Evaluation of three types of Instructional Strategy for Learner Acquisition of Intervals

Abstract

The current study examined the question of what type of instructional strategy most effectively facilitates the learning of music intervals for beginning music majors. The three types of instructional strategy were programmed instruction in the form of a linear programmed text, mastery learning using computer-assisted instruction (CAI), and self-practice using a textbook-study approach. This study also explored the variable of information retention over time. The delayed-retention test was given 48 hours after the test of immediate retention. Results on the dependent measure of retention indicated that mastery leaming-CAl was a significantly better instructional strategy for learning music intervals than programmed instruction or self-practice. The results indicated a significantly higher performance score for mastery leaming-CAl and programmed instruction over self-practice. The self-practice condition was left at a disadvantage in this regard because the learner had to decide what was relevant and what must be learned from what should be ignored. The attitude measure result indicated that learners prefer instructional information to be well organized.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aldwell, E ., & Schachter, C. Harmony and voice leading, Vol. I. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, Inc., 1978.

Ammons, H ., & Irion, A. C. A note on the Ballard reminiscence phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1954, 48, 184–186.

Arnold, P. G. , & Bower, G. H. Perceptual conditions affecting ease of association. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972, 93, 176–180.

Asch, S. E. Reformulation of the problem of association. American Psychologist. 1969, 24, 92–102.

Asch, S. E. , Ceraso, J. , & Heimer, W. Perceptual conditions in association. Psychological Monographs, 1960, 57(Whole no. 3).

Ausubel, D . Meaningful reception learning and the acquisition of concepts. In H. Klausmeier and C. Harris (Eds.), Analysis of concept learning. New York: Academic Press, 1966.

Block, J. H. Student learning and the setting of mastery performance standards. Educational Horizons, Summer 1972, 50, 183–191.

Block, J. H. (Ed.). Mastery learning: Theory and practice. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1971.

Bloom, B. S. Learning for mastery. Evaluation Comment, University of California, 1968. (Reprinted in Block, J. H. Mastery learning, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1971.)

10.

Bousfield, W. A. The occurrence of clustering in the recall of randomly arranged associates. Journal of General Psychology, 1953, 49, 229–240.

11.

Bower, G. H. How to… oh… remember. Psychology Today, October 1973, 63–70.

12.

Bower, G. H. , & Winznez, D. Groups structure, coding, and memory for digit series. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs, 1969, 80(2 Pt. 2), 1–17.

13.

Canelos, J. J. The instructional effectiveness of differentiated imagery strategies on different levels of information processing when students receive visualized instruction consisting of varying stimulus complexity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, 1979.

14.

Carroll, J. B. A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 1967, 64, 723–733.

15.

Clough, J . Scales, intervals, keys and triads. New York: W. W. Norton, 1964.

16.

Cross, P. K. Accent on learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1976.

17.

Crutchfield, R. S. Instructing the individual in creative thinking. New approaches to individualizing instruction: A report of a conference. Princeton, New Jersey: Educational Testing Service, 1965.

18.

Dubin, R ., & Taveggia, T. C. The teaching-learning paradox. Eugene, Oregon: Center for the Advanced Study of Educational Administration, University of Oregon, 1968.

19.

Hilgard, E. R. , & Bower, G. H. Theories of learning. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1975.

20.

Hyde, T. S. , & Jenkins, J. J. Differential effects of incidental tasks on the organization of recall of a list of highly associated words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969, 52, 472–481.

21.

Kohler, W . On the nature of associations. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 1941, 54, 489–502.

22.

Miller, G. A. , Galanter, E. , & Pribram, K. H. Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1960.

23.

Reitman, W. R. Cognition and thought. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1965.

24.

Rothkopf, E. Z. Some theoretical and experimental approaches to problems in written instruction. In J. D. Krumboltz (Ed.), Learning and the educational process. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1965.

25.

Rothkopf, E. Z. , & Bisbicos, E. E. Selective facilitative effects of interspersed questions on learning from written materials. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1967, 55, 56–61.

26.

Skinner, B. F. Teaching machines. Science, 1958, 129, 969–977.

27.

Stolurow, L. M. Programmed learning. In R. L. Ebel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research (4th ed.). Washington, D.C.: AERA, 1969.