Pitch,Tempo,and Timbral Preferences in Recorded Piano Music

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to obtain pitch, tempo, and timbre preferences of undergraduate music students. The effects of each of these variables were assessed independently of the other two within a realistic listening situation. Ninety-six subjects were randomly assigned to four groups. All subjects heard 12 excerpts of familiar and unfamiliar solo piano music. Subjects in groups 2, 3, and 4 selected pitch level, tempo, and timbral quality, respectively. Group 1 subjects modulated a dial connected to the speed control on a variable-speed tape recorder by which they modulated these variables simultaneously. Results indicated a large preference for increased tape speed by Group 1 subjects; preferences for fast tempo and bright timbre when each variable was examined independently from the effects of other variables; no particular preference for pitch levels significantly different from those heard on unaltered recordings; no relationship between accuracy of response and excerpt familiarity; and preference direction was a function of excerpt familiarity for subjects in Group 3 (Tempo) only.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cameron, E. H. Tonal reactions. Psychological Review, Monograph Supplement, 1907, 8, 227–300.

Drake, A.H. An experimental study of selected variables in the performance of musical durational notation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 1968, 16, 329–338.

Franz, F. Metronome techniques. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1947.

Geringer, J. M. Tuning preferences in recorded orchestral music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 1976, 24, 169–176.

Kuhn, T. L. Discrimination of modulated beat tempo by professional musicians. Journal of Research in Music Education, 1974, 22, 270–277.

Kuhn, T. L. Effects of dynamics, halves of exercise, and trial sequences on tempo accuracy. Journal of Research in Music Education, 1977, 25, 222–227.

Kuhn, T. L. , & Gates, E. E. Effect of notational values, age, and example length on tempo performance accuracy. Journal of Research in Music Education, 1975, 23, 203–210.

Lloyd, L. S. Standard pitch. In Grove, G. (Ed.), Grove' s dictionary of music and musicians, VI, 788–803. New York: St. Martin' s Press, 1955.

Madsen, C. K. Modulated beat discrimination among musicians and non-musicians. Paper presented at the MENC National In-Service Conference, Chicago, April 1978.

10.

Madsen, C. K. , Edmonson, F. A. , & Madsen, C. H., Jr. Modulated frequency discrimination in relationship to age and musical training. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1969, 46, 1, 468–1, 471.

11.

Madsen, C. K. , & Geringer, J. M. Preferences for trumpet tone quality versus intonation. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 1976, 46, 13–22.

12.

Mason, J. A. Comparison of solo and ensemble performances with reference to Pythagorean, just, and equi-tempered intonations. Journal of Research in Music Education, 1960, 8, 31–38.

13.

Nickerson, J. F. Intonation of solo and ensemble performance of the same melody. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1949, 21, 593–595.

14.

Schoen, M. An experimental study of the pitch factor in artistic singing. Psychological Monographs, 1922, 31, 230–259.

15.

Small, A. M. An objective analysis of artistic violin performance. University of Iowa Studies in the Psychology of Music, 1937, 4, 172–231.

16.

Young, R. W. Making cents out of cents. Oak Brook, Ill.: C. G. Conn, 1976.