This paper uses a longitudinal case study of the mutual fund provider, The Vanguard Group, to understand the developmental processes that lead to organizational configurations and fit. A new method for determining an organization's core elements is developed, and four processes are identified that describe the creation and subsequent elaboration of these core elements: thickening (reinforcement of an existing core element by new elaborating elements), patching (creation of a new core element and its reinforcement by new elaborating elements), coasting (no further elaboration of a new core element in a given period), and trimming (deletion of a core element and its elaborating elements). The four processes are used to describe organizations' development paths toward configurations and their transitions between configurations, including two new ideal types, termed thin-to-thick and patch-by-patch, as well as two known paths between configurations, the punctuated equilibrium path and reorientation through linear progression.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaronJ. N.HannanM. T.BurtonM. D.: 1999“Building the iron cage: Determinants of managerial intensity in the early years of organizations.”American Sociological Review, 64: 527–547.
2.
BogleJ. C.: 1951“The economic role of the investment company.” Honors thesis, Princeton University. Vanguard Archive, Valley Forge, PA.
3.
BogleJ. C.: 1974“The future structure of the Wellington Group of investment companies, part 1.” March 11. Vanguard Archive, Valley Forge, PA.
4.
BogleJ. C.: 1975“The winds of change: The Vanguard experiment in internalized management.” Speech at the FBA-CCH Conference on Mutual Funds and Investment Management, San Diego, March 12. Vanguard Archive, Valley Forge, PA.
5.
BogleJ. C.: 1977“Marketing mutual fund shares in the 1980s.” Remarks to the National Investment Company Service Association, March 10. Vanguard Archive, Valley Forge, PA.
6.
BogleJ. C.: 1986“Vanguard and victory.”A collection of twelve talks to the staff of The Vanguard Group between 1980 and 1986. Vanguard Archive, Valley Forge, PA.
7.
BogleJ. C.: 1999“Human beings: Essential link in the service-profit chain.” Remarks at Harvard Business School, December 7. Vanguard Archive, Valley Forge, PA.
8.
BrownS. L.EisenhardtK. M.: 1997“The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 1–34.
9.
BurnsT.StalkerG. M.: 1961The Management of Innovation. London: Tavistock.
10.
DrazinR.Van de VenA. H.: 1985“Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 30: 514–539.
11.
EastonT.: 1996“Some like it hot, some like it cheap.”Forbes, February 12: 114–119.
12.
EisenhardtK. M.: 1989“Building theory from case study research.”Academy of Management Review, 14: 532–550.
13.
EisenhardtK. M.BrownS. L.: 1999“Patching: Restitching business portfolios in dynamic markets.”Harvard Business Review, 77(May-June): 72–82.
14.
FreemanL. C.: 1977“A set of measures of centrality based on between-ness.”Sociometry, 40: 35–41.
15.
FreemanL. C.: 1979“Centrality in social networks: I. Conceptual clarification.”Social Networks, 1: 215–239.
16.
GavettiG.LevinthalD.: 2000“Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 113–137.
17.
GersickC. J. G.: 1991“Revolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm.”Academy of Management Review, 16: 10–36.
18.
GhemawatP.LevinthalD.: 2000“Choice structures and business strategy.” Working paper 01–012, Harvard Business School, Boston.
19.
GoldenB. R.: 1992“The past is the past—Or is it? The use of retrospective accounts as indicators of past strategy.”Academy of Management Journal, 35: 848–860.
20.
GreenwoodR.HiningsC. R.: 1988“Organizational design types, tracks and the dynamics of strategic change.”Organization Studies, 9: 293–316.
21.
HallowellR.: 1997 “Dual competitive advantage in labor-dependent services: Evidence, analysis, and implications.” BowenD. E.BrownS. W.SwartzT. A. (eds.), Advances in Services Marketing and Management, 6: 23–59. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
22.
HannanM. T.BurtonM. D.BaronJ. N.: 1996“Inertia and change in the early years: Employment relations in young, high-technology firms.”Industrial and Corporate Change, 5: 503–536.
HeinsJ.: 1985“Out of the ashes.”Forbes, September 23: 220–221.
25.
JaikumarR.: 1986“Postindustrial manufacturing.”Harvard Business Review, 64(6): 69–76.
26.
KauffmanS. A.: 1995At Home in the Universe: The Search for Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity. New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
KhandwallaP. N.: 1973“Viable and effective organizational designs of firms.”Academy of Management Journal, 16: 481–495.
28.
LevinthalD. A.: 1997“Adaptation on rugged landscapes.”Management Science, 43: 934–950.
29.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.: 1984Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30.
MilesR. E.SnowC. C.: 1978Organizational Strategy, Structure and Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
31.
MilgromP. R.RobertsJ.: 1990“The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy, and organization.”American Economic Review, 80: 511–528.
32.
MilgromP. R.RobertsJ.: 1995“Complementarities and fit: Strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing.”Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19: 179–208.
33.
MillerD.: 1981“Toward a new contingency perspective: The search for organizational gestalts.”Journal of Management Studies, 18: 1–26.
MillerD.FriesenP. H.: 1980“Momentum and revolution in organizational adaptation.”Academy of Management Journal, 23:591–614.
36.
MillerD.FriesenP. H.: 1982“Structural change and performance: Quantum versus piecemeal-incremental approaches.”Academy of Management Journal, 25: 867–892.
37.
MillerD.FriesenP. H.: 1984Organizations: A Quantum View. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
38.
MintzbergH.: 1979The Structuring of Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
PentlandB. T.RueterH. H.: 1994“Organizational routines as grammars of action.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 39:484–510.
41.
PorterM. E.: 1985Competitive Advantage. New York: Free Press.
42.
PorterM. E.: 1996“What is strategy?”Harvard Business Review, 74(6): 61–78.
43.
RaffD. M. G.: 2000“Superstores and the evolution of firm capabilities in American bookselling.”Strategic Management Journal, 21: 1043–1059.
44.
RivkinJ. W.: 2000“Imitation of complex strategies.”Management Science, 46: 824–844.
45.
RivkinJ. W.SiggelkowN.: 2002“Coordinating coordination: Interactions among elements of organizational structure.” Working paper, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
46.
RohrerJ.: 1995“A burst of interactivity at Vanguard.”Institutional Investor, September: 171.
47.
RomanelliE.TushmanM. L.: 1994“Organizational transformation as punctuated equilibrium: An empirical test.”Academy of Management Journal, 37: 1141–1166.
48.
SandersC. V.: 1996“Dear shareholder.”Morningstar Mutual Funds, April 26: S1–S2.
49.
SavitzE. J.: 1997“Tortoise wins again.” Barron's, January 6: F7.
50.
SiggelkowN.: 2001“Change in the presence of fit: The rise, the fall, and the renaissance of Liz Claiborne.”Academy of Management Journal, 44: 838–857.
SlaterR.: 1997John Bogle and the Vanguard Experiment. Chicago: Irwin.
53.
StephensonK.ZelenM.: 1989“Rethinking centrality: Methods and applications.”Social Networks, 11: 1–37.
54.
TushmanM. L.RomanelliE.: 1985 “Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation.” CummingsL. L.StawB. M. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 7: 171–222. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
55.
WassermanS.FaustK.: 1994Social Network Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
56.
WhittingtonR.PettigrewA.PeckS.FentonE.ConyonM.: 1999“Change and complementarities in the new competitive landscape: A European panel study, 1992–1996.”Organization Science, 10: 583–600.
