In this paper, we challenge the traditional understanding of organizational routines as creating inertia in organizations. We adapt Latour's distinction between ostensive and performative to build a theory that explains why routines are a source of change as well as stability. The ostensive aspect of a routine embodies what we typically think of as the structure. The performative aspect embodies the specific actions, by specific people, at specific times and places, that bring the routine to life. We argue that the ostensive aspect enables people to guide, account for, and refer to specific performances of a routine, and the performative aspect creates, maintains, and modifies the ostensive aspect of the routine. We argue that the relationship between ostensive and performative aspects of routines creates an on-going opportunity for variation, selection, and retention of new practices and patterns of action within routines and allows routines to generate a wide range of outcomes, from apparent stability to considerable change. This revised ontology of organizational routines provides a better explanation of empirical findings than existing theories of routines and has implications for a wide range of organizational theories.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbbottA.1992“From causes to events: Notes on narrative positivism.”Sociological Methods and Research, 20: 428–455.
2.
AdlerP. S.GoldoftasB.LevineD. I.1999“Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system.”Organization Science, 10: 43–68.
AllisonG. T.1971Essence of Decision. Boston: Little, Brown.
5.
ArgoteL.1999Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
6.
ArrowK. J.1974The Limits of Organization. New York: Norton.
7.
AshforthB. E.FriedY.1988“The mindlessness of organizational behaviors.”Human Relations, 41: 305–329.
8.
BarleyS. R.1986“Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from the observation of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 31: 78–108.
9.
BarleyS. R.1990“Images of imaging: Notes on doing longitudinal fieldwork.”Organization Science, 1: 220–247.
10.
BaumJ. A. C.SinghJ. V. (eds.) 1994Evolutionary Dynamics in Organizations. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
BergerP.LuckmannT.1966The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Doubleday.
12.
BlauP.1955The Dynamics of Bureaucracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
BourdieuP.1977Outline of a Theory of Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
14.
BourdieuP.1990The Logic of Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
15.
BravermanH.1974Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. New York: Monthly Review Press.
16.
BurgelmanR. A.1994“Fading memories: A process theory of strategic business exit in dynamic environments.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 24–56.
17.
BurawoyM.1979Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labor Process under Monopoly Capital. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
CampbellD. T.1965“Variation and selective retention in socio-cultural evolution.” In BarringerH. R.BlankstenG. I.MackR. W. (eds.), Social Change in Developing Areas: A Reinterpretation of Evolutionary Theory: 19–48. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.
19.
CampbellD. T.1994“How individual and face-to-face group selection undermine firm selection in organizational evolution.” In BaumJ. A. C.SinghJ. V. (eds.), Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations: 23–38. New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
CarleyK. M.1996“Artificial intelligence within sociology.”Sociological Methods and Research, 25: 3–28.
21.
CarleyK. M.LinZ.1997“A theoretical study of organizational performance under information distortion.”Management Science, 43: 976–997.
22.
CohenM. D.BacdayanP.1994“Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study.”Organization Science, 5: 554–568.
23.
CohenM. D.BurkhartR.DosiG.EgidiM.MarengoL.WarglienM.WinterS.1996“Routines and other recurring action patterns of organizations: Contemporary research issues.”Industrial and Corporate Change, 5: 653–698.
24.
CrozierM.1964The Bureaucratic Phenomenon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
CyertR. M.MarchJ. G.1963A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
26.
EdmondsonA. C.BohmerR. M.PisanoG. P.2001“Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 685–716.
27.
EmirbayersM.MischeA.1998“What is agency?”American Journal of Sociology, 103: 962–1023.
28.
FeldmanM. S.1989Order Without Design. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
29.
FeldmanM. S.2000“Organizational routines as a source of continuous change.”Organization Science, 11: 611–629.
30.
FeldmanM. S.2003“A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines.”Industrial and Corporate Change, 12: 727–752.
31.
FeldmanM. S.MarchJ.1981“Information in organizations as signal and symbol.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 26: 171–186.
32.
