'Connor

Cooney

(1990). An information processing analysis of expert and novice teachers' problem solving. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 533–556.

26.

Wechsler

(1974). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.

27.

Wong

Blenkinsop

(1989). Cognitive and metacognitive aspects of learning disabled adolescents' composing problems. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 300–322.