Given that affective and cognitive processes interact in writing, it is important that interventions for developing writing ability focus both on strategies for developing motivation and cognitive processes. This article provides evidence for the efficacy of an instructional program that combines training in composition processes with strategies for developing motivation to achieve. Motivational training focused on multiple attributes: value and functional character, standards of performance, expectations, beliefs, self-efficacy, self-esteem and writing-related factors. Sixty-six fifth- and six-grade students with learning disabilities were assessed on a series of measures prior to and following the motivational intervention. Compared with a control group (n=61), trained students showed significant improvements in the quality of their writing (measured in terms of text structure and coherence) and in their attitudes towards writing. They did not, however, show significant changes in productivity (quantity of text produced), self-esteem, beliefs and expectations, or in writing- related attributions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlamargotD.ChanquoyL. (2001). Through the models of writing. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
2.
AlonsoJ. (1997). Cómo motivar: Condicionantes contextuales de la motivación [How to motivate. Contextual determinants of motivation]. In J. Alonso, Motivar para el aprendizaje: Teoría y estrategias (pp. 55–112) [Motivating to learn: Theory and strategies]. Barcelona: EDEBÉ.
3.
Anderson-InmanL. (1999). Computer-based solutions for secondary students with learning disabilities: Emerging issues. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 15, 239–249.
4.
BerningerV.W. (1999). Coordinating transcription and text generation in working memory during composing: Automatic and constructive processes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22(2), 99–112.
5.
BerningerV.W.StageS.A.SmithD.R.HildebrandA.D. (2001). Assessment for reading and writing intervention: A three-tier model for prevention and remediation. In AndrewsJ.J.W.SaklofskeD.H.JanzenH.L. (Eds.), Handbook of psychoeducational assessment, ability, achievement and behavior in children (pp. 195–223). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.)
6.
BrodyN.EhrlichmanH. (1997). Personality psychology: The science of individuality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall [Motivos y Metas [Motives and goals]. In BrodyN.EhrlichmanH. (Eds.), Psicología de la Personalidad (pp. 171–219) [Psychology of personality]. Madrid: PRENTICE].)
7.
BrooksA.VaughanK.BerningerV. (1999). Tutorial interventions for writing disabilities: comparison of transcription and text generation processes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22 (3), 183–191.
ButlerK.G.SillimanE.R. (Eds.). (2002). Speaking, reading, and writing in children with language learning disabilities. New paradigms in research and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.)
10.
ButterfieldE.C.CarlsonJ.S. (Series Editor). (1994). Children's writing: Towards a process theory of the development of skilled writing. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press Inc.)
11.
ChurchM.A.ElliotA.J.GableS.L. (2001). Perceptions of classroom environment, achievement goals and achievement outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93 (1), 43–54.
12.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13.
CuetosF. (1991). Psicología de la escritura [The Psychology of writing]. Madrid: Escuela Española.
14.
de VegaM.DíazJ.M.LeónI. (1999): Procesamiento del discurso [Discourse processing]. In De VegaM.CuetosF. (Eds.), Psicolingüística del español (pp. 271–305) [Psycholinguistics of Spanish]. Madrid: Trotta.)
15.
ElbowP. (1998). Writing without teachers. New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
ElbowP. (2000). Everyone can write. Essays toward a hopeful theory of writing and teaching writing. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
FavartM.PasseraultJ.M. (1996). Functionality of cohesion devices in the management of local and global coherence: Two studies in children's written production of narratives. In RijlaarsdamG.van den BerghH.CouzijnM. (Eds.), Theories, models and methodology in writing research, (pp. 394–365) Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.)
18.
GarcíaJ.N. (2000a). Estrategias de intervención en los procesos de planificación de la escritura en alumnos con dificultades de aprendizaje [Strategies of intervention in planning writing proceses with learning diabilities students]. In GarcíaJ.N. (Ed.), De la psicología de la instrucción a las necesidades curriculares (pp. 261–282) [From the psychology of instruction to the curricular needs]. Barcelona: Oikos-Tau.)
19.
GarcíaJ.N. (2000b). Planificación y variables metacognitivas en la instrucción estratégica de la escritura a través del currículum en alumnos con y sin dificultades de aprendizaje [Planning and metacognitive variables in writing strategic instruction through the currículo in students with and without learning disabilities]. Valladolid: CEC de la JCyL y FSE 2000 (Memoria final [Final report]).
20.
GarcíaJ.N. (2002). El enfoque de la psicología de la escritura como marco para la evaluación e intervención en la composición escrita [The approach of the psychology of writing as a frame to the assessment and the intervention in the writing composition]. Bordón. Revista de Pedagogía. 54 (1), 53–67.
