Timely and Compelling Research for the Field of Learning Disabilities: Implications for the Future

Bryan T. (2003). The applicability of the risk and resilience model to the social problems of students with learning disabilities: Response to Bernice Wong. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 94–98.

Coburn C.E. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 3–12.

Cosden M. (2003). Response to Wong's paper. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 87–89.

Denton C.A. Foorman B.R. Mathes P.G. (2003).

Perspective: Schools that “beat the odds.” Remedial and Special Education, 24, 258–261.

Denton C.A. Vaughn S. Fletcher J.M. (2003). Bringing research-based practice in reading intervention to scale. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 201–211.

Deshler D.D. (2003). Intervention research and bridging the gap between research and practice. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 1(1), 1–7.

Donahue M.L. Pearl R. (2003). Studying social development and learning disabilities is not for the faint-hearted: Comments on the risk/resilience framework. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 90–93.

Fuchs D. Mock D. Morgan P.L. Young C.L. (2003). Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 157–171.

Gerber P. Ginsberg R. Reiff H.B. (1992). Identifying alterable patterns of vocational success in highly successful adults with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 475–487.

Gersten R. Jimenez R. (1998). Promoting learning for culturally and linguistically diverse students. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Goldenberg C.N. Gallimore R. (1991). Local knowledge, research knowledge, and educational change: A case study of early first-grade Spanish reading improvement. Educational Researcher, 20(8), 2–14.

Klingner J.K. Ahwee S. Pilonieta P. Menendez R. (2003).

Barriers and facilitators in scaling up research-based practices. Exceptional Children, 69, 411–429.

Little M.E. Houston D. (2003). Research into practice through professional development. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 75–87.

MacMillan D.L. Speece D.L. (1999). Utility of current diagnostic categories for research and practice. In Gallimore R. Bernheimer L.P. MacMillan D.L. Speece D.L. Vaughn S. (Ed.), Developmental perspectives on children with high-incidence disabilities (pp. 117–134). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Margalit M. (2003). Resilience models among individuals with learning disabilities (LD): Proximal and distal influences. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 82–86.

McNamara J. Wong B.Y.L. (2003). Memory for everyday information in students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 394–406.

Moody W.W. Vaughn S. Hughes M.T. Fischer M. (2000). Reading instruction in the resource room: Set up for failure. Exceptional Children, 66, 305–316.

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107–110.

Raskind M.H. Goldberg R.J. Higgins E.L. Herman K.L. (1999). Patterns of change and predictors of success in individuals with learning disabilities: Results from a twenty-year longitudinal study. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14, 35–49.

Robinson C.S. Menchetti B.M. Torgesen J.K. (2002). Toward a two-factor theory of one type of mathematics disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17, 81–89.

Shaywitz S.E. Shaywitz B.A. Fletcher J.M. Escobar M.D. (1990). Prevalence of reading disability in boys and girls: Results of the Connecticut Longitudinal Study. Journal of the American Medical Association, 24, 998–1002.

Speece D.L. Case L.P. (2001). Classification in context: An alternative approach to identifying early reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 735–749.

Speece D.L. Case L.P. Molloy D.E. (2003). Responsiveness to general education instruction as the first gate to learning disabilities identification. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 147–156.

Sun L. Bender W.N. Fore C. (2003). Web-based certification courses: The future of teacher preparation in special education? Teacher Education and Special Education, 26, 87–97.

Tiu R.D. Thompson L.A. Lewis B.A. (2003). The role of IQ in a component model of reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 424–437.

United States Department of Education. (2003). Improving teacher quality: Non-regulatory guidance ([revised draft issued September 12, 2003]). Washington, DC: Author.

United States Department of Education. (2004). Charting the course: States decide major provisions under No Child Left Behind. Retrieved January 20, 2004, from www.ed.gov/news/pressre-leases/2004/01/01142004.html

Vaughn S. Fuchs L.S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 137–146.

Vaughn S. Linan-Thompson S. Hickman P. (2003) Response to instruction as a means of identifying students with reading/learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69, 391–409.

Vaughn S. Linan-Thompson S. Kouzekanani K. Bryant D.P. Dickson S. Blozis S.A. (2003). Reading instruction grouping for students with reading difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 301–315.

Vaughn S. Moody S.W. Schumm J.S. (1998). Broken promises: Reading instruction in the resource room. Exceptional Children, 64, 211–225.

Werner E.E. (1993). Risk and resilience in individuals with learning disabilities: Lessons learned from the Kauai longitudinal study. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 8, 28–35.

Wiener J. (2003). Resilience and multiple risks: A response to Bernice Wong. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 77–81.

Wong B.Y.L. (2003). General and specific issues for researchers' consideration in applying the risk and resilience framework to the social domain of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 68–76.

Ysseldyke J.E. Algozzine B. Epps S. (1983). A logical and empirical analysis of current practice in classifying students as handicapped. Exceptional Children, 50, 160–166.