This study examined the effects of a cognitive mapping strategy on the literal and inferential reading comprehension of students with mild disabilities — learning disabilities (LD) and educable mental retardation (EMR). Thirty students with mild disabilities who exhibited poor reading comprehension, as evidenced by low reading comprehension scores on standardized tests, were matched on three variables (disability, grade, and reading achievement) and assigned to either an experimental or a control group. Through a strategy format, students in the experimental group were taught to independently create cognitive maps from reading passages. Students who were taught the cognitive mapping strategy demonstrated substantial gains in both literal and inferential comprehension measures with below-grade level reading passages as well as on-grade level reading passages. The limitations of the research and implications of this strategy for classroom application are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AaronsonS. (1985). The use of study maps and visual mnemotechnics as an aid to recall. Reading World, 24, 97–105.
2.
BorkowskiJ.G.EstradaM.T.MilsteadM.HaleC. (1989). General problem-solving skills: Relations between metacognition and strategic processing. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 57–70.
3.
BorgW.GallM. (1979). Educational research: Introduction. New York: Longman.
4.
BosC.AndersP. (1987). Semantic feature analysis: An interactive teaching strategy for facilitating learning from text. Learning Disabilities Focus, 3, 55–59.
5.
BosC.S.AndersP.L. (1990). Effects of interactive vocabulary instruction on the vocabulary learning and reading comprehension of junior-high learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13, 31–42.
6.
BosC.FilipD. (1984). Comprehension monitoring strategies in learning disabled and average students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 229–233.
7.
CampbellD.StanleyJ. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
8.
DarchC.CarnineD. (1986). Teaching content area material to learning disabled students. Exceptional Children, 53, 240–246.
9.
DarchC.CarnineD.W.KameenuiE.J. (1986). The role of graphic organizers and social structure in content area instruction. Journal of Reading Behavior, 18, 275–295.
10.
DarchC.EavesR. (1986). Visual displays to increase comprehension of high school learning disabled students. Exceptional Children, 20, 309–318.
11.
DeshlerD.SchumakerJ. (1988). An instructional model for teaching students how to learn. In GradenJ.L.CurtisM.J. (Eds.), Alternative educational delivery systems: Enhancing instructional options for all students (pp. 319–411). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
12.
EllisE.S.DeshlerD.D.LenzB.K.SchumakerJ.B.ClarkF.L. (1991). An instructional model for teaching learning strategies. Focus on Exceptional Children, 23, 1–24.
13.
EnglertC.MariageT. (1991). Making students partners in the comprehension process: Organizing the reading “posse.”Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 123–138.
FryE. (1980). Comments on the preceding Harris and Jacobson comparison of the Fry, Spache, and Harris-Jacobson readability formulas. The Reading Teacher, 33, 942–926.
16.
FusaroJ. (1988). Applying statistical rigor to a validation study of the Fry Readability Graph. Reading Research and Instruction, 28, 44–48.
GraesserA.C. (1981). Prose composition beyond the word. New York: Springer-Verlag.
19.
GunningR. (1979). Fog index of a passage. Academic Therapy, 14, 489–491.
20.
HarrisA.JacobsonM. (1980). A comparison of the Fry, Spache, and Harris-Jacobson readability formulas for primary grades. The Reading Teacher, 33, 920–923.
21.
HarrisA.SipayE. (1990). How to increase reading ability. New York: Longman.
22.
HeimlichJ.PittlemanS. (1986). Semantic mapping: Classroom applications. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
23.
HornW.O'DonnellJ.VitulanoL. (1983). Long-term follow-up studies of learning disabled persons. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 16, 542–555.
24.
HortonS.LovittT.BergerudD. (1990). The effectiveness of graphic organizers for three classifications of secondary students in content area classes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 12–29.
25.
IdolL. (1987). Group story mapping: A comprehensive strategy for both skilled and unskilled readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 196–205.
26.
IdolL. (1988). Jonny can't read: Does the fault lie with the book, the teacher, or Jonny?Remedial and Special Education, 9, 8–25.
27.
JensenA.RohwerW. (1963). Verbal mediation in paired-associate and serial learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1, 346–352.
28.
Kansas State Board of Education. (1991). State regulations for special education. Topeka: KSBE.
KavaleB.FornessT. (1985). Learning disability and the history of science: Paradigm or paradox?Remedial and Special Education, 6, 12–23.
31.
KavaleB.FornessT.BenderC. (1987). Handbook of learning disabilities. New York: Little Brown Book Co.
32.
KerlingerF.N. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research. Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
33.
McIntoshR.VaughnS.SchummJ.S.HaagerD.LeeO. (1994). Observations of students with learning disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 60, 249–261.
34.
McCaggE.DansereauD. (1991). A convergent paradigm for examining knowledge mapping as a learning strategy. Journal of Educational Research, 84, 317–324.
35.
McCoyK.M.MaagJ.W.RuckerS. (1989). Semantic mapping as a communication tool in seriously emotionally handicapped classrooms. Behavioral Disorders, 14, 226–235.
