Attempts to evaluate the cognitive-motivational profiles of students with reading comprehension difficulties have been scarce. The purpose of the present study was twofold: (a) to assess the discriminatory validity of cognitive, motivational, affective, and psychopathological variables for identification of students with reading difficulties, and (b) to profile students with and without reading comprehension difficulties across those variables. Participants were 87 students who scored more than 1.3 SD below the mean on a standardized reading comprehension battery and 500 typical students in grades 2 through 4. Results using linear discriminant analyses indicated that students with reading comprehension difficulties could be accurately predicted by low cognitive skills and high competitiveness. Using cluster analysis, students with significant deficits in reading comprehension were mostly assigned to a low skill/low motivation group (termed helpless) or a low skill/high motivation group (termed motivated low achievers). Based on these findings, it was concluded that motivation, emotions, and psychopathology play a pivotal role in explaining the achievement tendencies of students with reading comprehension difficulties.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdelmanH.S. (1979. Diagnostic classification of LD: A practical necessity and a procedural problem. Learning Disability Quarterly, 2, 55–62.
2.
AmesC. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271.
3.
BayM.BryanT.H. (1991). Teachers' reports of their thinking about at-risk learners and others. Exceptionality, 2, 127–139.
4.
BearG.G.MinkeK.M. (1996). Positive bias in maintenance of self-worth among children with LD. Learning Disability Quarterly, 19, 23–32.
5.
BoneP.F.SharmaS.ShimpT.A. (1989). A bootsrap procedure for evaluating the goodness-of-fit indices of structural equation and confirmatory factor models. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 105–111.
6.
BotsasG.PadeliaduS. (2003). Goal orientation and reading comprehension strategy use among students with and without reading difficulties. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 477–495.
7.
BouffardT.CoutureN. (2003). Motivational profile and academic achievement among students enrolled in different schooling tracks. Educational Studies, 29, 19–38.
8.
BreenM.J.BarkleyR.A. (1984). Psychological adjustment in learning disabled, hyperactive, and hyperactive/learning disabled children as measured by the personality inventory for children. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 13, 232–236.
9.
BrophyJ. (2005). Goal theorists should move on from performance goals. Educational Psychologist, 40, 167–176.
10.
BrownA.L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141–178.
11.
BryanT.BursteinK.ErgulC. (2004). The social-emotional side of learning disabilities: A science based presentation of the state of the art. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27, 45–52.
12.
CainK.OakhillJ.BryantP. (2004). Children's reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 31–42.
13.
CalfeeR. (1994). Critical literacy: Reading and writing for a new millennium. In EllsworthN.J.HedleyC.N.BarattaA.N. (Eds.), Literacy: A redefinition (pp. 19–39). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.)
14.
CleverA.BaerG.G.JuvonenJ. (1992). Discrepancies between competence and importance in self-perceptions of children in integrated classrooms. Journal of Special Education, 26, 125–138.
15.
CohenJ. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.
16.
De HouwerJ.HermansD. (Eds.). (2001). Automatic Affective Processing. New York: Psychology Press.)
17.
DunnL.M.DunnL.M. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service
18.
DweckC.S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048.
19.
DweckC.S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 5–12.
20.
DweckC.S.LeggettE.L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273.
21.
EfronB. (1987). Better bootstrap confidence intervals. Journal of the American Statistical Society, 82, 171–185.
22.
ElliotA.J.HarackiewiczJ.M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 461–475.
23.
FletcherJ.M.FrancisD.ShaywitzB.FoormanB.ShaywitzS. (1998). Intelligent testing and the discrepancy model for children with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13, 186–203.
24.
FletcherJ.M.ShaywitzS.E.ShankweilerD.P.KatzL.LibermanI.Y.StuebingK.K.FrancisD.J.FowlerA.E.ShaywitzB.A. (1994). Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 6–23.
25.
ForgasJ.P. (1991). Affect and social judgments: An introductory review. In ForgasJ.P. (Ed.), Emotion and social judgments (pp. 3–30). Tarrytown, NY: Pergamon.)
26.
FornessS.R.KeoghB.K.MacMillanD.L.KavaleK.GreshamF.M. (1998). What is so special about IQ? The limited explanatory power of cognitive abilities in the real world of special education. Remedial and Special Education, 19, 315–322.
27.
FrancisD.FletcherJ.StuebingK.LyonR.ShaywitzB.ShaywitzS. (2005). Psychometric approaches to the identification of LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 98–108.
28.
FuchsD.FuchsL.S.MathesP.G.LipseyM.W.RobertsP.H. (2001). Is “learning disabilities” just a fancy term for low achievement?: A meta-analysis of reading differences between low achievers with and without the label. Washington, DC: Learning Disabilities Summit, U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs.
29.
