This study was designed to investigate listeners' preferences for music of other cultures, as determined by 10-point Likert-type scales and by continuous ratings taken throughout the duration of each excerpt with a Continuous Response Digital Interface (CRDI). Music major (n = 75), nonmusic major (n = 75), and junior high school (n = 75) musicians participated. One-third of each groups subjects rated the selections with a Likert-type rating-scale, representing a summative, static response. One-third of each group used a single CRDI dial to continuously show preference throughout the music. The remaining third continuously manipulated two CRDI dials, one to indicate preference and the other complexity. Selections representing the following cultures were included: the Caribbean, Africa, India, and Oceania. Listeners using the continuous measurement responses rated selections significantly higher than did listeners using paper-and-pencil rating scales (p < .05). There was no significant difference in preference between listeners who rated preference only and listeners who rated preference and complexity. There were no significant differences attributable to level of music experience. These results have implications for (1) the way teachers present new material to students, (2) the manner in which teachers structure student feedback, and (3) the technological devices teachers use for music activities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abeles, H. F. (1980). Responses to music. In D. A. Hodges (Ed.), Handbook of music psychology (pp. 105–140). Lawrence, KS: National Association for Music Therapy.
2.
Alpert, J. I. (1982). The effect of disc jockey, peer, and music teacher approval of music on music selection and preference. Journal of Research in Music Education, 30, 173–186.
3.
Boyle, J. D., Hesterman, G. L., & Ramsey, D. S. (1981). Factors influencing pop music preferences of young people. Journal of Research in Music Education, 29, 47–56.
4.
Brittin, R V. (1991). The effect of overtly categorizing music on preference for popular music styles. Journal of Research in Music Education, 39, 143–151.
5.
Brittin, R V., & Sheldon, D. A. (in press). Comparing continuous versus static measurements in music listeners' preferences. Journal of Research in Musk Education.
6.
Capperella, D. A. (1989). Reliability of the continuous response digital interface for data collection in the study of auditory perception. Southeastern Journal of Music Education, 1, 19–32.
7.
Cutietta, R. A., & Foustalieraki, M. (1990). Preferences for select band and non-band instrument timbres among students in the United States and Greece. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 105, 72–80.
8.
Darrow, A., Haack, R, & Kuribayashi, F. (1987). Descriptors and preferences for Eastern and Western music by Japanese and American nonmusic majors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 35, 237–248.
9.
Dorow, L. G. (1977). The effect of teacher approval-disapproval ratios on student music selection and concert attentiveness. Journal of Research in Music Education, 25, 32–40.
10.
Finnas, L. (1989). How can musical preferences be modified? A research review. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 102, 1–59.
11.
Flowers, P.J. (1980). Relationship between two measures of music preference. Contributions to Music Education, 8, 47–54.
12.
Fung, C. V. (1994). Undergraduate nonmusic majors' world music preference and multicultural attitudes. Journal of Research in Music Education, 42, 45–57.
13.
Furman, C. E., & Duke, R. A. (1988). Effect of majority consensus on preferences for recorded orchestral and popular music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 36, 220–231.
14.
Geringer, J. (1982). Verbal and operant music listening preferences in relationship to age and musical training. Psychology of Music [Special Issue], 47–50.
15.
Geringer, J., & Madsen, C. K. (1987). Pitch and tempo preferences in recorded popular music. In C. K Madsen & C. A. Prickett (Eds.), Applications of research in music behavior (pp. 244–253). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
16.
Geringer, J., & McManus, D. (1979). A survey of musical taste in relationship to age and musical training. College Music Symposium, 19, 69–76.
17.
Gregory, D. (1989). Using computers to measure continuous music responses. Psychomusicology, 8, 127–134.
18.
Gregory, D. (1993). Relationships between music training and music preference. New Ways, 8(2), C–5.
19.
Hargreaves, D. J. (1984). The effects of repetition on liking for music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 32, 35–47.
20.
Inglefield, H. G. (1972). Conformity behavior reflected in the musical preference of adolescents. Psychology of Music, 8, 13–18.
21.
Jaret, C. (1982). Hits or just heartaches: Characteristics of successful and unsuccessful country music. Popular Music and Society, 8(2), 113–124.
22.
Johnson, C. M. (1992). Use of the continuous response digital interface in the evaluation of live musical performance. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 20, 261–271.
23.
Killian, J. N. (1990). Effect of model characteristics on musical preference of junior high students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 38, 115–123.
24.
Kuhn, T. L. (1980). Instrumentation for the measurement of music attitudes. Contributions to Music Education, 8, 2–38.
25.
LeBlanc, A. (1982). An interactive theory of music preference. Journal of Music Therapy, 19, 28–45.
26.
LeBlanc, A. (1984). Selecting a response mode in music preference research. Contributions to Music Education, 11, 1–14.
27.
LeBlanc, A, Colman, J., McCrary, J., Sherrill, C, & Malin, S. (1988). Tempo preferences of different age music listeners. Journal of Research in Music Education, 36, 156–168.
28.
LeBlanc, A, Sims, W., Malin, S., & Sherrill, C. (1992). Relationship between humor perceived in music and preferences of different-age listeners. Journal of Research in Music Education, 40, 269–282.
29.
Madsen, C. K, Brittin, R. V., & Capperella-Sheldon, D. (1993). An empirical method for measuring the aesthetic experience to music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 57–69.
30.
Madsen, C. K, Capperella-Sheldon, D., & Johnson, C. M. (1991). Use of the continuous response digital interface (CRDI) in evaluating music responses of special populations. Journal of the International Association of Music for the Handicapped, 6(2), 3–15.
31.
May, W. (1985). Musical style preferences and aural discrimination skills of primary grade school children. Journal of Research in Music Education, 32, 7–22.
32.
McCrary, J. (1993). Effects of listeners' and performers' race on music preferences. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 200–211.
33.
Moskovitz, E. (1992). The effect of repetition on tempo preferences of elementary children. Journal of Research in Music Education, 40, 193–203.
34.
Nakazawa, N. (1988). School music, environment, and music preferences: A comparison of Japanese students living in Japan and Japanese students living in the United States. Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 2575A.
35.
Price, H. (1986). A proposed glossary for use in affective response literature in music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 34, 151–159.
36.
Price, H., & Yarbrough, C. (1987). Expressed opinions of composer, musical training, recording ownership, and their interrelationships. In C. K Madsen & C. A. Prickett (Eds.), Applications of research in music behavior (pp. 232–243). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
37.
Robinson, C. R. (1988). Differentiated modes of choral performance evaluation using traditional procedures and a continuous response digital interface (Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University). Dissertation Abstracts International, 49 (10), 2859.
38.
Shehan, P. (1984). The effect of instruction method of preference, achievement, and attentiveness for Indonesian gamelan music. Psychology of Music, 12, 34–42.
39.
Shehan, P. (1985). Transfer of preference from taught to untaught pieces of non-Western music genres. Journal of Research in Music Education, 33, 149–158.
40.
Shehan, P. K. (1986). Towards tolerance and taste: Preferences for world musics. British Journal of Music Education, 3(2), 153–163.
41.
Volk, T M. (1993). The history and development of multicultural music education as evidenced in the Music Educators Journal, 1967-1992. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 137–155.
