Participation in an expressive ensemble may be inappropriately presumed to produce expressive independence in individual ensemble members. This study is an examination of relationships between individual expressive achievement and (a) the expressive achievement of choral ensembles, (b) technical performance, and (c) musical background. Subjects included 11 high school choral ensembles and 82 individual ensemble members. A multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) revealed no significant relationships between individual and ensemble expressive achievement. Cor-relations showed technical and expressive performance to be strongly related. Significantly related musical background factors from a MANOVA included: (a) involvement in outside performing groups, (b) semesters of high school choir, (c) private vocal lessons, and (d) age of first private lessons. The study provided grounds for questioning the assumption that expressive ensembles yield expressive individuals.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Carpenter, R. A. (1988). A descriptive analysis of relationships between verbal behaviors of teacher-conductors and rating of selected junior and senior high school band rehearsals. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 7(1) 37–40.
2.
Cherubini, L. (1987). “Like as a Father” (Arranged by John Kingsbury). Bryn Mawr, PA: Theodore Presser Co.
3.
Colwell, R. (1963). An investigation of musical achievement among vocal students, vocal-instrumental students, and instrumental students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 11, 123–130.
4.
Consortium of National Arts Education Associations. (1994). National standards for arts education. Reston, VA: MENC.
5.
Cooksey, J. (1977). A facet-factorial approach to rating high school choral music performance. Journal of Research in Music Education. 25, 100–113.
6.
Crick, J. E., & Brennan, R. L. (1983). Manual of GENOVA. (ACT Technical Bulletin, no. 43). Iowa City, IA: The American College Testing Program.
7.
Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.
8.
Demorest, S. M. (1998). Improving sight-singing performance in the choral ensemble: The effect of individual testing. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 182–192.
9.
Demorest, S. M., & May, W. V. (1995). Sight-singing instruction in the choral ensemble: Factors related to individual performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 43, 156–167.
10.
Elliott, D. (1987). Assessing musical performance. British Journal of Music Education, 4, 157–183.
11.
Elliott, D.J. (1995). Music matters.New York: Oxford University Press.
12.
Folstrom, R.J. (1967). A comparative study of the musical achievement of students in three Illinois high schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
13.
Frakes, L. (1986). Differences in music achievement, academic achievement, and attitude among participants, dropouts, and nonparticipants in secondary school music (Review by Rudolf E. Radocy). Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 89, 45–49.
14.
Gabrielsson, A. (1974). Performance of rhythmic patterns. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 15, 63–72.
15.
Gabrielsson, A. (1987). Once again: The theme from Mozart's Piano Sonata in A major (K. 331). In A. Gabrielsson, (Ed.), Action and perception in rhythm and music (pp. 81–103). Stockholm: Royal Swedish Academy of Music, No. 55.
16.
Henry, M., & Demorest, S. M. (1994). Individual sight-singing achievement in successful choral ensembles: A preliminary study. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 13 (1), 4–8.
17.
Hevner, K. (1936). Experimental studies of the elements of expression in music. American Journal of Psychology, 48, 246–268.
18.
Hoffren, J. (1964). The construction and validation of a test of expressive phrasing in music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 12, 159–164.
19.
Marchand, D.J. (1970). A study of two approaches to the development of expressive performance within the context of a college music fundamentals class (Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1970). Dissertation Abstracts International, 31, 5940.
20.
May, W. V. & Elliott, C. A. (1980). Relationships among ensemble participation, private instruction, and aural skill development. Journal of Research in Music Education, 28, 155–161.
21.
Menchaca, L. A. (1988). A descriptive analysis of secondary instrumental conductor rehearsal problem-solving approaches, addressed music elements and relationship to student attitude. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
22.
Mills, J. (1987). Assessment of solo musical performance—A preliminary study. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 91, 119–125.
23.
National Federation of State High School Associations. (1980). National Federation Official Ballot—Large Group. Kansas City, MO: Author.
24.
Osgood, C. E. (1952). The nature and measurement of meaning. Psychological Bulletin, 49, 197.
25.
Povel, D. (1977). Temporal structure of performed music: Some preliminary observations. Acta Psychologica, 41, 309–320.
26.
Reimer, B. (1970). A philosophy of music education.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
27.
Repp, B. H. (1992). A constraint on the expressive timing of a melodic gesture: Evidence from performance and aesthetic judgement. Music Perception, 10, 221–242.
28.
Repp, B. H. (1996). Pedal timing and tempo in expressive piano performance: A preliminary investigation. Psychology of Music, 24, 199–221.
29.
Seashore, C. E. (1938). Psychology of music.New York: Mc Graw-Hill.
30.
Shaffer, L. H. (1981). Performances of Chopin, Bach, and Bartok: Studies in motor programming. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 326–376.
31.
Shaffer, L. H., & Todd, N. P. (1987). The interpretive component in musical performance. In A. Gabrielsson (Ed.), Action and perception in rhythm and music (pp. 139–151). Stockholm: Royal Swedish Academy of Music, No. 55.
32.
Sidoti, V. J. (1990). The effects of expressive and nonexpressive conducting on the performance accuracy of selected expression marking by individual high school instrumentalists. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
33.
Steinberg, R., & Raith, L. (1985). II. Assessment of musical expression. Psychopathology, 18, 265–173.
34.
Sundberg, J. (1988). Computer synthesis of music performance. In J. A. Sloboda (Ed.), Generative processes in music: The psychology of performance, improvisation, and composition (pp. 52–69). Oxford, UK/New York: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.
35.
Sundberg, J. & Fryden, L. (1985). Teaching a computer to play melodies musically. Analytical Studies in the descriptions and analysis of music in honour ofIngmar Bengtsson (pp. 67–76). Publications issued by the Royal Swedish Academy of Music, No. 47.
36.
Sundberg, J., Askenfelt, A. & Fryden, L. (1983). Musical performance: A synthesis-by-rule approach. Computer Music Journal, 7, 37–43.
37.
Sundberg, J., Fryden, L., & Askenfelt, A. (1983). What tells you the player is musical? An analysis-by-synthesis study of music performance. In J. Sundberg (Ed.), Studies of music performance (pp. 61–67). Stockholm: Royal Swedish Academy of Music, No. 39.
38.
Tait, M., & Haack, P. (1984). Principles and processes of music education.New York: Columbia University, Teachers College Press.
39.
Thompson, W. R., Sundberg, J., Friberg, A., & Fryden, L. (1989). The use of rules for expression in the performance of melodies. [Special issue: Performance and stress]. Psychology of Music, 17 (1), 63–82.
40.
Thurman, V. L. (1977). A frequency and time description of selected rehearsal behaviors used by five choral conductors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana.
41.
Tucker, D. W. (1969). Factors related to musical reading ability of senior high school students participating in choral groups. (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 1969). Dissertation Abstracts International, 31, 2427A.
42.
Windsor, W. L., & Clarke, E. F. (1997). Expressive timing and dynamics in real and artificial musical performances: Using an algorithm as an analytical tool. Music Perception, 15, 127–152.
43.
Zimmerman, R. C. (1962). Relationship of musical environment to choral sight reading ability. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, 1962.)Dissertation Abstracts International, 24, 1198–1199.
