This paper investigates the relationship between organizational aging and innovation processes to illuminate the dynamics of high-technology industries, as well to resolve debates in organizational theory about the effects of aging on organizational functioning. We test hypotheses based on two seemingly contradictory consequences of aging for organizational innovation: that aging is associated with increases in firms' rates of innovation and that the difficulties of keeping pace with incessant external developments causes firms' innovative outputs to become obsolete relative to the most current environmental demands. These seemingly contradictory outcomes are intimately related and reflect inherent tradeoffs in organizational learning and innovation processes. Multiple longitudinal analyses of the relationship between firm age and patenting behavior in the semiconductor and biotechnology industries lend support to these arguments.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbernathyW. J.1978The Productivity Dilemma. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
2.
AbernathyW. J.UtterbackJ. M.1978“Patterns of industrial innovation.”Technology Review, June/July: 41–47.
3.
AlbertM. D.AveryD.NarinF.McAllisterP.1991“Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents.”Research Policy, 20: 251–259.
4.
AldrichH.AusterE. R.1986“Even dwarfs started small: Liabilities of age and size and their strategic implications.” In StawB. M.CummingsL. L. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 8: 165–198. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
5.
AmburgeyT. L.KellyD.BarnettW. P.1993“Resetting the clock: The dynamics of organizational change and failure.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 51–74.
6.
BarleyS. R.FreemanJ.HybelsR. C.1992“Strategic alliances in commercial biotechnology” In NohriaN.EcclesR. (eds.), Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action: 311–347. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
7.
BarnettW. P.1990“The organizational ecology of a technological system.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 31–60.
BarronD. N.WestE.HannanM. T.1994“A time to grow and a time to die: Growth and mortality of credit unions in New York City, 1914–1990.”American Journal of Sociology, 100: 381–421.
BlauP. M.SchoenherrR. A.1971The Structure of Organizations. New York: Basic Books.
12.
BlossfeldH.-P.RohwerG.1995Techniques of Event History Modeling: New Approaches to Causal Analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13.
BurgelmanR. A.1983“A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 28: 223–244.
14.
1994“Fading memories: A process theory of strategic business exit in dynamic environments.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 24–56.
15.
CarrollG. R.1983“A stochastic model of organizational mortality: Review and reanalysis.”Social Science Research, 12: 303–329.
16.
ClarkK. B.1985“The interaction of design hierarchies and market concepts in technological evolution.”Research Policy, 14: 235–251.
17.
CohenW. M.KlepperS.1996“Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: The case of process and product R&D.”Review of Economics and Statistics, 78: 223–243.
18.
CohenW. M.LevinR. C.1989“Empirical studies of innovation and market structure.” In SchmalenseeR.WilligR. D. (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, 3: 1060–1107. New York: Elsevier Science.
19.
CohenW. M.LevinR. C.MowreyD. C.1987“Firm size and R&D intensity: A re-examination.”Journal of Industrial Economics, 35: 543–565.
20.
CohenW. M.LevinthalD. A.1989“Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D.”Economic Journal, 99: 569–596.
21.
1990“Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128–152.
22.
CoxD. R.1972“Regression models and life-tables (with discussion).”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 34: 187–220.
23.
CyertR. M.MarchJ. G.1963A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
24.
DelacroixJ.SwaminathanA.1991“Cosmetic, speculative, and adaptive organizational change in the wine industry: A longitudinal study.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 631–662.
25.
DosiG.1982“Technological paradigms and technological trajectories.”Research Policy, 11: 147–162.
26.
HannanM. T.1998“Rethinking age dependence in organizational mortality: Logical formalizations.”American Journal of Sociology, 104: 126–164.
27.
HannanM. T.BurtonM. D.BaronJ. N.1996“Inertia and change in the early years: Employment relations in young, high-technology firms.”Industrial and Corporate Change, 5: 503–536.
28.
HannanM. T.CarrollG. R.DobrevS.HanJ.1998“Organizational mortality in European and American automobile industries part I: Revisiting the effects of age and size.”European Sociological Review, 14: 279–302.