21.
GarcíaJ.N.de CasoA.M. (2002a). Evaluación e intervención en la motivación hacia la escritura en alumnos con dificultad de aprendizaje [Assessment and intervention in the motivation towards writing in students with learning disabilities]. In GarcíaJ.N. (Ed.), Aplicaciones de intervención psicopedagógica (pp. 135–143) [Applications of psychopedagogic intervention]. Madrid: Pirámide.)
22.
GarcíaJ.N.de CasoA.M. (2002b). ¿Es posible mejorar la composición en alumnos con DA y/o BR sin que cambie la reflexiva hacia la escritura? [Is it possible to improve writing composition in learning disabilities and/or low achievement students without changes in reflexivity towards writing?]Psicothema, 14(2), 456–462.
23.
GarcíaJ.N.MarbánJ.M. (2003). El Proceso de composición escrita en alumnos con DA y/o BR: estudio instruccional con énfasis en la planificación [The process of writing composition in students with LD and/or LA: an instructional research with enphasis in the planning]. Infancia y Aprendizaje. Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 26 (1), 97–113.
24.
GarcíaJ.N.MarbánJ.M.de CasoA.M. (2001). Evaluación colectiva de los procesos de planificación y factores psicológicos en la escritura (EPPyFPE) [Collective assessment of the planning proceses and other psychological factors of the writing]. In J. N. García, Dificultades de aprendizaje e intervención psicopedagógica (pp. 151–155) [Learning disabilities and psychopedagogic intervention]. Barcelona: Ariel.
25.
GarcíaJ.N.MarbánJ.M.de CasoA.M.FidalgoR. (2001). Niveles de desarrollo de la escritura, dificultades de aprendizaje y variables moduladoras: aportaciones de una línea de investigación [Levels of writing developmental, learning disabilities and modulator variables: contributions of a research line]. In MirandaA. (Ed.), Actas del Primer Congreso Internacional de Déficit de Atención y Dificultades de Aprendizaje (pp. 217–230) [Proceedings of the first international congress of atentional deficits and learning disabilities]. Málaga: Aljibe.)
González-PiendaJ.A.NúñezJ.C.González-PumariegaS.ÁlvarezL.RocesC.GarcíaM.GozálezP.CabanachR.G.ValleA. (2000): Autoconcepto, proceso de atribución causal y metas académicas en niños con y sin dificultades de aprendizaje [Self-concept, causal attributional proces and academic goals in children with and without learning disabilities]. Psicothema, 12(4), 548–556.
28.
GottfriedA.E.FlemingJ.S.GottfriedA.W. (2001). Continuity of academic Iintrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93 (1), 3–13.
29.
GrahamS. (1999a). The role of text production skills in writing development: A special issue - I. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 78–98.
30.
GrahamS. (1999b). Handwriting and spelling instruction for students with learning disabilities: A review. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 75–77.
31.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R. (1999). Assessment and intervention in overcoming writing difficulties: An illustration from the self-regulated strategy development model. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 30, 255–264.
32.
GrahamS.HarrisK.R. (2002). The road less traveled: Prevention and intervention in written language. In ButlerK.G.SillimanE.R. (Eds), Speaking, reading, and writing in children with language learning disabilities. New paradigms in research and practice (pp. 199–217). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.)
33.
GrahamS.HarrisK.R.LarsenL. (2001). Prevention and Intervention of Writing Difficulties for Students with Learning Disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16 (2), 74–84.
34.
GreggN.MatherN. (2002). School is fun at recess: Informal analyses of written language for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilitites, 35 (1), 7–22.
35.
HallC.W.SpruillK.L.WebsterR.E. (2002). Motivational and attitudinal factors in college students with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25, 79–86.
36.
HayesJ.R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In LevyC.M.RansdellS. (Eds.), The science of writing, theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 1–27). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.)
37.
HayesJ.NashJ.G. (1996). On the nature of planning in writing. In LevyM.RansdellS. (Eds.), The science of writing, theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 29–55). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.)
38.
JusticiaF. (1995). El desarrollo del vocabulario. Diccionario de frecuencias [The development of vocabulary. Dictionary of frequencies]. Granada: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Granada.
39.
KelloggR.T. (1994). The psychology of writing. New York: Oxford University Press.
40.
KelloggR.T. (1996). A model of working memory in writing. In LevyC.M.RansdellS. (Eds), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 57–71). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.)
41.
KlassenR. (2002a). Writing in early adolescence: A review of the role of self-efficacy beliefs. Educational Psychology Review, 14(2), 173–203.