FulkB.M.BrighamF.J.LohmanD.A. (1998). Motivation and self-regulation: A comparison of students with learning and behavior problems. Remedial and Special Education, 19, 300–309.
30.
GarciaJ.N.de CasoA.M.(in press). Changes in writing selfefficacy and writing products and processes through specific training in self-efficacy beliefs of the learning disabled. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal.
31.
GeorgasD.D.ParaskevopoulosI.N.BezevegisI.G.GiannitsasN.D. (1997). Elliniko WISC-III: Wechsler klimakes noimosinis gia paidia [Greek WISC-III: Wechsler intelligence scales for children]. Athens: Ellinika Grammata.
32.
GreenwayP.MilneL. (1999). Relationship between psychopathology, learning disabilities, or both and WISC-III subtest scatter in adolescents. Psychology in the Schools, 36, 103–108.
33.
GreshamF.M. (2002). Responsiveness to intervention: An alternative approach to the identification of learning disabilities. In BradleyR.DanielsonL.HallahanD.P. (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Response to intervention (pp. 467–519). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.)
34.
GriloC.M.BeckerD.F.AnezL.M.McGlashanT.H. (2004). Diagnostic efficiency of DSM-IV criteria for borderline personality disorder: An evaluation in Hispanic men and women with substance use disorders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 126–131.
35.
GuthrieJ.T.AlaoS. (1997). Designing contexts to increase motivations for reading. Educational Psychologist, 32, 95–105.
36.
GuthrieJ.T.CoxK.E. (2001). Classroom conditions for motivation and engagement in reading. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 283–301.
37.
GuthrieJ.T.WigfieldA. (1999). How motivation fits into a science of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 199–205.
38.
HanleyJ.A.McNeilB.J. (1982). The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology, 143, 39–46.
39.
HanleyJ.A.McNeilB.J. (1983). A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology, 148, 839–843.
40.
HarackiewiczJ.M.BarronK.E.PintrichP.R.ElliotA.J.ThrashT.M. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 638–645.
41.
HarlowL. (2005). The essence of multivariate thinking: Basic themes and methods. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42.
HeathN.L.RossS. (2000). Prevalence and expression of depressive symptomatology in students with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 23, 24–36.
43.
HsuL.M. (2002). Diagnostic validity statistics and the MCMI-III. Psychological Assessment, 14, 410–422.
44.
KaplanA.MidgleyC. (2000). The relationship between perceptions of the classroom goal structure and early adolescents' affect in school: The mediating role of coping strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 11, 187–212.
45.
KarabenickS.A. (2004). Perceived achievement goal structure and college student help seeking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 569–581.
46.
KavaleK.A. (2001). Discrepancy models in the identification of learning disability. Washington, DC: Learning Disabilities Summit, U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs.
47.
KistnerJ.A.HaskettM.WhiteK.RobbinsF. (1987). Perceived competence and self-worth of learning disabled and normally achieving students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 37–44.
48.
KlineR.B.LacharD.BoersmaD.C. (1993). Identification of special education needs with the personality inventory for children (PIC): A hierarchical classification model. Psychological Assessment, 5, 307–316.
LelandC.H.HarsteJ.C. (1994). Multiple ways of knowing: Currículum in a new way. Language Arts, 71, 337–345.
51.
LepolaJ. (2004). The role of gender and reading competence in the development of motivational orientations from kindergarten to grade 1. Early Education and Development, 15, 217–242.
52.
LepolaJ.SalonenP.VaurasM. (2000). The development of motivational orientations as a function of divergent reading careers from pre-school to the second grade. Learning and Instruction, 10, 153–177.
53.
LepolaJ.SalonenP.VaurasM.PoskipartaE. (2004). Understanding the development of subnormal performance in children from a motivational-interactionist perspective. International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, 28, 145–189.
54.
LepperM.R.HodellM. (1989). Intrinsic motivation in the classroom. In AmesC.AmesR. (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Vol. 3 Goals and cognitions (pp. 73–105). New York: Academic Press.)
55.
LinnenbrinkE.A. (2005). The dilemma of performance-approach goals: The use of multiple goal contexts to promote students' motivation and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 197–213.
56.
LufiD.DarliukL.(in press). The interactive effect of test anxiety and learning disabilities among adolescentsInternational Journal of Educational Research.
57.
LufiL.OkashaS.CohenA. (2004). Test anxiety and its effect on the personality of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27, 176–184.
58.
LyonG.R.FletcherJ.M.BarnesM.C. (2002). Learning disabilities. In MashE.J.BarkleyR. (Eds.), Child psychopathology (2nd ed., pp. 520–586). New York: Guilford.)
59.
MaagJ.W.ReidR. (2006). Depression among students with learning disabilities: Assessing the risk. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 3–10.
60.
MacMillanD.L.FornessS.R. (1998). The role of IQ in special education placement decisions: Primary and determinative or peripheral and inconsequential?Remedial and Special Education, 19, 239–253.
