Several such hypotheses have been advanced in my Teacher Supply and Demand in California, prepared for the State Commission on Public Education, Oct. 1966, 54 pp.
2.
HurdBlair E., California's Need for Teachers, 1965–1975 (Sacramento: State Department of Education, 1965), p. 22.
3.
Ibid., pp. 5 f.
4.
Ibid., p. 4.
5.
The requirements are not written directly into the Fisher Act. Instead, they are found in the Administrative Regulations adopted by the State Board of Education under the Fisher Act.
6.
PinkertonW. S., “Absent Teachers,”Wall Street Journal, Sept. 6, 1966, p. 11.
7.
I owe this point to Mr. Wesley I. Dumm, member of the State Commission on Public Education, who brought it to my attention in our discussion of this general problem. The California Teachers Association is doing some of this work, but not at the right level.
8.
Office of Education, Digest of Educational Statistics, OE-10024-64, 1964, p. 63.
9.
KershawJoseph A.McKeanRoland N., Teacher Shortages and Salary Schedules (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1962).
10.
Public Law 85–864, Sept. 2, 1958.
11.
CarterLaunorSilbermanHarry, The Systems Approach, Technology and the School (Santa Monica: Systems Development Corporation, 1965), SP-2025, 30 pp.; and GerardRalph W., The New Shape of Education (Los Angeles: UCLA, Institute of Government and Public Affairs, 1965), MR-58, 18 pp.
12.
KristyNorton F., The Simuteach Trainer: Potential Uses For Technical and Vocational Training Programs (Los Angeles: UCLA, Institute of Government and Public Affairs, 1965), 12 pp.
