A large number of secondary students read between the 2.5 and the 5.0 grade level. What separates many of these students from their higher performing peers is their inability to read multisyllabic words and to read fluently. These students need instruction in decoding long words using one of three approaches: reading segmented words part by part, decoding different syllable types, or using a flexible strategy for reading long words. These students also need sufficient reading practice to increase their reading rates. This practice might include oral guided reading, choral reading, partner reading, and/or repeated reading activities. The authors suggest that significant gains in reading are more likely to occur when teachers implement research-validated programs that have a well-designed sequence, provide systematic instruction to students, and furnish adequate practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsM.J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
AllingtonR.L. (1977). If they don't read much, how they ever gonna get good?Journal of Reading, 21, 57–61.
3.
ArcherA.L. (1981). Decoding of multisyllabic words by skill deficient fourth and fifth grade students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.
4.
ArcherA.L.GleasonM.M.VachonV.L. (2000). REWARDS Reading excellence: Word attack and rate development strategies. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
5.
ArcherA.L.GleasonM.M.VachonV.L.HollenbeckK. (2003). Instructional strategies for teaching struggling fourth- and fifth-grade students to read long words. Manuscript in preparation.
6.
BorkowskiJ.G.MuthukrishnaN. (1992). Moving metacognition into the classroom: “Working models” and effective strategy teaching. In PressleyM.HarrisK.R.GuthrieJ.T. (Eds.), Promoting academic competence and literacy in schools (pp. 477–501). San Diego, CA: Academic.
7.
BryantD.P.VaughnS.Linan-ThompsonS.UgelN.HamffA.HougenM. (2000). Reading outcomes for students with and without learning disabilities in general education middle school content area classes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 23(3), 24–38.
8.
CalfeeR.C.PiontkowskiD.C. (1981). The reading diary: Acquisition of decoding. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 346–373.
9.
CampbellK.U. (1995). Great leaps reading program. Gainesville, FL: Diarmuid.
10.
CampbellM.L. (1988). Corrective Reading program evaluated with secondary students in San Diego. ADI News, 7(4), 15–17.
11.
CanneyG.SchreinerR. (1977). A study of the effectiveness of selected syllabication rules and phonogram patterns for word attack. Reading Research Quarterly, 12, 102–114.
12.
CarverR.P. (1997). Reading for one second, one minute, or one year from the perspective of rauding theory. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 3–43.
13.
ChardD.J.VaughnS.TylerB.J. (2002). A synthesis of research on effective interventions for building reading fluency with elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 386–406.
14.
CunninghamA.E.StanovichK.E. (1998). What reading does for the mind. American Educator, 22, 8–15.
15.
CunninghamP.M. (1998). The multisyllabic word dilemma: Helping students build meaning, spell, and read “big” words. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 14, 189–218.
16.
DalyE.J.MartensB.K. (1994). A comparison of three interventions for increasing oral reading performance: Application of the instructional hierarchy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 459–469.
17.
DowhowerS.L. (1987). Effects of repeated reading on second-grade transitional readers' fluency and comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 389–406.
18.
DowhowerS.L. (1994). Repeated reading revisited: Research into practice. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 10, 343–358.
19.
EllisE.S.LenzB.K.SabornieE.J. (1987). Generalization and adaptation of learning strategies to natural environments: Part 2. Research into practice. Remedial and Special Education, 8(2), 6–23.
FleisherL.S.JenkinsJ.R.PanyD. (1979). Effects on poor readers' comprehension of training in rapid decoding. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 30–48.
22.
FowlerC.A.LibermanI.Y.ShankweilerD. (1977). On interpreting the error pattern of the beginning reader. Language and Speech, 20, 162–173.
23.
FuchsD.FuchsL.S.MathesP.G.SimmonsD.C. (1997). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to diversity. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 174–206.
24.
FuchsL.S.FuchsD. (1986). Effects of systematic formative evaluation: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 53, 199–208.
25.
FuchsL.S.FuchsD.KazdanS. (1999). Effects of peer-assisted learning strategies on high school students with serious reading problems. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 309–318.
26.
FuchsL.S.FuchsD.MaxwellL. (1988). The validity of informal reading comprehension measures. Remedial and Special Education, 9, 20–29.
27.
GilbertL.M.WilliamsR.L.McLaughlinT.F. (1986). Use of assisted reading to increase correct reading rates and decrease error rates of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 255–257.
28.
GoughP.B.HooverW.PetersonC.L. (1996). Some observations on the simple view of reading. In CornoldiC.OakhillJ. (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties (pp. 1–13). Mahawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
29.
GreeneJ.F. (1996). LANGUAGE! Effects of an individualized structured language curriculum for middle and high school students. Annals of Dyslexia, 46, 97–121.
30.
GreeneJ.F. (1998). Another chance: Help for older students with limited literacy. American Educator, 22, 74–79.
