Amabile has proposed that the most valid way to measure creativity is by using experts' subjective assessment of creative products—a technique she has labeled “consensual assessment.” The purpose of this study was to test the reliability of the consensual assessment technique on children's musical compositions and to determine which group of judges provides the most reliable ratings of creativity for music compositions of fourth- and fifth-grade children. The groups that were compared were music teachers, composers, theorists, seventh-grade children, and second-grade children. The interjudge reliabilities for each groups creativity ratings on 11 children's musical compositions were: composers, .04; all music teachers, .64; music theorists, .73; seventh-grade children, .61; and second-grade children, .50. Significant correlations were found between the music teachers and music theorists, and between the two groups of children. There were very weak or negative correlations between the composers' scores and the scores of the other groups.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Albert, R. S. (1996). Some reasons why childhood creativity often fails to make it past puberty into the real world. In M. A. Runco (ed.), Creativity from childhood through adulthood: The developmental issues (pp. 43–56). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
2.
Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43 (5), 997–1013.
3.
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity.New York: Springer-Verlag.
4.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context.Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
5.
Amchin, R. A. (1996). Creative musical response: The effects of teacher-student interaction on the improvisation abilities of fourth- and fifth-grade students. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, 1995). Dissertation Abstracts International, 56/08, 3044A.
6.
Baltzer, S. (1990). A factor analytic study of musical creativity in children in the primary grades. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.
7.
Bangs, R. L. (1992). An application of Amabile's model of creativity to music instruction: A comparison of motivational strategies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida.
8.
Brinkman, D. (1999). Problem finding, creativity style and musical compositions of high school students. Journal of Creative Behavior, 33 (1), 62–68.
9.
Brown, R. T. (1989). Creativity. What are we to measure? In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–32). New York: Plenum Press.
10.
Daignault, L. (1997). Children's creative musical thinking within the context of a computer-supported improvisational approach to composition. (Doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, 1996). Dissertation Abstracts International, 57, 4681A.
11.
Gardner, H. (1982). Art, mind, and brain. A cognitive approach to creativity.New York: Basic Books, Inc.
12.
Gorder, W. D. (1976). An investigation of divergent production abilities as constructs of musical creativity. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1976). Dissertation Abstracts International, 37 (1), 177A.
13.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence.New York: Mc Graw-Hill.
14.
Guilford, J. P., Merrifield, P. R., & Wilson, R. C. (1958) Unusual Uses Test.Orange, CA: Sheridan Psychological Services.
15.
Hickey, M. (1995). Qualitative and quantitative relationships between children's creative musical thinking processes and products. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
16.
Hickey, M. (1996, December). Consensual assessment of children's musical compositions. Unpublished paper presented at the Research Poster Presentation, New York State School Music Association Convention.
17.
Hickey, M., & Webster, P. (1995). Rating scales and their use in assessing children's compositions. The Quarterly Journal of Music Teaching and Learning, 6 (4), 28–44.
18.
Holliger, Y (1989). An investigative study on developing divergent thinking responses in children using a cognitive approach in music education. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University Teachers College, 1987). Dissertation Abstracts International, 49 (9), 2574A.
19.
Josuweit, D. (1992). The effects of an audiation based instrumental music curriculum upon beginning band students' achievement in music creativity. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple University, May, 1991).
20.
Keegan, R. T. (1996). Creativity from childhood to adulthood: A difference of degree and not of kind. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Creativity from childhood through adulthood: The developmental issues (pp. 57–66). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
21.
Moore, B. R. (1990). The relationship between curriculum and learner: music composition and learning style. Journal of Research in Music Education, 38, 24–38.
22.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: Mc Graw-Hill.
23.
Perkins, D. N. (1988). The possibility of invention. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 362–385). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Plucker, J. A., & Renzulli, J. S. (1999). Psychometric approaches to the study of human creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 35–61). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Plucker, J. A. & Runco, M. A. (1998). The death of creativity measurement has been greatly exaggerated: Current issues, recent advances, and future directions in creativity assessment. Roeper Review, 21 (1), p. 36–39.
26.
Priest, T. L. (1997). Fostering creative and critical thinking in a beginning instrumental music class. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
27.
Runco, M. A., Mc Carthy, K. A., & Svenson, E. (1994). Judgments of the creativity of artwork from students and professional artists. The Journal of Psychology, 128(1), 23–31.
28.
Runco, M. A., & Charles, R. E. (1997). Developmental trends in creative performance. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), The creativity research handbook. Volume I (pp. 115–152). Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
29.
Schmidt, C., & Sinor, J. (1986). An investigation of the relationships among music audiation, musical creativity, and cognitive style. Journal of Research in Music Education, 34, 160–172.
30.
Torrance, E. P. (1974). The Torrance tests of creative thinking: Technical-norms manual.Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Services.
31.
Torrance, E. P. (1981). Thinking creatively in action and movement: Administration, scoring, testing manual.Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service, Inc.
32.
Vaughan, M. (1971). Music as model and metaphor in the cultivation and measurement of creative behavior in children (doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia). Dissertation Abstracts International, 32 (10), 5833A.
33.
Vaughan, M. (1977). Musical creativity: Its cultivation and measurement. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 50, 72–77.
34.
Vold, J. N. (1986). A study of musical problem solving behavior in kindergarten children and a comparison with other aspects of creative behavior (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama).
35.
Webster, P. (1977). A factor of intellect approach to creative thinking in music. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Eastman School of Music, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
36.
Webster, P. (1987). Refinement of a measure of creative thinking in music. In C. Madsen and C. Prickett (Eds.), Applications of research in music behavior (pp. 257–271). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
37.
Webster, P. (1990, March). Study of internal reliability for the Measure of Creative Thinking in Music (MCTM). Paper presented at the General Poster Session of the National Biennial In-Service Conference of Music Educators National Conference, Washington, DC.
38.
Webster, P. (1994). Measure of Creative Thinking in Music-II (MCTM-II). Administrative Guidelines. Unpublished manuscript, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
39.
Webster, P., Yale, C., & Haefner, M. (1988, April). Test-Retest reliability of Measures of Creative Thinking in Music for children with formal music training. Paper presented at the poster session, 1988 MENC National In-Service Meeting, Indianapolis, IN.
