This paper examines how a producer's status in the market influences its choices about product quality, and the outcomes that result. We compare economic models of reputation that emphasize the role of past quality as a source of information about current quality with sociological models of status that emphasize the role of affiliations. We test hypotheses about the complementary effects of status and reputation in an analysis of more than 10,000 affiliation decisions made by 595 wineries over a 10-year period. Results show that actors occupying high-status positions obtain greater benefit from subsequent high-status affiliations than do actors occupying low-status positions. As such, these actors are more willing and able to pay for subsequent high-status affiliations and to use them to advance their position in the larger status ordering.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenFranklin1984“Reputation and product quality.”Rand Journal of Economics, 15: 311–327.
2.
AmerineMaynard A.1984“Sensory evaluation or how to taste wine.” In MuscatineD.AmerineM. A.ThompsonB. (eds.), The Book of California Wine: 448–452. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
3.
AschSolomon E.1940“Studies in the principles of judgments and attitudes II: Determination of judgments by group and by ego standards.”Journal of Social Psychology, 12: 433–465.
4.
BaumJoel A. C.OliverChristine1991“Institutional linkages and organizational mortality.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 187–218.
5.
BelsleyDavid A.KuhEdwinWelschRoy E.1980Regression Diagnostics. New York: Wiley.
6.
BonacichPhillip1987“Power and centrality: A family of measures.”American Journal of Sociology, 92: 1170–1182.
7.
BowlesSamuelGintisHerbert1976Schooling in Capitalist America: Educational Reform and the Contradictions of Economic Life. New York: Basic Books.
8.
BurtRonald1980“Autonomy in a social topology.”American Journal of Sociology, 85: 892–925.
9.
1992Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
CamicCharles1992“Reputation and predecessor selection: Parsons and the institutionalists.”American Sociological Review, 57: 421–445.
11.
CohenMichael D.MarchJames G.OlsenJohan P.1972“A garbage can model of organizational choice.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 17: 1–25.
12.
DavisGerald1991“Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 583–613.
13.
EliasNorbertScotsonJ. L.1965The Established and the Outsiders: A Sociological Inquiry into Community Problems. London: Frank Cass.
14.
FernandezRobertoWeinbergNancy1997“Sifting and sorting: Personal contacts and hiring in a retail bank.”American Sociological Review, 62: 883–903.
15.
FigielRichard1991“Is there gout de terroir out there? Findings of the First Annual Grand Harvest Awards: Charting the sensory landscape of America's viticultural areas.”Vineyard and Winery Management March-April: 32–34.
16.
GranovetterMark S.1974Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
1985“Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness.”American Journal of Sociology, 91: 481–510.
18.
GranovetterMark S.SwedbergRichard1992The Sociology of Economic Life. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
19.
HanShin-Kap1994“Mimetic isomorphism and its effect on the audit services market.”Social Forces, 73: 637–664.
20.
HaunschildPamela1994“How much is that company worth? Interorganizational relationships, uncertainty, and acquisition premiums.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 391–411.
21.
HovlandCarl I.JanisIrving L.KelleyHarold1953Communication and Persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
KollockPeter1994“The emergence of exchange structures: An experimental study of uncertainty, commitment, and trust.”American Journal of Sociology, 100: 313–345.
24.
KramerMatt1992Making Sense of California Wine. New York: Morrow.
25.
LatourBruno1987Science in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
LewinKurt1935Dynamic Theory of Personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.
27.
ManfredaJohnMendelsonRichard1988“U.S. wine law.” Unpublished manuscript, Sonoma County Wine Library, Healdsburg, CA.
28.
MoultonKirby1984“The economics of wine in California.” In MuscatineD.AmerineM. A.ThompsonB. (eds.), The Book of California Wine: 380–405. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
29.
PerrowCharles1961“Organizational prestige: Some functions and dysfunctions.”American Journal of Sociology, 66: 335–341.
30.
PfefferJeffreySalancikGerald R.1978The External Control of Organizations. New York: Harper and Row.
31.
PodolnyJoel M.1993“A status-based model of market competition.”American Journal of Sociology, 98: 829–872.
32.
1994“Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 458–483.
33.
PodolnyJoel M.PhillipsDamon1996“The dynamics of organizational status.”Journal of Industrial and Corporate Change, 5: 453–472.
34.
PodolnyJoel M.StuartToby E.1995“A role-based ecology of technological change.”American Journal of Sociology, 100: 1224–1260.
35.
PodolnyJoelStuartToby E.HannanMichael T.1996“Networks, knowledge, and niches: A sociological examination of worldwide competition in the semiconductor industry.”American Journal of Sociology, 102: 659–689.
36.
RaubWernerWeesieJeroen1990“Reputation and efficiency in social interactions: An example of network effects.”American Journal of Sociology, 96: 626–654.
37.
RossLeeNisbettRichard E.1991The Person and Situation: Perspectives of Social Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
38.
ShapiroCarl1983“Premiums for high quality products as returns to reputations.”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98: 659–680.
39.
StuartToby E.HoangHaHybelsRalph C.1999“Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 315–349.
40.
StullerJayMartinGlen1989Through the Grapevine: The Great Story Behind America's Eight Billion Dollar Wine Industry. New York: Wynwood Press.
41.
ThompsonBob1984“The critics look at California wines.” In MuscatineD.AmerineM. A.ThompsonB. (eds.), The Book of California Wine: 468–536. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
42.
ValetteJean-Michel1992Scanning the Trends in the Wine Industry. San Francisco: Hambrecht & Quist.
43.
VeblenThorstein1994The Theory of the Leisure Class. (Originally published in 1899.) New York: Dover.
44.
WiewelWimHunterAlbert1985“The interorganizational network as a resource: A comparative study of organizational genesis.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 30: 482–496.
45.
WilsonRobert1985“Reputations in games and markets.” In RothAlvin (ed.), Game Theoretic Models of Bargaining: 27–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
