The Effect of Conceptual Advancement in Jazz Music Selections and Jazz Experience on Musicians' Aesthetic Response

Abstract

This study is an investigation of what musicians consider to be their aesthetic experience with jazz music selections that vary in level of conceptual advancement (melodic complexity during improvised solos). Music major participants (N = 128) were assigned to either the jazz musician (n = 64) or nonjazz musician (n = 64) group. Data were gathered as participants manipulated the dial of a Continuous Response Digital Interface (CRDI) to indicate the magnitude of their aesthetic responses as they listened to four audio selections. Written responses were collected following each session via a questionnaire. Statistical analysis of group responses indicated a significant difference between the two participant groups only for the most conceptually advanced selection. An analysis of group graphs indicated that jazz musician participants rated this same selection higher. These findings suggest that greater instrumental jazz ensemble experience is related to greater aesthetic interest when listening to a jazz selection containing a high level of conceptual complexity.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams, B. L. (1994). The effect of visual/aural conditions on the emotional response to music. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Florida State University.

Aiello, R. (1994). Can listening to music be experimentally studied? In R. Aiello with J. Sloboda (Eds.), Musical perceptions. New York: Oxford University Press.

Berliner, P. F. (1994). Thinking in jazz: The infinite art of improvisation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

The Billboard's ‘all-time jazz greats.’ (1959, June 29). Billboard, 23.

Boyle, J. D. , & Radocy, R. E. (1987). Measurement and evaluation of musical experiences. New York: Schirmer.

Bharucha, J. (1994). Tonality and expectation. In R. Aiello with J. Sloboda (Eds.), Musical perceptions. New York: Oxford University Press.

Campbell, M. (1991). Musical learning and the development of psychological processes in perception and cognition. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 107, 35–48.

Davies, J. B. (1978). The psychology of music. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Downbeat 22nd annual readers' poll results. (1958, December 25). Downbeat, 14–26.

10.

Downbeat 23rd annual readers' poll results. (1959, December 24). Downbeat, 22–35.

11.

Frego, D. (1999). The effect of aural, visual, and aural/visual conditions on subjects' response to perceived artistic tension in music and dance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 47, 31–43.

12.

Gfeller, K. , Asmus, E. , & Eckert, M. (1991). An investigation of emotional response to music and text. Psychology of Music, 19 (2), 128–141.

13.

Gillespie, D. , & Fraser, A. (1979). To be or not to bop. New York: Da Capo Press.

14.

Gregory, D. (1994). Analysis of listening preferences of high school and college musicians. Journal of Research in Music Education, 42, 331–342.

15.

Gridley, M. C. (2003). Jazz styles: History and analysis (8th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

16.

Hargreaves, D.J. (1984). The effects of repetition on liking for music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 32, 36–46.

17.

Lychner, J. (1995). An empirical study concerning technology relating to aesthetic response to music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 303–319.

18.

Madsen, C. K. (1996). Empirical investigation of the “aesthetic response” to music: Musicians and non-musicians. In B. Pennycook & E. Costa-Giomi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition (pp. 103–110). Montreal: Mc Gill University.

19.

Madsen, C. K. (1990). Measuring musical response. Music Educators Journal, 77 (3), 26–28.

20.

Madsen, C. K. , Brittin, R. V. , & Capperella-Sheldon, D. A. (1993). An empirical investigation of the aesthetic response to music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 57–69.

21.

Madsen, C. K. , & Fredrickson, W. (1993). The experience of musical tension: A replication of Nielsen's research using the Continuous Response Digital Interface. Journal of Music Therapy, 30, 46–63.

22.

Madsen, C. K. , & Madsen, C. H. (1970). Experimental research in music. Engle-wood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

23.

Meyer, L. B. (1956). Emotion and meaning in music. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

24.

Misenhelter, D. , & Price, H. E. (2001). An examination of music and non-music majors' response to selected excerpts from Stravinsky's Le Sacre du printemps. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49, 323–329.

25.

Price, H. E. (1986). A proposed glossary for use in affective response literature in music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 34, 151–159.

26.

Shaffer, L. H. , & Todd, N. P. (1994). The interpretive component in musical performance. In R. Aiello with J. Sloboda (Eds.), Musical perceptions. New York: Oxford University Press.

27.

Sloboda, J. A. (1985). The musical mind: The cognitive psychology of music. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.

28.

Winer, B. , Brown, D. , & Michels, K. (1991). Statistical principles in experimental design (3rd ed.). New York: Mc Graw-Hill.