Technology to assist persons with disabilities has received considerable attention over the last decade. However, little attention has been directed toward technology to help persons with learning disabilities compensate for their difficulties. This article will provide an overview of assistive technologies currently available to assist persons with learning disabilities and suggest a basis from which the field of learning disabilities can take a leadership position in exploring and advancing the use of assistive technology for persons with learning disabilities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BlalockJ. (1981). Persistent problems and concerns of young adults with learning disabilities. In CruickshankW.SilversA. (Eds.), Bridges to tomorrow, Vol. 2: The best of ACLD (pp. 35–55). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
2.
BlalockJ.JohnsonD. (1987). Primary concerns and group characteristics. In JohnsonD.J.BlalockJ.W. (Eds.), Adults with learning disabilities: Clinical studies (pp. 31–45). Orlando, FL: Grune & Stratton.
3.
BrownC. (1987). Computer access in higher education for students with disabilities. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education.
4.
ChiangB. (1986). Initial learning and transfer effects of microcomputer drills on LD students' multiplication skills. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 118–123.
5.
CollinsT. (1990). Evaluating spell checkers, thesauruses, dictionaries and grammar editors for the community college student with learning disabilities. In MurphyH.J. (Ed.), Proceedings of the fifth annual conference on technology and persons with disabilities, 5, 163–175.
6.
CutlerE. (1990). Evaluating spell checkers, thesauruses, dictionaries and grammar editors for the community college student with learning disabilities. In MurphyH.J. (Ed.), Proceedings of the fifth annual conference on technology and persons with disabilities, 5, 163–175.
FrankelS. (1990, May 27). Write right. The Sunday Oregonian, pp. K1, B4.
9.
GerberP.SchniedersC.S.ParadiseL.V.ReiffH.B.GinsbergR.J.PoppP.A. (1990). Persisting problems of adults with learning disabilities: Self-reported comparisons from their school-age and adult years. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 570–573.
10.
GrayR.A. (1981). Services for the LD adult: A working paper. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 4, 426–431.
11.
GreenP.BrightmanA.J. (1990). Independence day: Designing computer solutions for individuals with disability. Allen, TX: DLM.
12.
GreggN.HoyC. (1989). Coherence: The comprehension and production abilities of college writers who are normally achieving, learning disabled and underprepared. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 370–372.
13.
HasbrouckJ.M. (1980). Performance of students with auditory figure-ground disorders under conditions of unilateral and bilateral ear occlusion. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 13, 548–551.
14.
HoffmanF.J.SheldonK.L.MinskoffE.H.SautterS.W.SteidleE.F.BakerD.P.BaileyM.B.EcholsL.D. (1987). Needs of learning disabled adults. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 43–52.
15.
HughesC.A.SmithJ.O. (1990). Cognitive and academic performance of college students with learning disabilities: A synthesis of the literature. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13, 66–79.
16.
JohnsonD. (1987). Disorders of written language. In JohnsonD.J.BlalockJ.W. (Eds.), Adults with learning disabilities: Clinical studies (pp. 173–203). Orlando, FL: Grune & Stratton.
17.
JohnsonG.GerstenR.CarnineD. (1987). Effects of instructional design variables on vocabulary acquisition of LD students: A study of computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 206–213.
18.
JonesK.M.TorgesenJ.K.SextonM.A. (1987). Using a computer guided practice to increase decoding fluency in learning disabled children: A study using the Hint and Hunt I program. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 122–128.
19.
KerchnerL.B.KistingerB.J. (1984). Language processing/word processing: Written expression, computers and learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 329–335.
20.
LeeW.W. (1987). Microcomputer courseware production and evaluation guidelines for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 436–438.
21.
MangrumD.T.IIStrichartS.S. (1988). College and the learning disabled student. Philadelphia: Grune and Stratton.
22.
McCroskeyR.ThompsonN. (1973). Comprehension of rate controlled speech by children with specific learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 6, 29–35.
23.
NorrisM.GraefJ. (1990). Screen reading programs for students with learning disabilities. In MurphyH.J. (Ed.), Proceedings of the fifth annual conference on technology and persons with disabilities, 5, 491–499.
24.
PoplinM. (1988). The reductionist fallacy in learning disabilities: Replicating the past by reducing the present. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 389–400.
25.
PrimusC. (1990). Computer assistance model for learning disabled. (Grant #G008630152-88). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitation Services.
Technology-Related Assistance for Individuals with Disabilities Act of 1988, P.L. 100-47, 29 U.S.C. 2201, 2202. (1988).
28.
TorgesenJ.K.WatersM.D.CohenA.L.TorgesenJ.L. (1988). Improving sight-word recognition skills in LD children: An evaluation of three computer program variations. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11, 125–132.
29.
VogelS.A. (1985). Syntactic complexity in written expression of LD college writers. Annals of Dyslexia, 35, 137–157.
30.
VogelS.A. (1987). Issues and concerns in LD college programming. In JohnsonD.J.BlalockJ.W. (Eds.), Adults with learning disabilities: Clinical studies (pp. 239–275). Orlando, FL: Grune & Stratton.
31.
VogelS.A.MoranM.R. (1982). Written language disorders in learning disabled students: A preliminary report. In CruickshankW.M.LernerJ.W. (Eds.), Coming of age, Vol. 3: The best of ACLD (pp. 211–225). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
32.
WoodwardJ.P.CarnineD.W. (1988). Antecedent knowledge and intelligent computer assisted instruction. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 131–139.
