This study is an examination of teacher and student behavior in 48 violin and cello lessons taught by 12 expert Suzuki string teachers. One representative excerpt of work on a repertoire piece that had been introduced in a preceding lesson was extracted from each lesson videotape and analyzed in detail. Each excerpt was divided into segments (labeled “rehearsal frames”) that encompassed the instructional activities devoted to proximal performance goals (labeled “targets”) identified by the teacher. Targets were recorded for each rehearsal frame and categorized according to the teacher's description of the target and according to the aspect of performance to which the target pertained. Instructional activities within 338 rehearsal frames were examined in terms of the rates, durations, and proportions of time devoted to aspects of teacher and student behavior. Across all rehearsal frames (N = 338), approximately 45% of the total time was devoted to teacher verbalizations, 20% to teacher modeling, and 41% to student performance. Episodes of teacher and student activity were frequent and brief, indicating a rapid pace of instruction. Lessons were characterized by high rates of approvals and a clear focus on one aspect of performance at a time.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allard, M. A. (1992). A comparison of specialists and non-specialists teaching elementary beginning string music: Time use, student attentiveness, and performance quality. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
2.
Arnold, J. A. (1995). Effects of competency-based methods of instruction and self-observation on ensemble directors' use of sequential patterns. Journal of Research in Music Education, 43, 127–138.
3.
Berliner, D. C. (1986). In pursuit of the expert pedagogue. Educational Researcher, 15 (7), 5–13.
4.
Brand, M. (1985). Research in music teacher effectiveness. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 3 (2), 13–16.
5.
Buckner, J. J. (1997). Assessment of teacher and student behavior in relation to the accomplishment of performance goals in piano lessons. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.
6.
Cowden, R. L. (1975). A comparison of first and third position approaches to violin instruction. Journal of Research in Music Education, 20, 505–509.
7.
Duke, R. A. (1987). Observation of applied music instruction: The perceptions of trained and untrained observers. In C. K. Madsen & C. A. Prickett (Eds.), Applications of research in music behavior.Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
8.
Duke, R. A. (1994). Making lasting change in musical performance: The rehearsal frame as a model for prescriptive analysis of music teaching. Journal of Band Research, 30, 78–95.
9.
Duke, R. A., & Blackman, M. D. (1991). The relationship between observer's recorded teacher behavior and evaluation of music instruction. Journal of Research in Music Education, 39, 290–297.
10.
Duke, R. A., & Colprit, E. J. (1996). Defining expertise in applied music teaching: Two ease studies of timing and structure. Manuscript.
11.
Duke, R. A., D'Ercole, P., Burton, J., Hersh, S., Jackson, N., Partee, L., Scott, L., Zeller, L., & Colprit, E. J. (1996, April). Broadening the research base in string education: The North American String Education Project. Research presented at the Music Educators National Conference, Kansas City, MO.
12.
Duke, R. A., & Farra, Y. (1997). SCRIBE: Simple Computer Recording Interface for Behavior Evaluation.Austin, TX: Learning and Behavior Resources.
13.
Duke, R. A., & Madsen, C. K. (1991). Proactive versus reactive teaching: Focusing observation on specific aspects of instruction. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 108, 1–14.
14.
Duke, R. A., Prickett, C. A., & Jellison, J. A. (1998). Empirical description of the pace of music instruction. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 265–280.
15.
Ellsworth, E. V. (1985). A descriptive analysis of the characteristics of effective high school orchestra directors including a study of selected rehearsal characteristics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
16.
Forsythe, J. L. (1977). Elementary student attending behavior as a function of classroom activities. Journal of Research in Music Education, 25, 228–239.
17.
Gillespie, R. (1988). Identification of factors for evaluating upper string instrument spiccato bowing and a comparison of two instructional approaches. Dialogue in Instrumental Music Education, 12 (1), 21–33.
18.
Gillespie, R. (1989). A comparison of the relative effects of structured video training and teacher directed instruction on the development of violin bowing diagnostic skills. Dialogue in Instrumental Music Education, 13 (2), 87–98.
19.
Goolsby, T. W. (1996). Time use in instrumental rehearsals: A comparison of three career levels and preservice teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 44, 286–303.
