Relationships between Perceptions of Conducting Effectiveness and Ensemble Performance

Abstract

Conducting is a complex art that involves, among other things, effective nonverbal communication. While this communication includes hand and arm gestures as well as eye contact and facial expression, it also encompasses nonverbal messages sent by the rest of a conductor's body, such as his/her physical appearance. Assumptions based on what conductors look like and how well they fit the stereotypical role they are portraying often affect opinions of their job performance. Thus, the nonverbal messages sent by a conductor's physical appearance could affect ensemble members' opinions of him or her as a conductor. Therefore, this study attempted to investigate whether perceptions of a conductor's body type were a factor when judging the conductor and ensemble performances. Furthermore, relationships between ensemble performance ratings and the conductor's visual appearance characteristics (eye contact, facial expression, and posture), evaluator confidence in the conductor, and overall conductor effectiveness were explored. Neither the conductor's body type nor the gender or college major of the evaluator affected ratings of the conductor and ensemble performances. However, performance ratings were affected when the conductors were viewed in a certain order. There were moderate to moderately strong relationships between the performance ratings and conductor posture, conductor facial expression, evaluator's confidence in the conductor, and overall conducting effectiveness. Eye contact, however, was not strongly related to performance ratings.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson, R. , & Nida, S. A. (1978). Effect of physical attractiveness on opposite- and same-sex evaluations. Journal of Personality, 46, 401–413.

Byo, J. L. (1990). Recognition of intensity contrasts in gestures of beginning conductors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 38, 157–163.

Clifford, M. M. , & Walster, E. (1973). Research note: The effect of physical attractiveness on teacher expectations. Sociology of Education, 46, 248–258.

Drag, R. M. , & Shaw, M. E. (1967). Factors influencing the communication of emotional intent by facial expressions. Psychonomic Science, 8 (4), 137–138.

Fredrickson, W E. . Johnson, C. M. , & Robinson, C. R. (1998). The effect of pre-conducting and conducting behaviors on the evaluation of conductor competence. Journal of Band Research, 33 (2), 1–13.

Garretson, R. L. (1993). Conducting choral music (7th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Gibson J.J. , & Pick, A. D. (1963). Perceptions of another person's looking behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 76, 386–394.

Green, E A. H. (1997). The modern conductor (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Gurwitz, S. B. , & Dodge, K. A. (1977). Effects of confirmations and disconfirmations on stereotyped-based attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35 (7), 495–500.

10.

Johnson, C. M. , Fredrickson, W. E. , Achey, C. A. , & Gentry, G. (2000, March). The effect of nonverbal elements of conducting on the overall evaluation of student and professional conductors. Poster session presented at the National Biennial In-Service Conference of MENC: The National Association for Music Education, Washington, DC.

11.

Julian, F. D. (1989). Nonverbal communication: Its application to conducting. Journal of Band Research, 24 (2), 49–54.

12.

Price, H. E. , & Winters, S. (1991). Effect of strict and expressive conducting on performances and opinions of eighth-grade band students . Journal of Band Research, 27 (1), 30–43.

13.

Rosenthal, R. , Hall, J. A. , Di Matteo, M. R. , Rogers, P. L. , & Archer, D. (1979). Sensitivity to nonverbal communication: The PONS test. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

14.

Robinson, C. R. (2000, March). Choral students' assessments of novice choral conductors. Poster session presented at the National Biennial In-Service Conference of MENC: The National Association for Music Education, Washington, DC.

15.

Strongman, K. T. , & Hart, C.J. (1968). Stereotyped reactions to body build. Psychological Reports, 23, 1175–1178.

16.

Tajfel, H. , & Billig, M. (1974). Familiarity and categorization in intergroup behavior, fournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 159–170.

17.

Wapnick, J. , Darrow, A. A. , Kovacs, J. , & Dalrymple, L. (1997). Effects of physical attractiveness on evaluation of vocal performance, fournal of Research in Music Education, 45, 470–479.

18.

Wapnick, J. , Mazza, J. K. , & Darrow, A. A. (1998). Effects of performer attractiveness, stage behavior, and dress on violin performance evaluation. fournal of Research in Music Education, 46, 510–521.

19.

Wapnick, J. , Mazza, J. K. , & Darrow, A. A. (2000, March). Effects of performer attractiveness, stage behavior, and dress on evaluation of children s piano performances. Poster session presented at the National Biennial In-Service Conference of MENC: The National Association for Music Education, Washington, DC.

20.

Widgery, R. N. , & Webster, B. (1969). The effects of physical attractiveness upon perceived initial credibility. Michigan Speech fournal, 4, 9–15.

21.

Yarbrough, C. (1975). Effects of magnitude of conductor behavior on students in selected mixed choruses, fournal of Research in Music Education, 23, 134–146.