This article reports two studies that examined the relationship between word identification speed and story reading fluency, as indicated by speed and accuracy as well as comprehension. Poor readers in grade 4 were trained to read a set of single words and were then asked to repeatedly read stories that contained the trained words or stories with words not included in the training set. Benefits to text reading from single-word practice were observed, even for children who were particularly slow namers. The results are related to theoretical links between fluency and comprehension and to theories of developmental deficits.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsM.J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
BiemillerA. (1977–78). Relationships between oral reading rates for letters, words, and simple text in the development of reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 13, 223–253.
3.
BowersP.G. (1993). Text reading and rereading: Determinants of fluency beyond word recognition. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25, 133–153.
4.
BowersP.G.SwansonL.B. (1991). Naming speed deficits in reading disability: Multiple measures of a singular process. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 51, 195–219.
5.
BowersP.G.WolfM. (1993a). Theoretical links among naming speed, precise timing mechanisms and orthographic skill in dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 69–85.
6.
BowersP.G.WolfM. (1993b). A double-deficit hypothesis for developmental reading disorders. Paper presented to the Society for Research in Child Development, New Orleans.
7.
CarrT.H.LevyB.A. (Eds.). (1990). Reading and its development: Component skills approaches. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
8.
DahlP.R. (1979). An experimental program for teaching high speed word recognition and comprehension skills. In ButtonJ.E.LovittT.C.RowlandT.D. (Eds.), Communication research in learning disabilities and mental retardation (pp. 33–65). Baltimore: University Park Press.
9.
DowhowerS.L. (1987). Effects of repeated reading on second-grade transitional readers' fluency and comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 389–406.
10.
EhriL.C. (1992). Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. In GoughP.B.EhriL.C.TreimanR. (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107–143). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11.
FaulknerH.J.LevyB.A. (1994). How text difficulty and reader skill interact to produce differential reliance on word and content overlap in reading transfer. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 58, 1–24.
12.
FleisherL.S.JenkinsJ.R.PanyD. (1979). Effects on poor readers' comprehension of training in rapid decoding. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 30–48.
13.
LaBergeD.SamuelsJ. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 293–323.
14.
LemoineH.E.LevyB.A.HutchinsonA. (1993). Increasing the naming speed of poor readers: Representations formed across repetitions. Journal ofExperimental Child Psychology, 55, 297–328.
15.
O'SheaL.J.SindelarP.T.O'SheaD.J. (1985). The effects of repeated reading and attentional cues on reading fluency and comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 17, 129–142.
16.
O'SheaL.J.SindelarP.T.O'SheaD.J. (1987). The effects of repeated reading and attentional cues on reading fluency and comprehension of learning disabled readers. Learning Disabilities Research, 2, 103–109.
17.
PerfettiC.A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In GoughP.B.EhriL.C.TreimanR. (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145–174). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18.
PerfettiC.A.FingerE.HogaboamT.W. (1978). Sources of vocalization latency differences between skilled and less skilled young readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 730–739.
19.
PerfettiC.A.LesgoldA.M. (1977). Discourse comprehension and sources of individual differences. In JustM.CarpenterP. (Eds.), Cognitive processes in comprehension (pp. 57–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20.
RashotteC.A.TorgesenJ.K. (1985). Repeated reading and reading fluency in learning disabled children. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 180–202.
21.
RosnerJ.SimonD.P. (1971). The auditory analysis test: An initial report. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 4, 1–15.
22.
SamuelsJ. (1979). The method of repeated readings. The Reading Teacher, 32, 403–408.
23.
SindelarP.T.MondaL.E.O'SheaL.J. (1990). Effects of repeated readings on instructional and mastery level readers. Journal of Educational Research, 83, 220–226.
24.
StanovichK.E. (1981). Relationships between word decoding speed, general name retrieval ability, and reading progress in first-grade children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 809–815.