29.
HannanM. T.FreemanJ.1984“Structural inertia and organizational change.”American Journal of Sociology, 49: 149–164.
30.
HausmanJ.HallB. H.GrilichesZ.1984“Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship.”Econometrica, 52: 909–938.
31.
HeckmanJ. J.1976“The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models.”Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5: 475–492.
32.
HeckmanJ. J.BorjasG.1980“Does unemployment cause future unemployment? Definitions, questions and answers from a continuous time model of heterogeneity and state dependence.”Economica, 47: 247–283.
33.
HendersonR. M.1993“Underinvestment and incompetence as responses to radical innovation: Evidence from the photolithographic alignment equipment industry.”RAND Journal of Economics, 24: 248–270.
34.
HendersonR. M.ClarkK. B.1990“Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technology and the failure of established firms.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 9–31.
35.
HiltzikM.1999Dealers of Lightning: Xerox PARC and the Dawn of the Computer Age. New York: Harper Business.
36.
JaffeA.TrajtenbergM.HendersonR.1993“Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers, as evidenced by patent citations.”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108: 577–598.
37.
KenneyM.1986Bio-technology: The University-Industrial Complex. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
38.
KingG.1989Unifying Political Methodology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
39.
LeeL.-F.1983“Generalized econometric models with selectivity.”Econometrica, 51: 507–512.
40.
LevinR. C.KlevorickA. K.NelsonR. R.WinterS. G.1987“Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development.”Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 3: 783–820.
LinD. Y.WeiL. J.1989“The robust inference for the Cox proportional hazards model.”Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84: 1047–1078.
43.
MarchJ. G.1988Decisions in Organizations. New York: Blackwell.
44.
1991“Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning.”Organization Science, 2: 71–87.
45.
NelsonR. R.WinterS. G.1982An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University.
46.
PetersenT.1995“Analysis of event histories.” In ArmingerG.CloggC. C.SobelM. E. (eds.), Handbook of Statistical Modeling for the Social and Behavioral Sciences: 453–517. New York: Plenum.
47.
PfefferJ.1981Power in Organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
48.
PodolnyJ. M.StuartT. E.1995“A role-based ecology of technological change.”American Journal of Sociology, 100: 1224–1260.
49.
PowellW. W.KoputK. W.Smith-DoerrL.1996“Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 116–145.
50.
Ranger-MooreJ.1997“Bigger may be better, but is older wiser? Organizational age and size in the New York life insurance industry.”American Sociological Review, 62: 903–921.
51.
RosenbloomR. S.ChristensenC. M.1994“Technological discontinuities, organizational capabilities, and strategic commitments.”Industrial and Corporate Change, 3: 655–685.
52.
SchumpeterJ. A.1942Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper.
53.
SørensenJ. B.1999“Executive migration and interorganizational competition.”Social Science Research, 28: 289–315.
54.
StinchcombeA. L.1965“Social structure and organizations.” In MarchJ. G. (ed.), Handbook of Organizations: 142–193. Chicago: Rand McNally.
55.
StuartT. E.PodolnyJ. M.1996“Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities.”Strategic Management Journal, 17: 21–38.
56.
TiltonJ. E.1971International Diffusion of Technology: The Case of Semiconductors. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
57.
TrajtenbergM.1990“A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of information.”RAND Journal of Economics, 21: 172–187.
58.
TumaN. B.HannanM. T.1984Social Dynamics: Models and Methods. San Francisco: Academic Press.
59.
TushmanM. L.AndersonP.1986“Technological discontinuities and organizational environments.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 31: 439–465.
60.
TushmanM. L.RosenkopfL.1992“Organizational determinants of technological change: Toward a sociology of technological evolution.” In StawB. M.CummingsL. L. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 14: 311–347. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
61.
WadeJ.1995“Dynamics of organizational communities and technological bandwagons: An empirical investigation of community evolution in the microprocessor market.”Strategic Management Journal, 16: 111–133.
62.
WilsonR. W.AshtonP. K.EganT. P.1980Innovation, Competition and Government Policy in the Semiconductor Industry. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
