This study is an investigation of several issues relating to teacher retention and attrition. In the spring of 1995, a questionnaire was sent to 225 certified teachers who had all finished a BME during the past 10 years and graduated from the same university. Results indicated that of the senders of 137 returned responses, 24 (17.5%) had chosen not to teach at that time. Specific questions concerned demographic data including years of teaching, area of specialization, amount of professional development, and especially the degree of perceived support received from administration, school, and parents. Retention of this same sample was investigated 6 years later, indicating that 34.4% of the individuals were no longer teaching at the K-college level, well below the average rate of attrition for teachers in other subject areas. Music teachers remaining in the field in 2001 held more positions prior to 1995 than those no longer teaching and regularly participated in professional development activities. Subjects' comments revealed that personal reasons and administrative support concerns were given as the primary rationale for discontent with the education profession. Analysis of gender patterns revealed that women and men leave the profession at different times during the first 10 years of their careers. Implications for teacher training as well as areas of further research are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Asmus, E. (2000). The need for research in music teacher preparation. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 10 (1), 5.
2.
Bidner, S. (2001). Reform in music teacher preparation. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 10 (2), 3–4.
3.
Breidenstein, A. L. (1999). Four year and extended program graduates: Perceptions of their teacher education and teaching experiences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.
4.
Bridges, M. S. (1993). What our graduates wish we had told them. Quarterly Journal of Music Teaching and Learning, 4 (1), 68–72.
5.
Colwell, R. J. (1985). Program evaluation in music teacher education. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 81, 18–64.
6.
Conway, C. M. (2001, February). Teacher preparation evaluation through the eyes of new teachers. Paper presented at the Northwest Division Conference of MENC-The National Association for Music Education, Spokane, WA.
7.
Davis, K. J. (1999). A study of beginning teachers' perceptions regarding their teacher preparatory programs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.
8.
Fields, J. S. (1999). Harmony, cacophony, and melody: Voices supporting and informing the practice of beginning teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia.
9.
Griffin, G. A. (Ed.). (1999). The education of teachers.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
10.
Holmes Group. (1996). The Holmes trilogy. East Lansing, MI: Holmes Group.
11.
Holmes Partnership. (2001). Origins of the Holmes partnership (1987–1997). [Web site: www.holmespartnership.org]
12.
Leglar, M. A. (1993). A profile of research in music teacher education. Quarterly Journal of Music Teaching and Learning, 4 (1), 59–67.
13.
Lehman, P. R. (1992). Curriculum and program evaluation. In R. Colwell (Ed.), Handbook of research on music teaching and learning (pp. 281–294). New York: Schirmer Books.
14.
National Association of Schools of Music. (1999). National Association of Schools of Music 1999–2000 handbook. Reston, VA: Author.
15.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
16.
Schwartz, H. (1996). The changing nature of teacher education. In J. Sikula, T.J. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed.) (pp. 2–13). New York: Macmillan.
17.
Seidman, I. E. (1991). Interviewing as qualitative research.New York: Teachers College Press.
18.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research.London: Sage.
19.
Stewart-Wells, A. G. (2000). An investigation of student teacher and teacher educator perceptions of their teacher education program and of the role classroom management plays or should play inpreservice education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Claremont Graduate University.
20.
Beaty, E. (1953). Developing criteria for the selection of directing teachers with particular reference to a secondary program of off-campus internship at Florida State University. Dissertation Abstracts International, 13–05, 0698.
21.
Bergee, M.J. (1992). Certain attitudes toward occupational status held by music education majors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 40, 104–113.
22.
Bobbit, S. A., Faupel, E. & Burns, S. (1991). Characteristics of stayers, movers, and leavers: Results from the Teacher Follow-Up Survey: 1988–89.Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
23.
Bobbit, S. A., Leich, M. C., Whitener, S. D., & Lynch, H. R. (1994). Characteristics of stayers, movers, and leavers: Results from the Teacher Follow-up Survey: 1991–92.Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
24.
Boe, E. E., Bobbit, S. A., Cook, L. H., Whitener, S. D., & Weber, A. L. (1996). Predictors of retention, transfer, and attrition of special and general education teachers: Data from the 1989 Teacher Follow-Up Survey.Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
25.
Brown, A., & Alley, J. M. (1983). Multivariate analysis of degree persistence of undergraduate music education majors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 31, 271–281.
26.