GreifI.P. (1981). The utility of the “vowels in open syllable” and “vowels in closed syllable” phonic rules when pronouncing two-syllable words. Normal: Illinois State University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 277 985)
33.
GrossenB.J. (2002). The BIG accommodation model: The direct instruction model for secondary schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 7(2), 241–263.
34.
GrossenB.J.(in press). Success of a direct instruction model at a secondary level school with high-risk students. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties.
35.
HasbrouckJ.E.IhnotC.RogersG.H. (1999). “Read Naturally”: A strategy to increase oral reading fluency. Reading Research and Instruction, 39, 27–38.
36.
HeckelmanR.G. (1969). A neurological-impress method of remedial reading instruction. Academic Therapy, 5, 277–282.
37.
HermanP.A. (1985). The effect of repeated readings on reading rate, speech pauses, and word recognition accuracy. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 553–565.
38.
HomanS.P.KlesiusJ.P.HiteS. (1993). Effects of repeated readings and nonrepetitive strategies on students' fluency and comprehension. Journal of Educational Research, 87, 94–99.
39.
HornerR.H.BellamyG.T.ColvinG.T. (1984). Responding in the presence of nontrained stimuli: Implications of generalization error patterns. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 9(4), 287–295.
40.
HudsonR.MercerC.D.LaneH. (2000). Exploring reading fluency: A paradigmatic overview. Unpublished manuscript, University of Florida, Gainesville.
41.
IhnotC.MatsoffJ.GavinJ. (2001). Read naturally. St. Paul, MN: Read Naturally.
42.
JenkinsJ.R.FuchsL.S.EspinC.van den BroekP.DenoS.L. (2000, February). Effects of task format and performance dimension on word reading measures: Criterion validity, sensitivity to impairment, and context facilitation. Paper presented at the Pacific Coast Research Conference, San Diego, CA.
43.
JustM.A.CarpenterP.A. (1987). The psychology of reading and language comprehension. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
44.
KrashenS.D. (1993). The power of reading: Insights from the research. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
45.
KuhnM.R.StahlS.A. (2000). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices (Tech. Rep. No. 2–008). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement.
46.
LaBergeD.SamuelsS.J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 292–323.
47.
LenzB.K.HughesC.A. (1990). A word identification strategy for adolescents with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 149–158, 163.
48.
LyonG.R. (1995). Research initiatives in learning disabilities: Contributions from scientists supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Journal of Child Neurology, 10, 120–126.
49.
MastropieriM.A.LeinareA.ScruggsT.E. (1999). Strategies to increase reading fluency. Intervention in School and Clinic, 34, 278–283, 292.
50.
MathesP.G.FuchsL.S. (1993). Peer-mediated reading instruction in special education resource rooms. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 8, 233–243.
51.
McCrayA.D.VaughnS.NealL.I. (2001). Not all students learn to read by third grade: Middle school students speak out about their reading disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 35, 17–30.
52.
MercerC.D.CampbellK.U.MillerM.D.MercerK.D.LaneH.B. (2000). Effects of a reading fluency intervention for middle schoolers with specific learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15(4), 179–189.
53.
MeyerM.S.FeltonR.H. (1999). Repeated reading to enhance fluency: Old approaches and new directions. Annals of Dyslexia, 49, 283–306.
54.
MoatsL.C. (2000). Speech to print: Language essential for teachers. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
55.
MoatsL.C. (2001). When older students can't read. Educational Leadership, 58, 36–40.
56.
MoatsL.C.(in press). Efficacy of a structured, systematic language curriculum for adolescent poor readers. Reading and Writing Quarterly.
57.
NagyW.AndersonR.C. (1984). How many words are there in printed school English?Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 304–330.
58.
National Education Goals Panel. (1995). National education goals report: Building a nation of learners. Washington, DC: Author.
59.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Reports of the subgroup. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health.
60.
O'SheaL.J.SindelarP.T.O'SheaD.J. (1985). The effects of repeated readings and attentional cues on reading fluency and comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 17, 129–142.
61.
O'SheaL.J.SindelarP.T.O'SheaD. (1987). The effects of repeated readings and attentional cues on reading fluency and comprehension of learning disabled readers. Learning Disabilities Research, 2, 103–109.
62.
PerfettiC.A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
63.
PerfettiC.A. (1986). Continuities in reading acquisition, reading skill and reading ability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 11–21.
64.
RashotteC.A.TorgesenJ.K. (1985). Repeated reading and reading fluency in learning disabled children. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 180–188.
65.
RasinskiT.V. (1990). Effects of repeated reading and listening-while-reading on reading fluency. Journal of Educational Research, 83, 147–150.
66.
RasinskiT.V.PadakN.LinekW.SturtevantE. (1994). Effects of fluency development on urban second-grade readers. Journal of Educational Research, 87, 158–165.
67.
ReutzelD.R.HollingsworthP.M. (1993). Effects of fluency training on second graders' reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Research, 86, 325–331.
