Structuring Small Groups and Music Reinforcement to Facilitate Positive Interactions and Acceptance of Severely Handicapped Students in the Regular Music Classroom
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 1984
Structuring Small Groups and Music Reinforcement to Facilitate Positive Interactions and Acceptance of Severely Handicapped Students in the Regular Music Classroom
Positive interactions of severely handicapped students integrated into four grade levels of I elementary music classes were studied under three teaching conditions: (a) large group, (b) small cooperative group, and (c) small cooperative group with a music listening contingency for cooperation. The design consisted of multiple baselines for social interaction with pretest and posttest measures of nonhandicapped students' general acceptance and acceptance of their severely handicapped peers within music. The mean rates of positive interactions were found to increase relative to the degree to which antecedents (small group) and reinforcement (music) were structured for interactions. Mean rates were highest under small group contingency conditions and lowest under large group conditions. Grades with the highest rates of positive interactions indicated significant positive change for music as well as general acceptance. Results indicate that positive social interactions between nonhandicapped and handicapped students in the integrated music classroom with increases in nonhandicapped students' acceptance are not a result of music classroom experiences and music instruction alone but the degree to which teaching conditions specifically structure classroom antecedents and reinforcement for social interaction. Benefits of the integrated music classroom are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alley, J. M. (1979). Music in the IEP: Therapy/education.Journal of Music Therapy, 16, 111–127.
2.
Asher, S. E., & Taylor, A. R. (1981). The social outcomes of mainstreaming: Sociometric assessment and beyond.Exceptional Education Quarterly, 1(4), 13–30.
3.
Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91–97.
4.
Brown, L., Branston, M. B., Hamre-Nietupski, S., Johnson, F., Wilcox, B., & Gruenewald, L. A. (1979). Rationale for comprehensive longitudinal interactions between severely handicapped students and nonhandicapped students and other citizens.American Association for the Education of the Severely and Profoundly Handicapped Review, 4(1), 3–14.
5.
Brown, L., Nietupski, J., & Hamre-Nietupski, S. (1976). Criterion of ultimate functioning. In N. A. Thomas (Ed.), Hey, don't forget about me!Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children, 8–15.
6.
Cottrell, N. B. (1968). Performance in the presence of other human beings: Mere presence, audience and alienation effects. In E. D. Semmel, R. A. Hoppe, and G. A. Milton (Eds.), Social facilitation and imitative behavior.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
7.
Dorow, L. (1976). Televised music lessons as educational reinforcement for correct mathematical responses with the educable mentally retarded.Journal of Music Therapy, 13, 77–86.
8.
Forsythe, J. L., & Jellison, J. A. (1977). It's the law.Music Educators Journal, 64(3), 30–35.
9.
Gilbert, J. P. (1977). Mainstreaming in your classroom: What to expect.Music Educators Journal, 63(6), 64–68.
10.
Gilbert, J. P., & Asmus, E. P. (1981). Mainstreaming: Music educators' participation and professional needs.Journal of Research in Music Education, 29, 31–37.
11.
Gottlieb, B. (1982). Social facilitation influences on the oral reading performance of academically handicapped children.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 87, 153–158.
12.
Graham, R., & Beer, A. (1980). Teaching music to the exceptional child.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
13.
Greer, R. D. (1981). An operant approach to motivation and affect: Ten years of research in music learning. In Documentary Report of the Ann Arbor Symposium: Applications of Psychology to the Teaching and Learning of Music.Reston, VA: Music Educators National Conference.
14.
Greer, R. D., Dorow, L. G., & Harrison, L. N. (1975). Aural discrimination instruction and the preferences of sixth graders for music listening, story listening, and candy. In C. K. Madsen, R. D. Greer, and C. H. Madsen, Jr. (Eds.), Search in music behavior: Modifying music behavior in the classroom.New York: Teachers College Press.
15.
Greer, R. D., Dorow, L.G., & Randall, A. (1974). Music listening preferences of elementary school children.Journal of Research in Music Education, 22, 284–291.
16.
Hamre-Nietupski, S., & Nietupski, J. (1981). Integral involvement of severely handicapped students within regular public schools.Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 6(2), 30–39.
17.
Hardesty, K. W. (1979). Music for special education.Morristown, NJ: Silver Burdett.
18.
