Effects of Aural and Visual Conditions on Response to Perceived Artistic Tension in Music and Dance

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of aural, visual, and combined aural/visual conditions on the emotional response to music and dance of musicians and nonmusicians. Measurement was recorded on the perceived amount of artistic tension occurring in three stimuli. Subjects were randomly assigned to three experimental groups: aural-only, visual-only, and combined aural/visual. Stimuli used for the experimental conditions were three dance excerpts. Subjects were asked to indicate degrees of perceived artistic tension by manipulating a Continuous Response Digital Interface (CRDI) dial during experimental conditions. Additional data were gathered using a questionnaire. Results indicated no significant differences in perceived artistic tension between musicians and nonmusicians. Additionally, no differences were found in perceived artistic tension among the responses to the three experimental conditions. Subjects responded similarly regardless of whether they had previously considered the existence of artistic tension. A significant difference occurred in subject response to each of the three stimuli.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams, B. L (1994). The effect of visual/aural conditions on the emotional response to music (Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, 1994). Dissertation Abstracts International, 55, 08-A.

Brittin, R. V. , & Duke, R. A. (1997). Continuous and summative evaluation of intensity in music: A comparison of two methods for measuring overall effect. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 245–258.

Byrnes, S. R (1996). The effect of audio, video, and paired audio-video stimuli on the experience of stress. Journal of Music Therapy, 33 (4), 248–260.

Caplan, E. , & Cunningham, M. (1987). Points in space [Videotape]. London: British Broadcasting Corporation.

Copeland, R. , & Cohen, M. (1983). The dance medium. In R Copeland & M. Cohen (Eds.), What is dance? (pp. 103–110). New York: Oxford University Press.

Cunningham, M. (1985). The dancer and the dance. New York: Marion Boyars.

Fredrickson, W. E. (1995). A comparison of perceived musical tension and aesthetic response. Psychology of Music, 23 (1), 81–87.

Geringer, J. M. , Cassidy, J. W. , & Byo, J. L. (1996). Effects of music with video on responses of nonmusic majors: An exploratory study. Journal of Research in Music Education, 44, 240–251.

Geringer, J. M. , & Madsen, C. K. (1995). Focus of attention to elements: Listening patterns of musicians and nonmusicians. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, no. 127, 80–87.

10.

Gray, J. T. (1993). Aesthetic judgements of biological motion: The role of visual information and expertise (Doctoral dissertation, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 1993). Dissertation Abstracts International 53, 08-B.

11.

Johansson, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 14 (2), 201–211.

12.

Johnson, C. M. (1991). Use of the Continuous Response Digital Interface in evaluation of auditory versus auditory and visual aspects of musical performance. Southeastern Journal of Music Education, 3, 97–108.

13.

Kinberg, J. , & Grimm, T. (1985). Balanchine and Cunningham: An evening at the American Ballet Theater [Videotape]. Washington, DC: Public Broadcasting Service.

14.

Kinberg, J. , & Grimm, T. (1986). Mark Morris [Videotape]. Washington, DC: Public Broadcasting Service.

15.

Langer, S. K (1979). Philosophy in a new key: A study in the symbolism of reason, rite, and art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

16.

LeBlanc, A. (1988). The culture as educator: Elements in the development of individual music preference. In J. T. Gates (Ed.), Music education in the United States (pp. 33–65). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.

17.

Lychner, J. A. (1998). An empirical study concerning terminology relating to aesthetic response to music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 303–319.

18.

Madsen, C. K. , & Fredrickson, W. E. (1993). The experience of musical tension: A replication of Nielsen's research using the continuous response digital interface. Journal of Music Therapy, 30 (1), 46–63.

19.

Madsen, C. K. , Legette, R. M. , & Duke, R. A. (1993). Visual and aural aspects of listening to music: An exploratory study. Unpublished manuscript.

20.

Meyer, L. B. (1956). Emotion and meaning in music. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

21.

Nielsen, F. V. (1983). The experience of musical tension. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.

22.

Nielsen, F. V. (1987). Musical tension and related concepts. In T. A. Sebeok & J. Umiker-Sebeok (Eds.), The semiotic web '86: An international yearbook (pp. 491–513). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

23.

Prince, W. F (1972). A paradigm for research on music listening. Journal of Research in Music Education, 20, 445–455.

24.

Runeson, S. (1985). Perceiving people through their movements. In anonymous, Individual differences in movement (pp. 43–66). Lancaster, UK: MTP Press Limited.

25.

Runeson, S. , & Frykholm, G. (1983). Kinematic specifications of dynamics as an informational basis for person-and-action perception: Expectation, gender recognition, and deceptive intention. Journal of Psychology: General, 112 (4), 585–615.

26.

Scully, D. M. (1986). Visual perception of technical execution and aesthetic quality in biological motion. Human Movement Science, 5, 185–206.

27.

Sheets, M. (1966). The pheomnomenology of dance. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

28.

Sheldon, D. A. (1994). Effects of tempo, musical experience, and listening modes on tempo modulation perception. Journal of Research in Music Education, 42, 190–202.