68.
RoseT.L.BeattieJ.R. (1986). Relative effects of teacher-directed and taped previewing on oral reading. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 193–199.
69.
SáenzL.M.FuchsL.S. (2002). Examining the reading difficulty of secondary students with learning disabilities: Expository versus narrative text. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 31–41.
70.
ShankweilerD. (1989). How problems of comprehension are related to difficulties in decoding. In ShankweilerD.LibermanI.Y. (Eds.), Phonology and reading disability: Solving the reading puzzle (pp. 35–67). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
71.
ShankweilerD. (1999). Words to meanings. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 113–127.
72.
ShankweilerD.LundquistE.KatzL.StuebingK.K.FletcherJ.M.BradyS.FowlerA.DreyerL.G.MarchioneK.E.ShaywitzS.E.ShaywitzB.A. (1999). Comprehension and decoding: Patterns of association in children with reading difficulties. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 69–94.
73.
ShareD.StanovichK. (1995). Cognitive processes in early reading development: Accommodating individual differences into a mode of acquisition. Issues in Education: Contributions from Educational Psychology, 1, 1–57.
74.
ShefelbineJ. (1990). A syllabic-unit approach to teaching decoding of polysyllabic words to fourth- and sixth-grade disabled readers. In ZutellJ.McCormickS. (Eds.), Literacy theory and research: Analysis from multiple paradigms (pp. 223–230). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
75.
ShefelbineJ.CalhounJ. (1991). Variability in approaches to identifying polysyllabic words: A descriptive study of sixth graders with highly, moderately, and poorly developed syllabication strategies. In ZutellJ.McCormickS. (Eds.), Learner factors/teacher factors: Issues in literacy research and instruction (pp. 169–177). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
76.
SimmonsD.C.FuchsL.S.FuchsD.MathesP.HodgeJ.P. (1995). Effects of explicit teaching and peer tutoring on the reading achievement of learning-disabled and low-performing students in regular classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 95, 387–408.
77.
SindelarP.T.MondaL.O'SheaL. (1990). Effects of repeated readings on instructional and mastery-level readers. Journal of Educational Research, 83, 353–363.
78.
SmithD.D. (1979). The improvement of children's oral reading through the use of teacher modeling. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 12, 172–175.
79.
SnowC.E.BurnsM.S.GriffinP. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
80.
StanovichK. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.
81.
StanovichK.E. (1996). Word recognition: Changing perspectives. In BarrR.KamilM.L.MosenthalP.B.PearsonP.D. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 418–452). New York: Longman.
82.
StanovichK.E. (1993). Does reading make you smarter? Literacy and the development of verbal intelligence. In ReeseH. (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 24, pp. 133–180). San Diego: Academic Press.
83.
StoutT.W. (1997). An investigation of the effects of a repeated reading intervention on the fluency and comprehension of students with language-learning disabilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University, Atlanta.
84.
StreckerS.K.RoserN.L.MartinezM.G. (1998). Toward understanding oral reading fluency. In ShanahanT.Rodriguez-BrownF. (Eds.) Forty-seventh yearbook of the national reading conference (pp. 295–310). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
85.
SwansonH.L. (1999). Instructional components that predict treatment outcomes for students with LD: Support for a combined strategy and direct instruction model. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14, 129–140.
86.
SwansonP.N.De La PazS. (1998). Teaching effective comprehension strategies to students with learning and reading disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 33, 209–218.
87.
VachonV.L. (1998). Effects of mastery of multisyllabic word reading component skills and of varying practice contexts on word and text reading skills of middle school students with reading deficiencies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene.
88.
VachonV.L.GleasonM.M. (2003). The effects of mastery teaching and varying practice contexts on middle school students' acquisition of multisyllabic word reading strategies. Manuscript in preparation.
89.
VaughnS.GerstenR.ChardD.J. (2000). The underlying message in LD intervention research: Findings from research syntheses. Exceptional Children, 67(1), 99–114.
90.
VaughnS.LevyS.ColemanM.BosC.S. (2002). Reading instruction for students with LD and EBD: A synthesis of observation studies. The Journal of Special Education, 36, 2–13.
91.
VitaleM.MedlandM.RomanceN.WeaverH.P. (1993). Accelerating reading and thinking skills of low-achieving elementary students: Implications for curricular change. Effective School Practices, 12(1), 26–31.
92.
WeinsteinG.CookeN.L. (1992). The effects of two repeated reading interventions on generalization of fluency. Learning Disability Quarterly, 15, 21–28.
93.
WilsonB.A. (1996). Wilson reading system. Millbury, MA: Wilson Language Training Corporation.
94.
WolfM.Katzir-CohenT. (2001). Reading fluency and its intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 211–238.
95.
WongB.Y.L. (1994). Instructional parameters promoting transfer of learned strategies in students with LD. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 229–236.