Hazard, W. R. (1979). A tort is not a piece of cake: Teacher's legal responsibilities.Music Educators Journal, 65(8), 26–33.
19.
Jellison, J. (1979). The music therapist in the educational setting: Developing and implementing curriculum for the handicapped.Journal of Music Therapy, 16, 128–137.
20.
Jellison, J. (1983). Functional value as criterion for selection and prioritization of nonmusic and music objectives in music therapy.Music Therapy Perspectives, 1(2), 17–22.
21.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1975). Learning together and alone: Cooperation, competition, and individualization.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
22.
Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1980). Integrating handicapped students into the mainstream.Exceptional Children, 47, 90–98.
23.
Lament, M. M. (1978). Reaching the exceptional student through music in the elementary classroom.Teaching Exceptional Children, 11, 32–35.
24.
Lathom, W. (1980). Role of music therapy in the education of handicapped children and youth.Washington, DC: Hawkins & Associates.
25.
Madsen, C. K., Dorow, L. G., Moore, R. S., & Womble, J. U. (1976). Effect of music lessons via television as reinforcement for correct mathematical responses.Journal of Research in Music Education, 24, 50–59.
26.
Madsen, C. K., & Geringer, J. M. (1976). Choice of televised music lessons versus free play in relationship to academic improvement.Journal of Music Therapy, 13, 154–162.
27.
Madsen, C. K., Greer, R. D., & Madsen, C. H., Jr. (1975). Research in music behavior: Modifying music behavior in the classroom.New York: Teachers College Press.
28.
Madsen, C. K., & Madsen, C. H., Jr. (1972). Selection of music listening or candy as a function of contingent versus noncontingent reinforcement and scale singing.Journal of Music Therapy, 9, 190–198.
29.
McHale, S. M., & Simeonsson, R. J. (1980). Effects of interaction on handicapped children's attitudes toward autistic children.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 85, 18–24.
30.
Miller, D. M. (1977). Effects of music listening contingencies on arithmetic performance and music preference of EMR children.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 81, 371–378.
31.
Miller, D. D., Dorow, L. G., & Greer, R. D. (1974). The contingent use of music and art for improving arithmetic scores.Journal of Music Therapy, 11, 57–64.
32.
Nietupski, J., Hamre-Nietupski, S., Schuetz, G., & Ockwood, L. (Eds.). (1980). Severely handicapped students in regular schools.Milwaukee: Milwaukee Public Schools.
33.
Nocera, S. (1979). Reaching the special learner through music.Morristown, NJ: Silver Burdett.
34.
Rynders, J. E., Johnson, R. T., Johnson, D. W., & Schmidt, B. (1980). Producing positive interaction among Down syndrome and nonhandicapped teenagers through cooperative goal structuring.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 83, 268–273.
35.
Semmel, M. J., Gottlieb, J., & Robinson, M. (1979). In D. Berliner (Ed.), Review of research in education: Vol. 7.Itasca, IL: Peacock Publisher.
36.
Sontag, E., Certo, N., & Button, J. E. (1979). On a distinction between the education of the severely and profoundly handicapped and a doctrine of limitations.Exceptional Children, 45, 604–616.
37.
Stainback, W., & Stainback, S. (1981). A review of research on interactions between severely handicapped and nonhandicapped students.Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 6(2), 23–29.
38.
Stainback, W., Stainback, S., & Jaben, T. (1981). Providing opportunities for interaction between severely handicapped and nonhandicapped students. Teaching Exceptional Children, 1372–75.
39.
Stainback, W., Stainback, S., Raschke, D., & Anderson, R. J. (1981). Three methods for encouraging interactions between severely retarded and non-handicapped students.Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 16, 188–192.
40.
Strain, P. (Ed.). (1981). Peer relations of exceptional children and youth [thematic issue]. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 1(4), 1–115.
41.
Taylor, R. G. (Ed.). (1982). Music for every child: Teaching special students [thematic issue]. Music Educators Journal, 68(8), 25–57.
42.
Thompson, K. (1982). Education of handicapped learners.Music Educators Journal, 68(8), 25–28.
43.
Voeltz, L. M. (1980). Children's attitudes toward handicapped peers.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 84, 455–464.
44.
Voeltz, L. M. (1982). Effects of structured interaction with severely handicapped peers on children's attitudes.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86, 380–390.
