TillmanRollieJr., “Problems in Review: Committees on Trial,”Harvard Business Review, 38 (May-June 1960), 6–12; 162–172. Firms with 1,001 to 10,000 reported 93 percent use; 250 to 1,000 reported 82 percent use.
2.
HealeyJ. H., Executive Coordination and Control, Monograph No. 78 (Columbus: Bureau of Business Research, The Ohio State University, 1956), p. 185.
“The Committee System—Congress at Work,”Congressional Digest, 34 (February 1955), 47–49; 64.
8.
TavesE. H., “Two Mechanisms for the Perception of Visual Numerousness,”Archives of Psychology, 37 (1941), 265.
9.
HareA. Paul, Handbook of Small Group Research, (New York: The Free Press of Glencoe, 1962), p. 227.
10.
BassB. M.NortonF. M., “Group Size and Leaderless Discussions,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 35 (1951), 397–400.
11.
Hare, op. cit., p. 228.
12.
BalesR. F.StrodtbeckF. L.MillsT. M.RoseboroughM. E., “Channels of Communication in Small Groups,”American Sociological Review, 16, (1951), 461–468.
13.
StephenF. F.MishlerE. G., “The Distribution of Participation in Small Groups: An Exponential Approximation.”American Sociological Review, 17 (1952), 598–608.
14.
GibbJ. R., “The Effects of Group Size and of Threat Reduction Upon Creativity in a Problem-Solving Situation,”American Psychologist, 6 (1951), 324. (Abstract)
15.
SlaterP., “Contrasting Correlates of Group Size,”Sociometry, 21 (1958), 129–139.
16.
BalesR. F.BorgottaE. F., “Size of Group as a Factor in the Interaction Profile,” in Small Groups: Studies in Social Interaction, HareA. P.BorgottaE. F.BalesR. F., eds. (New York: Knopf, 1965, rev. ed.), pp. 495–512.
17.
Ibid., p. 512.
18.
Slater, op. cit., 137–138.
19.
BalesR. F., “In Conference,”Harvard Business Review, 32 (March-April 1954), 44–50; also HareA. P., “A Study of Interaction and Consensus in Different Sized Groups,”American Sociological Review, 17 (1952), 261–267.
20.
FoxD.LorgeI.WeltzP.HerroldK., “Comparison of Decisions Written by Large and Small Groups,”American Psychologist, 8 (1953), 351. (Abstract)
21.
HareA. Paul, “Interaction and Consensus in Different Sized Groups,”American Sociological Review, 17 (1952), 261–267.
22.
WatsonG. B., “Do Groups Think More Efficiently Than Individuals?”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 23, (1928), 328–336; Also TaylorD. J.FaustW. L., “Twenty Questions: Efficiency in Problem Solving as a Function of Size of Group,”Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44 (1952), 360–368.
23.
Tillman, op. cit., p. 168.
24.
UdallS. L., “Defense of the Seniority System,”New York Times Magazine (January 13, 1957), 17.
25.
SchlesingerL.JacksonJ. M.ButmanJ., “Leader-Member Interaction in Management Committees,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61, No. 3 (1960) 360–364.
26.
Ibid., p. 363.
27.
BerkowitzL., “Sharing Leadership in Small Decision-Making Groups,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48 (1953), 231–238; Also FouriezosN. T.HuttM. L.GuetzkowH., “Measurement of Self-Oriented Needs in Discussion Groups,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 45 (1950), 682–690; also ShelleyH. P., “Status Consensus, Leadership, and Satisfaction with the Group,”Journal of Social Psychology, 51 (1960), 157–164.
28.
Berkowitz, Ibid., p. 237.
29.
AndersonR. C., “Learning in Discussions: A Resume of the Authoritarian-Democratic Studies,”Harvard Education Review, 29 (1959), 201–214.
30.
BenneK. D.SheatsP., “Functional Roles of Group Members,”Journal of Social Issues, 4 (Spring 1948), 41–49.
31.
BalesR. F., Interaction Process Analysis (Cambridge: Addison-Wesley, 1951); Also StogdillR. M.CoonsA. E. (eds.), Leader Behavior: Its Description and Measurement, Monograph No. 88 (Columbus: Bureau of Business Research, The Ohio State University, 1957); Also HalpinA. W., “The Leadership Behavior and Combat Performance of Airplane Commanders,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49 (1954), 19–22.
32.
BorgottaE. G.CouchA. S.BalesR. F., “Some Findings Relevant to the Great Man Theory of Leadership,”American Sociological Review, 19 (1954), 755–759); Also FleishmanE. A.HarrisE. G., “Patterns of Leadership Behavior Related to Employee Grievances and Turnover,”Personnel Psychology, 15, No. 1 (1962), 43–56; Also StogdillCoons, Ibid.; Also OaklanderH.FleishmanE. A., “Patterns of Leadership Related to Organizational Stress in Hospital Settings,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 8 (March 1964), 520–532.
33.
Hare, Handbook of Small Group Research, op. cit., p. 254.
34.
DeutschM., “The Effects of Cooperation and Competition Upon Group Process,” in Group Dynamics, Research and Theory, CartwrightD.ZanderA., eds., (New York: Harper and Row, 1953).
35.
Hare, Handbook of Small Group Research, op. cit., p. 263.
36.
FouriezosHuttGuetzkow, op. cit.
37.
StendlerC.DamrinD.HainesA., “Studies in Cooperation and Competition: I. The Effects of Working for Group and Individual Rewards on the Social Climate of Children's Groups,”Journal of Genetic Psychology, 79 (1951), 173–197; Also MintzA., “Non-adaptive Group Behavior,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46 (1951), 150–159; Also GrossackM. M., “Some Effects of Cooperation and Competition Upon Small Group Behavior,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49 (1954), 341–348; Also GottheilE., “Changes in Social Perceptions Contingent Upon Competing or Cooperating,”Sociometry, 18 (1955), 132–137; Also ZanderA.WolfeD., “Administrative Rewards and Coordination Among Committee Members,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 9 (June 1964), 50–69.
38.
SchutzW. C., “What Makes Groups Productive?”Human Relations, 8 (1955), 429–465.
39.
SchutzW. C., FIRO: A Three-Dimensional Theory of Interpersonal Behavior, (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1958).
40.
AltmanI.McGinniesE., “Interpersonal Perception and Communication in Discussion Groups of Varied Attitudinal Composition,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60 (May 1960), 390–393; Also HaythornW. A.CouchE. H.HaefnerD.LanghamP.CarterL., “The Behavior of Authoritarian and Equalitarian Personalities in Groups,”Human Relations, 9 (1956), 57–74; Also GhiselliE. E.LodahlT. M., “Patterns of Managerial Traits and Group Effectiveness,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 57 (1958), 61–66; Also ExlineR. V., “Group Climate as a Factor in the Relevance and Accuracy of Social Perception,”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 55 (1957), 382–388; Also AdamsS., “Status Congruency as a Variable in Small Group Performance,”Social Forces, 32 (1953), 16–22.
41.
HoffmanL. R., “Homogeneity of Member Personality and Its Effect on Group Problem-Solving”, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58 (1959), 27–32.
42.
ZillerR. C., “Scales of Judgment: A Determinant of Accuracy of Group Decisions,”Human Relations, 8 (1955), 153–164.
43.
CollinsB. E.GuetzkowH., A Social Psychology of Group Process for Decision-Making, (New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1965), p. 101.