61.
MacMillanD.L.SipersteinG.N. (2001). Learning disabilities as operationally defined by schools. Washington, DC: Learning Disabilities Summit, U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs.
62.
ManassisK.YoungA. (2000). Perceptions of emotions in anxious and learning disabled children. Depression and Anxiety, 12, 209–216.
63.
MargalitM. (2003). Resilience model among individuals with learning disabilities: Proximal and distal influences. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 82–86.
64.
MargalitM.ZakI. (1984). Anxiety and self-concept of learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 537–539.
65.
MarksS.DunnO.J. (1974). Discriminant functions when covariance matrices are unequal. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69, 555–559.
66.
MartinezR.S.Semrud-ClikemanM. (2004). Emotional adjustment and school functioning of young adolescents with multiple versus single learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 411–420.
67.
McLoydV. (1979). The effects on extrinsic rewards of differential value on high and low intrinsic interest. Child Development, 50, 1010–1019.
68.
MeeceJ.MillerS.D. (2001). A longitudinal analysis of elementary school students' achievement goals in literacy activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 454–480.
69.
MeyerM.S. (2000). The ability-achievement discrepancy: Does it contribute to an understanding of learning disabilities?Educational Psychology Review, 12, 315–337.
70.
MidgleyC.KaplanA.MiddletonM. (2001). Performance approach goals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost?Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 77–86.
71.
MorganP.FuchsD.(in press). A review of the evidence for a bidirectional relation between young children's reading skills and their motivation. Exceptional Children.
72.
MorganP.L.SideridisG.D.(in press). Contrasting the effectiveness of single-subject interventions on fluency for students with learning disabilities: A multilevel random coefficient modeling meta-analysis. Learning Disabilities: Research and Practice.
73.
MorrowL.M. (1992). The impact of a literature-based program on literacy achievement, use of literature and attitudes of children from minority backgrounds. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 250–275.
74.
NoelG.HoyC.KingM.MorelandC.MeeraJ. (1992). The MMPI-2 profile of adults with learning disabilities in university and rehabilitation settings. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 386–395.
75.
OakhillJ.V.CainK.BryantP.E. (2003). The dissociation of word reading and text comprehension: Evidence from component skills. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 443–468.
76.
OlivierM.A.J.SteenkampD.S. (2004). Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: underlying deficits in achievement motivation. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 26, 47–63.
77.
OnwuegbuzieA.LevinJ.R.LeachN.L. (2003). Do effect sizes measure up? A brief assessment. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 1, 37–40.
78.
PadeliaduS.SideridisG.D. (2000). Discriminant validation of the Test of Reading Performance (TORP) for identification of children with reading difficulties. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16, 139–146.
79.
PagetK.D.ReynoldsC.R. (1984). Dimensions, levels and reliabilities on the revised children's manifest anxiety scale with learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 137–141.
80.
PappaE.ZafiropoulouM.MetallidouP. (2003). Intervention on strategy use and on motivation of Greek pupils' reading comprension in English classes. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 96, 773–786.
81.
PintrichP.R.AndermanE.M.KlobucarC. (1994). Intraindividual differences in motivation and cognition in students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 360–370.
82.
PoskipartaE.NiemiP.LepolaJ.AhtolaA.LaineP. (2003). Motivational-emotional vulnerability and difficulties in learning to read and spell. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 187–206.
83.
QuirkM.P. (2004). Do supplemental remedial reading programs address the motivational issues of struggling readers? An analysis of five popular programs. Reading Research and Instruction, 43, 1–19.
84.
ReutzelD.R.SmithJ.A.FawsonP.C. (2005). An evaluation of two approaches for teaching reading comprehension strategies in the primary years using science information texts. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 20, 276–305.
85.
ReynoldsC.R.RichmondB.O. (1985). Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale: Manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
86.
ReynoldsC.R.RichmondB.O. (1978). What I think and feel: A revised measure of children's manifest anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 6, 271–280.
87.
Roeschl-HeilsA.SchneiderW.van KraayenoordC.E. (2003). Reading, metacognition and motivation: A follow-up study of German students in grades 7 and 8. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 18, 75–86.
88.
RubanL.M.McCoachD.B.McGuireJ.M.ReisS.M. (2003). The differential impact of academic self-regulatory methods on academic achievement among university students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 270–286.
89.
RyanA.M.GheenM.MidgleyC. (1998). Why do some students avoid asking for help? An examination of the interplay among students' academic efficacy, teachers' social-emotional role, and the classroom goal structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 528–535.
90.
SabatinoD.A. (1982). Research on achievement motivation with learning disabled populations. Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities, 1, 75–116.
91.
SchrawG.BruningR. (1999). How implicit models of reading affect motivation to read and reading engagement. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 281–302.
92.