20.
Goolsby, T. W. (1997). Verbal instruction in instrumental rehearsals: A comparison of experienced, novice, and student teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 21–40.
21.
Goolsby, T. W. (1999). A comparison of expert and novice music teachers' preparing identical band compositions: An operational replication. Journal of Research in Music Education, 47, 174–187.
22.
Hendel, C. (1995). Behavioral characteristics and instructional patterns of selected music teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 43, 182–203.
23.
Jensen, L. L. (1990). A comparison of initial violin bow hold approaches in undergraduate string technique classes, including assessments of the influence of baseline ratings of subjects' finger dexterity and mental image of bow hold. Dialogue in Instrumental Music Education, 14 (1), 10–30.
24.
Kantorski, V. J., & Ellsworth, E. V. (1988). The effects of homogeneous and heterogeneous instruction in college string techniques classes on music education majors' string performance. Dialogue in Instrumental Music Education, 12 (2), 80–92.
25.
Kostka, M. J. (1984). An investigation of reinforcements, time use, and student attentiveness in piano lessons. Journal of Research in Music Education, 32, 80–92.
26.
Maag, R. R. (1974). A comparison of the effectiveness of pentatonic versus diatonic instruction in the intonation of beginning string students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
27.
Madsen, C. K. (1990). Teacher intensity in relationship to music education. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 104, 38–46.
28.
Madsen, C. K., & Duke, R. A., (1985). Observation of approval/disapproval in music: Perception versus actual classroom events. Journal of Research in Music Education, 33, 205–214.
29.
Madsen, C. K., & Geringer, J. M. (1989). The relationship of teacher “on task” to intensity and effective music teaching. Canadian Journal of Research in Music Education, 30, 87–94.
30.
McNair, K. (1978-79). Capturing in-flight decisions: Thoughts while teaching. Educational Research Quarterly, 3 (4), 26–42.
31.
Moore, R. S. (1982). Comparative use of teaching time by American and British elementary music specialists. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 66, 62–68.
32.
Morine-Dershimer, G. (1978-79). Planning in classroom reality: An in-depth look. Educational Research Quarterly, 3 (4), 83–89.
33.
Price, H. E. (1983). The effect of conductor academic task presentation, conductor reinforcement, and ensemble practice on performers' musical achievement. Journal of Research in Music Education, 31, 245–257.
34.
Price, H. E. (1989). An effective way to teach and rehearse: Research supports using sequential patterns. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 8(1), 42–46.
35.
Saunders, C. T. (1990). Teacher effectiveness in the performance classroom. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 8 (2), 26–29.
36.
Shavelson, R. J. (1973). What is the basic teaching skill?Journal of Teacher Education, 24 (2), 144–151.
37.
Siebenaler, D. J. (1997). Analysis of teacher-student interactions in the piano lessons of adults and children. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 6–20.
38.
Smith, C. M. (1985). The effect of finger placement markers on the development of intonation accuracy in beginning string students. Dialogue in Instrumental Music Education, 9 (2), 62–85.
39.
Smith, C. M. (1987). The effect of finger placement markers on the development of intonation accuracy in fourth and fifth-grade beginning string students. Dialogue in Music Education, 11 (2), 71–77.
40.
Speer, D. R. (1994). An analysis of sequential patterns of instruction in piano lessons. Journal of Research in Music Education, 42, 14–26.
41.
Standley, J. M., & Madsen, C. K. (1991). An observation procedure to differentiate teaching experience and expertise in music education. Journal of Research in Music Education, 39, 5–11.
42.
Westerman, D. A. (1991). Expert and novice teacher decision making. Journal of Teacher Education, 42(4), 292–305.
43.
Witt, A. C. (1986). Use of class time and student attentiveness in secondary instrumental music rehearsals. Journal of Research in Music Education, 34, 34–42.
44.
Yarbrough, C., & Price, H. E. (1989). Sequential patterns of instruction in music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 37, 179–187.
45.
Yarbrough, C., & Price, H. E., & Hendel, C. (1994). The effect of sequential patterns and modes of presentation on the evaluation of music teaching. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 120, 33–45.