Cassidy, J. W. (1990). Effect of intensity training on preservice teachers' instruction accuracy and delivery effectiveness. Journal of Research in Music Education, 38, 164–174.
27.
Chapman, D. W. (1984). Teacher retention: The test of a model. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 645–658.
28.
Chapman, D. W., & Green, M. S. (1986). Teacher retention: A further examination. Journal of Educational Research, 79 (5), 273–279.
29.
Chapman, D. W., & Hutchenson, S. M. (1982). Attrition from teaching careers: A discriminant analysis. American Journal of Educational Research, 19, 93–105.
30.
Coxe, B. (Ed.) (1999). Teacher preparation program.Tallahassee: Florida Department of Education.
31.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1984). Beyond the commission reports: The coming crisis in teaching.Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
32.
Hamann, D. L., Daugherty, E., & Mills, C. R. (1987). An investigation of burnout assessment and potential job related variables among public school music educators. Psychology of Music, 15 (2), 128–140.
33.
Hamilton, M. W. (1953). An evaluation of the Florida State University internship program. Dissertation Abstracts International, 13–06, 1100.
34.
Henke, R. R., Choy, S. P., Geis, S., & Broughman, S. (1996). Schools and staffing in the United States: A statistical profile, 1993–94.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (NCES 96–124).
35.
Heyns, B. (1988). Educational defectors: A first look at teacher attrition in the NLS-72. Educational Researcher, 17, 24–32.
36.
Ingersoll, R. M. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38 (3), 499–534.
37.
Jellison, J., & Wolfe, D. (1987). Verbal training effects on teaching units: An exploratory study of music teaching antecedents and consequents. In C. K. Madsen & C. A. Prickett (Eds.), Applications of research in music behavior (pp. 135–148). Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press.
38.
Karge, B. D. (1993). Beginning teachers: In danger of attrition. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, National Center for Education Statistics, Atlanta, GA.
39.
Kuhn, T. L. (1972). The effect of teacher approval and disapproval on attentiveness, musical achievement, and attitude of fifth grade students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee.
40.
Krueger, P.J. (2000). Beginning music teachers: Will they leave the profession?Update, 19(1), 22–26.
41.
Madsen, C. K. (Ed.) (2000). Vision 2020: The Housewright Symposium on Music Education.Reston, VA: MENC: The National Association for Music Education.
42.
Madsen, C. K., & Duke, R. A. (1993). Selection and development of prospective music teachers. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 3 (1), 5–11.
43.
Madsen, C. H., Jr., & Madsen, C. K. (1998). Teaching/Discipline: A positive approach for educational development.4th ed.Raleigh, NC: Contemporary Publishing.
44.
Madsen, C. K., Standley, J. M., & Cassidy, J. W. (1989). Demonstration and recognition of high/low contrasts in teacher intensity. Journal of Research in Music Education, 37, 85–92.
45.
Madsen, C. K., & Yarbrough, C. (1985). Competency-based music education.Raleigh, NC: Contemporary Publishing.
46.
Merrow, J. (1999, October 6). The teacher shortage: Wrong diagnosis, phony cures. Education Week, 19 (6), Retrieved August 29, 2001, from http://www.edweek.org/ew/ew_printstory.cfm?slug=06merrow.h 19.
47.
Moore, R., & Kuhn, T. (1974). The effect of different behavioral techniques on teaching and musicianship skills of prospective elementary teachers: Six studies. In C. K Madsen, R. D. Greer, & C. H. Madsen, Jr. (Eds.), Research in music behavior: Modifying music behavior in the classroom (pp. 56–65). New York: Teachers College Press.
48.
Plomis-Devick, E. (1983). A study of the career development patterns of music education majors at the Florida State University. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee.
49.
Price, H. E. (1992). Sequential patterns of music instruction and learning to use them. Journal of Research in Music Education, 40, 14–29.
50.
Shen, J. (1997). Teacher retention and attrition in public schools: Evidence from SASS91. Journal of Educational Research, 91, 81–88.
51.
Theobald, N. D. (1990). An examination of the influence of personal, professional, and school district characteristics on public school teacher retention. Economics of Education Review, 9, 241–250.
52.
Whitener, S. D., Gruber, K., Lynch, H., Tingos, K., & Fondelier, S. (1997). Characteristics of stayers, movers, and leavers: Results from the Teacher Follow up Survey 1994–95 (NCES 97–450). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