FeldmanM. S.RafaeliA.2002“Organizational routines as sources of connections and understandings.”Journal of Management Studies, 39: 309–332.
33.
GarfinkelH.1967Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
34.
GersickC. J.1991“ Revolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm.”Academy of Management Review, 16: 10–36.
35.
GersickC. J.HackmanJ. R.1990“Habitual routines in task-performing groups.”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47: 65–97.
36.
GiddensA.1984The Constitution of Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
37.
GioiaD. A.PooleP. P.1984“Scripts in organizational behavior.”Academy of Management Review, 9: 449–459.
38.
GouldnerA. W.1954Patterns of Industrial Democracy. New York: Free Press.
HeritageJ.1984Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
42.
HuberG.1991“Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures.”Organization Science, 2: 88–115.
43.
HummelR.1987The Bureaucratic Experience. New York: St. Martin's Press.
44.
HutchinsE.1991“Organizing work by adaptation.”Organization Science, 2: 14–39.
45.
IlgenD. R.HollenbeckJ. R.1991“The structure of work: Job design and roles.” In DunnetteM. D.HoughL. M. (eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology: 165–207. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
46.
JamesW.1890The Principle of Psychology. New York: H. Holt and Company.
47.
KastF.RosenzweigJ. E.1972“General systems theory: Applications for organization and management.”Academy of Management Journal, 15: 447–465.
48.
KaufmanH.1977Red Tape: Its Origins, Uses and Abuses. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
49.
LatourB.1986“The powers of association.” In LawJ. (ed.), Power, Action and Belief: 264–280. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
50.
LeidnerR.1993Fast Food, Fast Talk: Service Work and the Routinization of Everyday Life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
51.
LevittB.MarchJ. G.1988“Organizational learning.”Annual Review of Sociology, 14: 314–340.
52.
LevittR. E.ThomsonJ.ChristiansenT. R.KunzJ. C.1999“Simulating project work processes and organizations: Toward a micro-contingency theory of organizational design.”Management Science, 45: 1479–1495.
MarchJ. G.1991“Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning.”Organization Science, 2: 71–87.
55.
MarchJ. G.SimonH. A.1958Organizations. New York: Wiley.
56.
MertonR. K.1940“Bureaucratic structure and personality.”Social Forces, 17: 560–568.
57.
MeyerJ. W.RowanB.1977“Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony.”American Journal of Sociology, 83: 340–363.
58.
MinerA. S.1990“Structural evolution through idiosyncratic jobs: The potential for unplanned learning.”Organization Science, 1: 195–210.
59.
MinerA. S.1991“Organizational evolution and the social ecology of jobs.”American Sociological Review, 56: 772–785.
60.
MinerA. S.1994“Seeking competitive advantage: Evolutionary theory and managerial action.” In BaumJ. A. C.SinghJ. V. (eds.), Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations: 76–89. New York: Oxford University Press.
61.
MinerA. S.EstlerS. E.1985“Accrual mobility: Job mobility in higher education through responsibility accrual.”Journal of Higher Education, 56(1): 121–143.
62.
MinerA. S.HaunschildP.1995“Population level learning.” In CummingsL. L.StawB. M. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 17: 115–166. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
63.
MoormanC.MinerA. S.1998a“The convergence of planning and execution: Improvisation in new product development.”Journal of Marketing, 61: 1–20.
64.
MoormanC.MinerA. S.1998b“Organizational improvisation and organizational memory.”Academy of Management Review, 23: 698–723.
65.
MorisonE. E.1966Men, Machines and Modern Times. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
66.
NaduzzoA.RoccoE.WarglienM.2000“Talking about routines in the field.” In DosiG.NelsonR.WinterS. (eds.), The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities: 27–50. New York: Oxford University Press.
67.
NelsonR. R.WinterS. G.1982An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
68.
OrbuchT. L.1997“People's accounts count: The sociology of accounts.”Annual Review of Sociology, 23: 455–478.
69.
OrlikowskiW.1992“The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations.”Organization Science, 3: 398–427.
70.