ScruggsT.E.MastropieriM.A. (2002). On babies and bathwater: Addressing the problems of identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly; 25, 155–168.
SideridisG.D. (2002). Goal importance and students at-risk of having language difficulties: An underexplored aspect of students motivation. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 343–356.
95.
SideridisG.D. (2003). On the origins of helpless behavior in students with learning disabilities: Avoidance motivation?International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 497–517.
96.
SideridisG.D. (2005a). Performance approach-avoidance orienitation and planned behaviour theory: Model stability with Greek students with and without learning disabilities. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 21, 331–359.
97.
SideridisG.D. (2005b). Goal orientations, academic achievement, and depression: Evidence in favor of revised goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 366–375.
98.
SideridisG.D. (2006a). Understanding low achievement and depression in the LD: A goal orientation approach. International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, 31, 163–203.
99.
SideridisG.D. (2006b). Achievement goal orientations, “oughts” and self-regulation in students with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 29(1), 1–16.
100.
SideridisG.D.(in press). Classroom goal structures and hopelessness as predictors of day-to-day experience at school: Differences between students with and without learning disabilities. International Journal of Educational Research.
101.
SideridisG.D.MorganP.BotsasG.PadeliaduS.FuchsD. (2006). Predicting learning disabilities based on motivation, metacognition, and psychopathology. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 215–229.
102.
SideridisG.D.PadeliaduS. (2000). An examination of the psychometric properties of the Test of Reading Performance (TORP) with elementary school students. Psychological Reports, 86, 789–802.
103.
SideridisG.D.TsorbatzoudisCh. (2003). Intra-group motivational analysis of students with learning disabilities: A goal orientation approach. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 1, 8–19.
104.
SiegelL.S. (1989). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 469–478.
105.
SiegelL.S. (2003). IQ-discrepancy definitions and the diagnosis of LD: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 2–3.
106.
SofieC.A.RiccioC.A. (2002). A comparison of multiple methods for the identification of children with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 234–244.
107.
SpeeceD.L.ShekitkaL. (2002). How should reading disabilities be operationalized? A survey of experts. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17, 118–123.
108.
StuebingK.K.FletcherJ.M.LeDouxJ.M.LyonG.R.ShaywitzS.E.ShaywitzB.A. (2002). Validity of the IQ-discrepancy classifications for reading difficulties: A meta-analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 469–518.
109.
SutherlandK.S.SinghN.N. (2004). Learned helplessness and students with emotional or behavioral disorders: Deprivation in the classroom. Behavioral Disorders, 29, 210–223.
110.
SwansonS.HowellC.C. (1996). Test anxiety in adolescents with learning disabilities and behavior disorder. Exceptional Children, 62, 389–397.
111.
ThomasS.OldfatherP. (1997). Reflections on motivations for reading - through the looking glass of theory, practice, and reader experiences. Educational Psychologist, 32, 125–134.
112.
ValasH. (1999). Students with learning disabilities and low achieving students: Peer acceptance, loneliness, self-esteem, and depression. Social Psychology of Education, 3, 173–192.
113.
ValasH. (2001). Learned helplessness and psychological adjustment: Effects of learning disabilities and low achievement. ScandinavianJournal of Educational Research, 45, 101–114.
114.
VaughnS.FuchsL.S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential pitfalls. Learning Disabilities: Research and Practice, 18, 137–146.
115.
VaurasM.RauhanummiT.KinnunenR.LepolaJ. (1999). Motivational vulnerability as a challenge for educational inter-ventions. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 515–531.
116.
WatkinsM. (2005). Diagnostic validity of Wechsler subtest scatter. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 3, 18–27.
117.
WatkinsM.W.CoffeyD. (2004). Reading motivation: Multidimensional and indeterminate. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 110–118.
118.
WatkinsM.W.KushJ.C.GluttingJ.J. (1997). Discriminant and predictive validity of the WISC-III ACID profile among children with learning disabilities. Psychology in the Schools, 34, 309–319.
119.
WatkinsM.W.KushJ.C.SchaeferB.A. (2002). Diagnostic utility of the learning disability index. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 98–103.
120.
WatsonD.ClarkL. (1992). Affects separable and inseparable: On the hierarchical arrangement of the negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 489–505.
121.
WatsonD.ClarkL.A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.
122.
WigfieldA. (1997). Reading motivation: A domain-specific approach to motivation. Educational Psychologist, 32, 59–68.
123.
WigfieldA.GuthrieJ.T. (1995). Dimensions of children's motivations for reading: An initial study (Research Rep. No. 34). Athens, GA: National Reading Research Center.
124.
WigfieldA.GuthrieJ.T. (1997). Relations of children's motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 420–433.
125.
YasutakeD.BryanT. (1995). The influence of affect on the achievement and behavior of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 329–334.
126.
ZajoncR.B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151–175.