36.
MooreD.W.ReadenceJ.E. (1980). A meta-analysis of the effect of graphic organizers on learning from text. In KamilM.L.MoeA.L. (Eds.), Twenty-ninth yearbook of the national reading conference (pp. 145–152). Washington, DC: National Reading Conference.
37.
National Education Assessment of Educational Achievement. (1985). Reading performance trends, 1971–1984: Their significance. Princeton, NJ: NAEA.
38.
ParisS.CrossD.LipsonM. (1984). Informed strategies for learning: A program to improve children's reading awareness and comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1239–1252.
39.
ParisS.MyersM. (1988). Comprehension monitoring, memory, and study strategies of good and poor readers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 13, 5–22.
40.
PehrssonR.DennerP. (1988). Semantic organizers: Implications for reading and writing. Topics in Language Disorders, 8, 24–37.
41.
PehrssonR.RobinsonH. (1988). The semantic organizer approach to reading and writing instruction. Rockville, MD: Aspen.
42.
RhodyR.AlexanderJ. (1980). A scale for assessing attitudes towards reading in secondary schools. Journal of Reading, 23, 609–614.
43.
RichgelsD.McGeeL.LomaxR.SheardC. (1987). Awareness of four text structures: Effects on recall of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 177–196.
44.
RosenbergM.BottD.MajsterekD.ChiangB.GartlandD.WessonC.GrahamS.Smith-MylesB.MillerM.SwansonH.L.BenderW.RiveraD.WilsonR. (1992). Minimum standards for the description of participants in learning disabilities research. Learning Disability Quarterly, 15, 65–70.
45.
RyanE.WeedK.ShortE. (1986). Cognitive behavior modification: Promoting active, self-regulatory learning styles. In TorgesenJ.WongB. (Eds.), Psychological and educational perspective on learning disabilities (pp. 367–397). New York: Academic Press.
46.
ScanlonD.DuranG.ReyesE.GallegoM. (1992). Interactive semantic mapping: An interactive approach to enhancing LD students' content area comprehension. Learning Disabilities Practice and Research, 7, 142–146.
47.
SchumakerJ.DeshlerD. (1984). Setting demand variables: a major factor in program planning for the LD adolescent. Topics in Language Disorders, 4, 22–40.
48.
ScruggsT.E.LaufenbergR. (1986). Transformational mnemonic strategies for retarded learners. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 21, 165–173.
49.
ScruggsT.E.MastropieriM.A. (1988). Are learning disabled students “Test-wise”?: A review of recent research. Learning Disabilities Focus, 3, 87–97.
50.
ScruggsT.TolfaD. (1985). Improving the test-taking skills of learning disabled students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 60, 847–850.
51.
SmithC.R. (1994). Learning disabilities: The interaction of learner, task, and setting (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
52.
SPSS/PC [Computer software]. (1990). Chicago: SPSS Inc.
53.
StevensJ. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
54.
SwansonH.L. (1989a). The effects of central processing strategies on learning disabled, mildly retarded, average, and gifted children's elaborative encoding abilities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 47, 370–397.
55.
SwansonH.L. (1989b). Strategy instruction: Overview of principles and procedures for effective use. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 3–15.
56.
TaylorB.M.BeachR. (1984). The effects of text structure on middle-grade students' comprehension and production of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 134–146.
57.
TaylorB.M.SamuelsS.J. (1983). Children's use of text structure in recall of expository material. American Educational Research Journal, 20, 517–528.
58.
TorgesenJ.K. (1982). The learning disabled child as an inactive learner: Educational implications. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities, 2, 45–52.
59.
VellutinoF.ScanlonD. (1986). Experimental evidence for the effects of instructional bias on word identification. Exceptional Children, 53, 145–155.
60.
WechslerD. (1981). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
61.
WelchM. (1992). The PLEASE strategy: A metacognitive learning strategy for improving the paragraph writing of students with mild learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 15, 119–128.
WinneP.H.GrahamL.ProckL. (1993). A model of poor readers' text-based inferencing: Effects of explanatory feedback. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 53–66.
64.
WongB. (1978). The effects of directive cues on the organization of memory and recall in good and poor readers. The Journal of Educational Research, 72, 32–38.
65.
WongB. (1979). Increasing retention of main ideas through questioning strategies. Learning Disability Quarterly, 2, 42–47.
66.
WongB. (1987). How do the results of metacognitive research impact on the learning disabled individual?Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 189–195.
67.
WongB. (1994). Instructional parameters promoting transfer of learned strategies in students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 17, 110–120.
68.
WongB.JonesW. (1982). Increasing metacomprehension in learning disabled and normally achieving students through self-questioning training. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 228–239.
69.
WongB.WongR. (1986). Study behavior as a function of metacognitive knowledge about critical task variables: An investigation of above average, average, and learning disabled readers. Learning Disabilities Research, 1, 101–111.
