Pitch Labels with Single and Multiple Meanings: A Study with French-Speaking Children

Abstract

It has been suggested that English-speaking children have difficulty labeling pitch because of the multiple connotations of the terms “high” and “low.” In this study, we examined whether the use of single or multiple-meaning labels affects young children's identification of pitch changes. French-speaking children received instruction on the use of the single-meaning terms aigu and grave (which as a pair of opposite terms is only used to label high and low sounds) or the multiple-meaning words haut and bas (which as its English counterparts“high” and “low” are used to label pitch, space, and intensity). Children were asked to describe the instructor's high and low voice, strike a drum whenever they heard a two-octave pitch change in a melody, and label the melody's high and low fragments. Children identified most of the pitch changes of the melody and used the newly learned labels with a high degree of accuracy. Those who were taught the single-meaning terms labeled high and low stimuli more correctly than did those who were taught the multiple-meaning terms.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andrews, F. M. , & Diehl, N. C. (1970). Development of a technique for identifying elementary school children's musical concepts. Journal of Research in Music Education, 18, 214–222.

Flowers, P. J. , & Costa-Giomi, E. (1991). Verbal and nonverbal identification of pitch changes in a familiar song by English and Spanish speaking preschool children. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 101, 1–12.

Hair, H. I. (1981). Verbal identification of music concepts. Journal of Research in Music Education, 29,11–21.

Hair, H. I. (1987a). Children's responses to music stimuli: Verbal/nonverbal, and aural/visual modes. In C. K. Madsen & A. Prickett (Eds.), Applications of research in music behavior (pp. 59–70). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.

Hair, H. I. (1987b). Descriptive vocabulary and visual choices: Children's responses to conceptual changes in music. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 91, 59–64.

Johnson, C. J. (1992). Cognitive components of naming in children: Effects of referential uncertainty and stimulus realism. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 53, 45–71.

Johnson, C. J. , & Clark, J. M. (1988). Children's picture naming difficulty and errors: Effects of age of acquisition, uncertainty, and name generality. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 351–365.

McMahon, O . (1982). A comparison of language development and verbalization in response to auditory stimuli in pre-school age children [Special issue]. Psychology of Music, pp. 82–85.

Paivio, A. , Clark, J. M. , Digdon, N. , & Bons, T. (1989). Referential processing: Reciprocity and correlates of naming and imaging. Memory and Cognition, 17, 163–174.

10.

Scott, C. S. (1977). Pitch concept formulation in preschool children (Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, 1977). Dissertation Abstracts International, 38, 3133A. University Microfilms No. DBJ77–26865.

11.

Van Zee, N . (1976). Responses of kindergarten children to musical stimuli and terminology. Journal of Research in Music Education, 24, 14–21.

12.

Webster, P. R. , & Schlentrich, K. (1982). Discrimination of pitch direction by preschool children with verbal and nonverbal tasks. Journal of Research in Music Education, 30, 151–161.

13.

White, D. J. , Dale, P. S. , & Carlsen, J. C. (1990). Discrimination and categorization of pitch direction by young children. Psychomusicology, 9 (1), 39–58.

14.

Williams, D. B. (1990). Effects of music factors on second- and fifth-grade children's perception of melodic motion. Psychomusicology, 9 (1), 59–78.