Effects of Tone-Quality Changes on Intonation and Tone-Quality Ratings of High School and College Instrumentalists

Abstract

We investigated the effects of variations in tone quality on listeners' perception of both tone quality and intonation. University music and nonmusic major instrumentalists and high school students participating in instrumental ensembles served as listeners (N = 116). High-quality digital samples of clarinet, trumpet, and trombone tones were used. The original tone quality of each instrument was manipulated to produce experimental stimuli of “bright” and “dark” relative to the unaltered tone quality. Results indicated that the more inexperienced instrumentalists rated stimuli that were relatively “brighter' in tone quality as sharper in intonation, and conversely, stimuli of relatively ”darker' tone quality were judged to be flatter in intonation. For the brass instruments, listeners judged the unaltered and bright tones as better in tone quality than tones that were relatively dark. However, for the clarinet tones, the bright tone quality was judged to be worse than unaltered or dark-quality stimuli.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bergee, M. J. (1995). Primary and higher-order factors in a scale assessing concert band performance. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 126, 1–14.

Cassidy, J. W. (1989). The effect of instrument type, stimulus timbre, and stimulus octave placement on tuning accuracy. Missouri Journal of Research in Music Education, 26, 7–23.

Crowder, R. G. (1989). Imagery for musical timbre. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 472–478.

Ely, M. C. (1992). Effects of timbre on college woodwind players' intonational performance and perception. Journal of Research in Music Education, 40, 158–167.

Garner, W. R. (1974). The processing of information and structure. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.

Geringer, J. M. , & Madsen, C. K. (1981). Verbal and operant discrimination/preference for tone quality and intonation. Psychology of Music, 9, 2–30.

Geringer, J. M. , & Madsen, C. K. (1989). Pitch and tone quality discrimination and preference: Evidence for a hierarchical model of musical elements. Canadian Music Educator: Special Research Edition, 30, 29–38.

Greer, R. D. (1970). The effect of timbre on brass-wind intonation. Experimental Research in Music: Studies in the Psychology of Music, 6, 65–94.

Helmholtz, H. von (1954). On the sensations of tone ( A. J. Ellis , Trans.). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1877)

10.

Kohut, D. (1973). Instrumental music pedagogy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

11.

Krumhansl, C. L. , & Iverson, P. (1992). Perceptual interactions between musical pitch and timbre. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 739–751.

12.

Madsen, C. K. , & Flowers, P. J. (1981). Effect of tuning in an attempt to compensate for pitch/quality errors in flute/oboe duets. Contributions to Music Education, 5, 2–9.

13.

Madsen, C. K. , & Geringer, J. M. (1976). Preferences for trumpet tone quality versus intonation. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 46, 13–22.

14.

Madsen, C. K. , & Geringer, J. M. (1981). Discrimination between tone quality and intonation in unaccompanied flute/oboe duets. Journal of Research in Music Education, 29, 305–313.

15.

Melara, R. D. , & Marks, L. E. (1990). Interaction among auditory dimensions: Timbre, pitch, and loudness. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 169–178.

16.

Moore, B. C. , Glasberg, B. R. , & Proctor, G. M. (1992). Accuracy of pitch matching for pure tones and for complex tones with overlapping or non-overlapping harmonics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 3443–3450.

17.

Opolko, F. , & Wapnick, J. (Producers). (1987). McGill University master samples [Compact disc]. Montreal, Quebec: McGill University.

18.

Pitt, M. A. (1994). Perception of pitch and timbre by musically trained and untrained listeners. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 976–986.

19.

Plomp, R. (1966). Pitch of complex tones. In Experiments on tone perception. New York, NY: Academic Press.

20.

Plomp, R. (1976). Aspects of tone sensation. New York: Academic Press.

21.

Rasch, J. C. , & Plomp, R. (1982). The perception of musical tones. In Deutsch, D. (Ed.), The psychology of music. New York: Academic Press.

22.

Singh, P. G. , & Hirsh, I.J. (1992). Influence of spectral locus and F0 changes on the pitch and timbre of complex tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 2650–2661.

23.

Swaffield, W. R. (1974). Effect of melodic parameters on ability to make fine-tuning responses in context. Journal of Research in Music Education, 22, 305–312.

24.

Thomson, J. (1995). Teaching with goals, not answers: An interview with John Whitwell. The Instrumentalist, 50 (5), 10–15.

25.

Wapnick, J. , & Freeman, P. (1980). Effects of dark-bright timbral variation on the perception of flatness and sharpness. Journal of Research in Music Education, 28, 176–184.