42.
KuhlJ. (2000). A functional-design approach to motivation and self-regulation. The dynamics of personality systems interactions. In BoekaertsM.PintrichP.R.ZeidnerM. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 111–167). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.)
43.
LinnenbrinkE.A.PintrichP.R. (2002). Motivation as an enabler for academic success. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 313–328.
44.
MatherN.RobertsR. (1995). Informal assessment and instruction in written language. A practitioner's guide for students with learning disabilities. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
45.
MayerR.E. (2001). Cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational aspects of problem solving. In HartmanH.J. (Ed.), Metacognition in learning and instruction: Theory, research and practice(pp. 89–101). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.)
46.
McArthurC.A. (1999). Word prediction for students with severe spelling problems. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22(3), 158–172.
47.
McGregorH.A.ElliotA.J. (2002). Achievement goals as predictors of achievement-relevant processes prior to task engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 381–395.
MussenP.H.CongerJ.J.KaganJ.HustonA.C. (1990). Intelligence and achievement. In MussenP.CongerJ.KaganJ.HustonA.Child development and personality (7th ed., pp. 325–378). New York: Harper & Row Publishers.
50.
NewbyT.J. (1991). Classroom motivation: Strategies of first-year teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 195–200.
51.
PatrickH.RyanA.M.PintrichP.R. (1999). The differential impact of extrinsic and mastery goal orientations on males and females self-regulated learning. Learning & Individual Differences, 11 (2), 153–171.
52.
PintrichP.R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In BoekaertsM.PintrichP.R.ZeidnerM. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.)
53.
PintrichP.R.AndermanE.M. (1994). Intraindividual differences in motivation and cognition in students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(6), 360–371.
54.
ReynoldsP.L.SymonsS. (2001). Motivational variables and children's text search. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93 (1), 14–22.
55.
RijlaarsdamG.van den BerghH.CouzijnM. (Eds.). (1996a). Theories, models and methodology in writing research. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.)
56.
RijlaarsdamG.van den BerghH.CouzijnM. (Eds.). (1996b). Effective teaching and learning of writing. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.)
57.
SánchezE. (1998). Comprensión y redacción de textos [Comprehension and composition of texts]. Barcelona: Edebé.
58.
SandersT.JanssenD.van der PoolE.SchilperoordJ.van WijkC. (1996). Hierarchical text structure in writing products and writing processes. In RijlaarsdamG.van den BerghH.CouzijnM. (Eds.), Theories, models and methodology in writing research (pp. 473–492). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.)
59.
SorensonS. (1997): Students' writing handbook (2nd ed.). New York: MacMillan.
60.
TabassamW.GraingerJ. (2002). Self-concept, attributional style and self-efficacy beliefs of students with learning disabilities with and without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25, 141–151.
61.
TorranceM.GalbraithD. (Eds.). (1999). Knowing what to write. Conceptual processes in text production (pp. 121–138). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.)
62.
ValleA.NúñezJ.C.RodríguezS.González-PumariegaS. (2002). La motivación académica [Achademic motivation]. In González-PiendaJ.A.González-CabanachR.NúñezJ.C.ValleA. (Eds.), Manual de psicología de la educacíon (pp. 117–144) [Handbook of psychology of education]. Madrid: Pirámide.)
63.
WoltersC.A.PintrichP.R. (2001). Contextual differences in student motivation and self-regulated learning in mathematics, English and social studies classrooms. In HartmanH.J. (Ed.), Metacognition in learning and instruction: Theory, research and practice (pp.103–124). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.)
64.
WongB. (1996). Assessment and instruction of writing skills. In B.Y.L. Wong, The ABCs of Learning Disabilities (pp. 195–215). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
65.
WongB. (1997). Research on genre-specific strategies for enhancing writing in adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20(2), 140–159.
66.
WongB. (1998). Reflections on current attainments and future directions in writing intervention research in learning disabilities. In ScruggsT.E.MartropieriM.A. (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (pp. 127–149). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press Inc.)
67.
WongB. (2000). Writing strategies instruction for expository essays for adolescents with and without learning disabilities. Topics in Language Disorders, 20(4), 29–44.
68.
WongB.ButlerD.FiczereS.KuperisS. (1996). Teaching students with learning disabilities and low achievers to plan, write and revise opinion essays. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29(2), 197–212.
69.
WongB.ButlerD.FiczereS.KuperisS. (1997). Teaching adolescents with learning disabilities and low achievers to plan, write and revise compare and contrast essays. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 12(1), 2–15.