OrlikowskiW.2000“Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations.”Science, 11: 404–428.
71.
OrtnerS. B.1989High Religion: A Cultural and Political History of Sherpa Buddhism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
72.
PentlandB. T.1995“Grammatical models of organizational processes.”Organization Science, 6: 541–556.
73.
PentlandB. T.2003“Sequential variety in work processes.”Organization Science, vol. 14 (5) (in press).
74.
PentlandB. T.RueterH. H.1994“Organizational routines as grammars of action.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 484–510.
75.
PerrowC.1967“A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations.”American Sociological Review, 32: 194–208.
76.
RafaeliA.2000“Projecting an organizational identity: Lessons from employment advertising.”Corporate Reputation Review, 3: 218–240.
77.
RafaeliA.OliverA.1998“Employment ads: A configurational research agenda.”Journal of Management Inquiry, 7: 342–358.
78.
ReynaudB.1998“Les propriétés des routines: outils pragmatiques de décision et modes de co-ordination collective.”Sociologie du travail, 1998(4): 465–477.
79.
RoyD.1959“Banana time: Job satisfaction and informal interaction.”Human Organization, 18: 158–168.
80.
RyleG.1949The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson House.
81.
SchutzA.1967The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
82.
SelznickP.1949TVA and the Grassroots. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
83.
SewellW.1992“A theory of structure: Duality, agency and transformation.”American Journal of Sociology, 98: 1–29.
84.
SimonH.1945Administrative Behavior. New York: Free Press.
85.
SimonH.1981The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
86.
SteneE.1940“An approach to the science of administration.”American Political Science Review, 34: 1124–1137.
87.
StinchcombeA.1959“Bureaucratic and craft administration of production: A comparative study,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 4: 168–187.
88.
SuchmanL. A.1983“Office procedure as practical action: Models of work and system design.”ACM Transactions on Office Systems, 1: 320–328.
89.
SuttonR. I.StawB. M.1995“What theory is not”Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 371–384.
90.
TaylorC.1993“To follow a rule.” In CalhounC.LiPumaE.PostoneM. (eds.), Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives: 45–60. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
91.
TeeceD. J.PisanoG.1994“The dynamic capabilities of firms.”Industrial and Corporate Change, 3: 537–556.
92.
ThompsonJ. D.1967Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
93.
TranfieldD.SmithS.1998“The strategic regeneration of manufacturing by changing routines.”International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 18: 114–129.
94.
TushmanM.RomanelliE.1985“Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation.” In CummingsL. L.StawB. M. (eds.), Research on Organizational Behavior, 7: 171–222. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
95.
van MaanenJ.PentlandB. T.1994“Cops and auditors: The rhetoric of records.” In SitkinS.BiesR. (eds.), The Legalistic Organization: 53–90. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
96.
VictorB.BoyntonA.Stephens-JahngT.2000“The effective design of work under total quality management.”Organization Science, 11: 102–117.
97.
WeberM.1947The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Trans. HendersonA. M.ParsonsT.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
98.
WeickK. E.1995Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
99.
WeickK. E.1998“Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis.”Organization Science, 9: 543–555.
100.
WeickK. E.RobertsK.1993“Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 357–381.
101.
WeickK. E.QuinnR. E.1999“Organizational development and change.”Annual Review of Psychology, 50: 361–386.
102.
WeissH. M.IlgenD. R.1985“Routinized behavior in organizations.”Journal of Behavioral Economics, 14: 57–67.
103.
WilenskyH.1967Organizational Intelligence. New York: Basic Books.
104.
WitheyM.DaftR. L.CooperW. H.1983“ Measures of Perrow's work unit technology: An empirical assessment and a new scale.”Academy of Management Journal, 26: 45–63.
105.
WittgensteinL.1958Philosophical Investigations. New York: Macmillan.
106.
ZimmermanD.1970“The practicalities of rule use.” In DouglasJ. (ed.), Understanding Everyday Life: Toward the Reconstruction of Sociological Knowledge: 221–238. Chicago: Aldine.
